KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities

Muhammad K. AL-ALAWNEH
Sayfa
22–40
Yayın Tarihi
2014-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the results, the study suggested that institutions of higher education should set a vision and a strategic plan to encourage faculty members to offer online courses and provide them with training and professional development to follow up with technology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Employing computer's technology that includes e-learning system in the field of Engineering is a vital issue which needs to be discussed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Therefore, this study purposed to examine e-learning barriers as perceived by faculty members of engineering in three major universities in Jordan (Yarmouk University, Jordan University of Science and Technology, and Al-Balqaa Applied University) in the second semester of 2012.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the results, the study suggested that institutions of higher education should set a vision and a strategic plan to encourage faculty members to offer online courses and provide them with training and professional development to follow up with technology.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:E-learning Barriers · Higher Education · Engineering Faculty Members

Abstract

Employing computer's technology that includes e-learning system in the field of Engineering is a vital issue which needs to be discussed. Therefore, this study purposed to examine e-learning barriers as perceived by faculty members of engineering in three major universities in Jordan (Yarmouk University, Jordan University of Science and Technology, and Al-Balqaa Applied University) in the second semester of 2012. The study's instrument was distributed to collect the data from a sample of 176 faculty members who are involved in delivering online courses through web-based management tool. The finding of the study shows that, overall, the three barriers domains were high. However, the results show that online degree experience and the gender of participants' variables were no significant. Based on the results, the study suggested that institutions of higher education should set a vision and a strategic plan to encourage faculty members to offer online courses and provide them with training and professional development to follow up with technology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AL-ALAWNEH, M. K. (2014). Examining E-Learning Barriers As Perceived By Faculty Members Of Engineering Colleges In The Jordanian Universities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 22–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/140242

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Al-Alawneh, M. K.; Meqdadi, R.; Al-Refai, A.; Khdair, R.; Malkawi, A. (2011). Examining the effect of college type, study level, and gender of students on their use of teamwork skills as the perceived at Yarmouk University of Jordan. Canadian Social Science, 7(6), 48 Allen, M. Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J. Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis. International Communication Association. Online article from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/k/h/khk122/woty/F2FHybridOnline/Allen%202004.pdf
  2. Berg, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2003). Barriers to distance education: Perceptions of K-12 educators. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico. Berg, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y. & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training. Survey Results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (4), 409-418.
  3. Birnbaum, B. (2002). Foundations and Practices in the use of distance education. Lewiston. NY: Edwin Mellon Press.
  4. Cross, P. (1981). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Farmer, E., and Rojewski, J. (Eds.). (2001). Research pathways: Writing professional papers, theses, and dissertations in workforce education. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Daniel, J. S. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page Dillon, C. L., & Walsh, S. M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education,3 (6), 5-21.
  5. Dooley, K., Patil, B., & Lineberger, R.D. (2000). An evaluation of a multidisciplinary course delivered at a distance: Prescriptive principles to challenge our profession. San Diego, CA: Proceedings of the 27 th Annual Agricultural Education Research Conference (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 449 351). Exter, M., Harlin, N., and Bichelmeyer, B. (2008). Story of a conference: Distance education students' experiences in a departmental conference. Internet and Higher Education 11, (2008) 42–52.
  6. Fann, N., & Lewis, S. (2001). Is online education the solution? Business Education Forum, 55 (4), 46-48.
  7. Flowers, J. (2001). Online learning needs in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 13 (1), 17-30.
  8. Franklin, N., & Kaufman, D. (1999). Transforming faculty for distance learning. Proceeding of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, US