Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

NOTE FOR EDITOR: The Role Of Servant Leadership In Faculty Development Programs: A Review Of The Literature

Sayfa
15–19
Yayın Tarihi
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The work generates future empirical research ideas regarding building community, the use of servant leadership, and faculty development programs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The following note is that a review of existing literature pertaining to servant leadership and faculty development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Specifically, this work discussed delivering servant leadership to online faculty through the utilization of a faculty development program.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The work generates future empirical research ideas regarding building community, the use of servant leadership, and faculty development programs.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Community · Faculty Development · Isolation

Abstract

The following note is that a review of existing literature pertaining to servant leadership and faculty development. Specifically, this work discussed delivering servant leadership to online faculty through the utilization of a faculty development program. The idea for this literature review stemmed from the author asking how an online academic administrator could utilize the practice of servant leadership in order to improve the overall online academic experience. The intent of the review involved discovering, through a review of the literature, a way of opening up a dialogue that can possibly drive future research studies regarding the practice of servant leadership to improve of the overall online academic teaching experience. In this work, the author conducted a literature review that identified strengths in both faculty development as well as practicing servant leadership within the online education modality. The literature identified the issue of faculty isolation as challenge for academic administrators and offered up faculty development as a possible solution to overcoming it. The findings of the work showed a benefit to bringing servant leadership practices into faculty development programs in order to improve the overall online teaching environment. The work generates future empirical research ideas regarding building community, the use of servant leadership, and faculty development programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RUSSELL, E. J. (2012). NOTE FOR EDITOR: The Role Of Servant Leadership In Faculty Development Programs: A Review Of The Literature. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 15–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/140237

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Arenas, J., Bleau, T., Eckvahl, S., Gray, H., Hamner, P., & Powell, K. (2009). Empowering faculty to facilitate distance education. Academic Leadership, 7(1). Crippen, C. (2006). Servant-leadership: first to serve, then to lead. International Journal of Learning, 13(1), 13-18.
  2. Diamond, D. (2008). Leadership attributes bringing distance learning programs to scale. Distance Learning, 5(2), 33-38.
  3. Drexler, W., Baralt, A., & Dawson, K. (2008). The Teach Web 2.0 Consortium: a tool to promote educational social networking and Web 2.0 use among educators. Educational Media International, 45(4), 271-283.
  4. Eib, B., & Miller, P. (2006). Faculty development as community building. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2), 1-15.
  5. Greenleaf, R. (1970). The servant as a leader. Indianapolis, IN: Greenleaf Center. Havard, B., Jianxia, D., & Jianzhong, X. (2008). Online collaborative learning and communication media. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 37-50.
  6. Hays, J. (2008). Teacher as servant: Applications of Greenleaf's servant leadership in higher education. Journal of Global Business Issues, 2(1), 113-134. Keengwe J., & Kidd, T. (2010) Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2). Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Supporting faculty grassroots leadership. Research in Higher Education, 50(7), 715-740.
  7. Lao, T., & Gonzales, C. (2005). Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students’ experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 459-474.
  8. Lorenzetti, J. (2006). Leadership challenges in e-learning. Distance Education Report, (9), 5-7.
  9. Nelson, S., & Thompson, G. (2005). Barriers perceived by administrators and faculty regarding the use of distance education technologies in pre-service programs for secondary agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(4), 36-48.
  10. Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 113-119.
  11. Spears, L. (2000). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. Concepts and Connections, 8(3). Stewart, D., & Kamins, M. (1993). Secondary research: Information sources and met