Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The Relationships Between Cognitive Style Of Field Dependence And Learner Variables In E-Learning Instruction

Sayfa
117–144
Yayın Tarihi
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings were then assessed to see if they supported previous research or not and considered to future expectations for distance education and learner interface design (LID) procedures with field dependence learners.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examines the relationships between cognitive styles of field dependent learners with their attitudes towards e-learning (distance education) and instructional behavior in e-learning instruction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and the attitude survey (for students’ preferences) towards e-learning instruction as distance education was administered to 157 students enrolled in various distance education programs at Fatih University, in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings were then assessed to see if they supported previous research or not and considered to future expectations for distance education and learner interface design (LID) procedures with field dependence learners.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Field dependence · instructional Variables · e-Learning Attitudes

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between cognitive styles of field dependent learners with their attitudes towards e-learning (distance education) and instructional behavior in e-learning instruction. The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and the attitude survey (for students’ preferences) towards e-learning instruction as distance education was administered to 157 students enrolled in various distance education programs at Fatih University, in Turkey. The study findings indicated that students’ cognitive style of field dependence was correlated with their attitudes and preferences for students’ roles in e-learning for distance education. Other factors such as a previous background in e-learning, including gender, educational level, use of social networks, and e-learning tools, and preferences for instructional variables and assessment in distance learning processes were also used. Finally, technological, motivational, and instructional-learning variables in learner interface design (LID) for e-learning instruction were correlated with students’ learning outcomes, attitudes, perceptions and preferences in learner interface design (LID) and attitudes toward e-learning instruction. At the end of the study, research questions were tested and instructional variables for distance education were indicated in tables. The findings were then assessed to see if they supported previous research or not and considered to future expectations for distance education and learner interface design (LID) procedures with field dependence learners.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SOZCU, O. F. (2014). The Relationships Between Cognitive Style Of Field Dependence And Learner Variables In E-Learning Instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 117–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/140117

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development. (2nd Ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Allen, M. V. (2003) Michael Allen's Guide to E-Learning: Building Interactive, Fun, and Effective Learning Programs for Any Company. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Allen, M. V. (2006). Creating successful e-learning: A rapid system for getting it right, first time, every time. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Allen, M. V. (2007). Designing successful e-learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Allen, M. V. (2011). Successful e-Learning Interface: Making Learning Technology Polite, Effective and Fun. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, field dependent/independent cognitive styles and attitudes towards computers. Educational Technology and Society, 9,1, 289-297.
  2. Carmona, C., Castillo, G., & Millan, E. (2007). Discovering student preferences in e- learning. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applying Data Mining in e-Learning. Chan, L. J. (2009). Applying motivational analysis in a web-based course. Innovation in Education and Technology International Journal. 46,1, 91-103.
  3. Clanton, C.S., & Ralston, S. (1978). Learning Styles: Their Impact on teaching and administration. (AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Report No. 10) Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education. Dempsey, J. V &. Van Eck, R. N. (2012).
  4. E-learning and instructional design, In. R. A. Reiser, R. A. & J. V. Dempsey. (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology.(3rd Ed.), (p.281-289).Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Dwyer, F., & Moore, D. M. (1991). Effect of color coding on visually oriented tests with students of different cognitive styles. The Journal of Psychology, 125(6), 677-680.
  5. Dwyer, F. M., & Moore, D. M. (1992). Effect of color coding on visually and verbally oriented and tests with students of different field dependence levels. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20(4), 311-320.
  6. Dwyer, F. M., & Moore, D. M. (1994). Effect of color coding and test type (visual/verbal) on students identified as possessing different field dependence levels. Paper presented at the International Visual Literacy Association Annual Meeting, Tempe, AZ. Eislzer, C. F. (1983). Perceptual preferences as an aspect of adolescent learning styles. Education, 103(3), 231-242.
  7. Fleming, M. L. (1989). Display and communication. In R. Gagne (Ed.), Instructiona