KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku

THE COMPETITION LAW WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Zeynep Ayata(Koç Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Öğretim Üyesi,)
Sayfa
35–54
Yayın Tarihi
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Son bölümde ise, bu analizin Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukuku ve politikasıyla uyumu tartışılacaktır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Hukukun iktisadi analizi, hukuk kuralları ve kurumlarının değerlendirilmesinde mikro iktisat araçlarını kullanan disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu analizin temel amacı, “toplam iktisadi etkinlik” olarak tanımlanan sosyal refahın artırılmasıdır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Son bölümde ise, bu analizin Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukuku ve politikasıyla uyumu tartışılacaktır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hukukun iktisadi analizi · refah ekonomileri · iktisadi etkinlik

Özet

Hukukun iktisadi analizi, hukuk kuralları ve kurumlarının değerlendirilmesinde mikro iktisat araçlarını kullanan disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşımdır. Bu analizin temel amacı, “toplam iktisadi etkinlik” olarak tanımlanan sosyal refahın artırılmasıdır. Bu analiz, hukukun farklı alanlarında kullanılan bir yaklaşım olmakla birlikte, bilhassa Amerika Birleşik Devletleri rekabet hukukunda önemli bir etki yaratmıştır. Hukukun iktisadi analizinin, Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukukunda da uygulanmasına yönelik olarak literatürde ve politika geliştiren Komisyon’da tartışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu makalede, öncelikle, hukukun iktisadi analizinin iktisadi ve hukuki temelleri incelenecektir. Daha sonra, bu analizin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri rekabet hukukunda, özellikle refah ekonomileri ve Chicago Okulu’nun etkisiyle uygulanışı ele alınacaktır. Son bölümde ise, bu analizin Avrupa Birliği rekabet hukuku ve politikasıyla uyumu tartışılacaktır.

Abstract

The economic analysis of law is an approach which applies the methods of microeconomics to the analysis of legal rules and institutions. The main purpose of this analysis is to maximise social welfare which is defined as total economic efficiency. This analysis has been widely used in United States Antitrust Law. There are ongoing debates as whether this approach should also be applied in European Union competition law. This article examines the economic analysis of law and its impact on United States Antitrust enforcement through the influence of welfare economics and Chicago School. It then discusses whether it should also be enforced in European Union competition law.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ayata, Z. (2014). Hukukun İktisadi Analizi Çerçevesinde Rekabet Hukuku. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 35–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/1401734

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (57)

  1. AHLBORN, C. / PADILLA, J. “From Fairness to Welfare: Implications for the assessment of unilateral conduct under EC Competition Law” 12nd Annual Competition Law and Policy Workshop (pp. 1-42). Florence, European, University Institute, 2007
  2. ASLAN, Yılmaz, Rekabet Hukuku Dersleri, Ekin Kitabevi, 2010
  3. BENNETT, M. / FINGLETON, J. / FLETCHER, A. / HURLEY, L. / RUCK, D. “What does Behavioral Economics Mean for Competition Policy?” Competition Policy International, 2010, 6 (1), s. 111-137.
  4. BENTHAM, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1907, Oxford Clarendon Press
  5. BİLGİLİ, Yüksel, Mikro İktisat Ders Notları. İstanbul, İkinci Sayfa, 2013
  6. BOADWAY, R. / BRUCE, N. Welfare Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984
  7. BORK, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox, A Policy at War with Itself, New York, Basic Books Inc. Publisher, 1978
  8. BUTTIGIEG, Eugene, Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest: A Comparative
  9. Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law. The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, 2009
  10. CINI, M., / MCGOWAN, L., The Competition Policy in the European Union, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008
  11. COOTER, Robert B. Jr. / ULEN, Thomas, Law and Economics, 2011, Pearson, Edinbrugh
  12. Economic Advisory Group for Competition Policy, An Economic Approach to Article 82, Brussels, European Commission, 2005
  13. ETRO, Frederic, “Competition Policy: Toward a New Approach”, European Competition Journal, 2 (1), s. 29-55, 2006
  14. EUCKEN, W. “The Competitive Order and Its Implementation” (English Translation). Competition Policy International, 2(2), 1-99, 2006
  15. EVANS, David, “The Known Knowns and the Known Unkowns” Consumer Policy Review, 17(2), 48-51, 2007
  16. GERBER, David J., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
  17. GERBER, David J. “Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law” Fordham International Law Journal, 31, 1235-1265, 2008
  18. GERBER, David J, Global Competition, Law, Markets and Globalization, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010
  19. GÜRKAYNAK, Gönenç, Türk Rekabet Hukuku Uygulaması için “Hukuk ve İktisat” Perspektifinden
  20. “Amaç” Tartışması. Ankara, Rekabet Kurumu, 2003
  21. HARNAY, Sophie / MARCIANO, Alain, “Posner, economics and the law: From “law and economics” to an economic analysis of law”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2009, V: 31, No:2
  22. HOVENKAMP, Herbert. J. The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2005
  23. JOHANSSON, P.-O., An Introduction to Welfare Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
  24. KOVACIC, W., / SHAPIRO, C, “Antitrust Policy: A Centruy of Economic Legal and Legal Thinking” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), s. 43-60, 2000
  25. KROES, Nellie “Competition Policy: Achievements in 2006; Work Programme in 2007; Priorities for 2008 (SPEECH/07/425)”, Brussels, European Parliament Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, 2007
  26. KROES, Nellie, “The Place of Competition Law in the Future Community Legal Order” (SPEECH/07/689).
  27. A Renewed Commitment to Competition Policy in Europe (s. 2-5). Brussels: The Global Competition Law Centre, The Institut Montaigne, 2007
  28. LANDE, Robert, H. “The Rise and (Coming) Fall of Efficiency as the Ruler of Antitrust”, Antitrust Bulletin, 33, 429-465, 1988
  29. MONTI, Mario, “The Future for Competition Policy in the Europan Union” Speech at Merchant Taylor’s Hall, 2001
  30. MONTI, Mairo, “Merger Control in the European Union: A Radical Reform, Speech at the European Union Commission IBA on EU Merger Control” Brussels, 2002
  31. MONTI, Mario, “EU Competition Law from Rome to Lisbon–Social Market Economy” C. Heide-Jİrgensen, C. Bergqvist, U. Neergaard, & S. T. Poulsen, Aims and Values in Competition Law (s. 13-52). Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2013
  32. MOTTA, M. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004
  33. PEREZ, S. M., / SCHEUR, S., “The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC (Articles 101 and 102 TFEU) Ordo-liberalism and its Keynesian Challenge”. In PATEL / SCHWEITZER, The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (s. 19-53). New York, Oxford University Press, 2013
  34. POSNER, Richard A., Antitrust Law, Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2001
  35. POSNER, Richard, Economic Analysis of Law, 8. Basım, Kluwer, Law, New York, 2011
  36. PRIEST, G. L., “The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition”. I. Lianos, & D. D. Sokol, The Global Limits of Competition Law içinde (pp. 15-21). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 2012
  37. SAGERS, C. L, Antitrust: Examples and Explanations. New York, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2011
  38. SALOP, S. C. Question: What is the Real and Proper Antitrust Welfare Standard? Answer: The True Consumer Welfare Standard. Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1491302, Kasım 2005, siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  39. SHAVELL, Steven, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Harvard University Press, 2004
  40. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Economic Analysis of Law, 2011 http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/legal-econanalysis/, siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  41. VAN OVERTVELDT, Johan, The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers who Revolutionized Economics and Business, Agate, Chicago, 2007, s. 291
  42. WEITBRECHT, A., “From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond–The First 50 Years of European Competition Law”, European Competition Law Review, 2, s. 81-88. 2008 K A R A R L A R
  43. Airtours plc v. Commission, Case T-342/99 ECR II-2585 5 CMLR, 2002
  44. Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v. IMPALA, Case C-413/06P, ECR I-4951 5 CMLR 17, 2008
  45. Continental T. V. Inc v. GTE Sylvania, 433 US 36, 1977
  46. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. 220 U.S. 373, 1919
  47. GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v. Commission, Case C-501-06P, ECR I-9291 4 CMLR 2 October 6, 2009
  48. Kathleen R. Reiter v. Sonotone Corporation, 442 US 330, 1979
  49. Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, Case C-52/09, 4 CMLR 18, 2011
  50. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc v. PSKS, Inc dba Kay’s Kloset Kay’s Shoes, No. 06-480 551 US 877, 168 L. Ed.2d 623, 2007
  51. Ryanair Holdings plc v. Commission T-342/07, 4 CMLR 4, 2011
  52. Schneider Electric v Commission Case T-310/01, 2002
  53. State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 US 3, 1997
  54. Tetra Laval v Commission Case T-5/02 ECR-II-4381, 2002
  55. United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 1963
  56. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Economic Analysis of Law, 2011 http://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/legal-econanalysis/, siteye erişim tarihi 19 Mayıs 2014
  57. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc v. PSKS, Inc dba Kay’s Kloset Kay’s Shoes, No. 06-480 551 US 877, 168 L. Ed.2d 623, 2007