Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Systematic Mapping Study 2012-2017: Quality and Effectiveness Measurement in MOOC

Sayfa
223–247
Yayın Tarihi
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of this study are useful because it allows having a general view of the most frequently utilized methodologies to measure quality and effectiveness in MOOCs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) concentrate an important number of students and are set up as an alternative for acquiring knowledge and continuing education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The objective of this article is to analyze how the quality and effectiveness of the MOOCs were measured in empirical studies between 2012 and 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of this study are useful because it allows having a general view of the most frequently utilized methodologies to measure quality and effectiveness in MOOCs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Systematic Mapping Study · Massive Open Online Courses · MOOCs

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) concentrate an important number of students and are set up as an alternative for acquiring knowledge and continuing education. The objective of this article is to analyze how the quality and effectiveness of the MOOCs were measured in empirical studies between 2012 and 2017. For which a systematic mapping study of articles was performed by using databases of Scopus and Web of Science. These articles were analyzed according to the: (1) context of the publication, (2) type of developing institutions and distribution platforms of the MOOC, and (3) characteristics of the empirical studies. It was identified that 54% of the developing institutions were universities and that 31% of the platforms that distributed the MOOC are of Coursera. These articles were also analyzed by type of study, the more frequently used indicators to measure the effectiveness, and the more frequently used focus points (approaches) to measure quality. The results of this study are useful because it allows having a general view of the most frequently utilized methodologies to measure quality and effectiveness in MOOCs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

QUILIANO-TERREROS, R., RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ, D., BARNIOL, P. (2019). Systematic Mapping Study 2012-2017: Quality and Effectiveness Measurement in MOOC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 223–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/140143

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Adam, M., Young-Wolff, K. C., Konar, E., & Winkleby, M. (2015). Massive open online nutrition and cooking course for improved eating behaviors and meal composition. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 143. Alcock, S. E., Dufton, J. A., & Durusu-Tanriover, M. (2016). Archaeology and the MOOC: Massive, open, online, and opportunistic. Journal of Social Archaeology, 16(1), 3-31.
  2. Aleman De la Garza, L., Sancho-Vinuesa, T., & Gómez Zermeño, M. (2015). Indicators of pedagogical quality for the design of a massive open online course for teacher training. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 104-118.
  3. Arias Masa, J. (2008). Evaluación de la calidad de Cursos Virtuales: Indicadores de Calidad y construcción de un cuestionario a medida. Aplicación al ambito de asignaturas de Ingeniería Telematica [Evaluation of the quality of Virtual Courses: Quality Indicators and construction of a customized questionnaire. Application to the field of Telematics Engineering subjects] (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Extremadura, Spain. Bae, S.-Y., Moon, J., & Morrison, J. R. (2017). Design of engineering courses as a service: Emotions, senses and implementation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 1561-1574. Baldomero Ramírez-Fernandez, M. (2015a). MOOC appraisal: A quality perspective. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18(2), 171-195. Baldomero Ramírez-Fernandez, M. (2015b). Proposal quality certification of educational Spanish MOOC courses offer conducted by the National Institute of Educational Technologies and Teacher Training. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 3, 121-133. Baldomero Ramírez-Fernandez, M., & Salmerón Silvera, J. L. (2015). Edutool®: a tool for evaluating and accrediting the quality of Moocs [EduTool®: Un instrumento para la evaluación y acreditación de la calidad de los MOOCs]. Educación XX1, 18(2), 97-123. Baldomero Ramírez-Fernandez, M., Salmerón Silvera, J. L., & López Meneses, J. L. (2015). Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012 [Comparativa entre instrumentos de evaluación de calidad de cursos MOOC: ADECUR vs Normas UNE 66181:2012]. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 131-144.
  4. Baturay, M. H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(Supplement C), 427-433.
  5. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-ozbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends