KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

Teknoloji Kabul Modeli Bağlamında Sosyal Etkinin Metaverse Teknolojilerini Kullanma Niyetine Etkisi

The Effect of Social Influence on The Intention to Use Metaverse Technologies in The Context of Technology Acceptance Model

Serkan Soyak(YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2472-8237
E. Başak Tavman(OKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2544-9467
Sayfa
641–661
Yayın Tarihi
2024-10-08
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırma bulgularına göre algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan fayda ve metaverse’e yönelik davranışsal tutumu olumlu etkilemektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Metaverse kavramı dijital dönüşüm ile ortaya çıkmış bir kavramdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:İşletmelerin marka bilinirliğini artırmak ve müşteri tabanlarını genişletmek için metaverse’ü stratejilerine dâhil etmeleri kaçınılmazdır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırma bulgularına göre algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan fayda ve metaverse’e yönelik davranışsal tutumu olumlu etkilemektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Teknoloji Kabul Modeli · Tüketici Davranışı · Kullanma Niyeti

Özet

Metaverse kavramı dijital dönüşüm ile ortaya çıkmış bir kavramdır. Metaverse’ün dijital ortamda iş modellerini temelden değiştireceği düşünülmektedir. Teknolojik gelişmelerin ivme kazanması ile iş yapış şekillerinin değişmesi, işletmelerin yıkıcı iş modellerini benimseyerek bu değişime uyum sağlamasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Günümüzde rekabet avantajı sağlamak isteyen birçok işletme, metaverse dünyasına giriş yapmaktadır. İşletmelerin metaverse pazarını tanımaları ve meta dünyada tüketici isteklerini anlamaları rekabet avantajı sağlamaları açısından önem taşımaktadır. İşletmelerin marka bilinirliğini artırmak ve müşteri tabanlarını genişletmek için metaverse’ü stratejilerine dâhil etmeleri kaçınılmazdır. Pazarlama perspektifinden bakıldığında, tüketicilerin metaverse teknolojilerini kullanma niyetinin anlaşılması ve bu doğrultuda pazarlama stratejilerinin belirlenmesi işletmelere değerli içgörüler sağlayarak metaverse’e yönelik pazarlama stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine yardımcı olabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) boyutlarının ve sosyal etkinin Türkiye’de yaşayan tüketicilerin metaverse teknolojilerini kullanma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 201 kişi ile anket yapılmış ve veriler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi analiziyle test edilmiştir. Çalışmada, metaverse teknolojilerinin kullanımını etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek için Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TKM) kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre algılanan kullanım kolaylığı, algılanan fayda ve metaverse’e yönelik davranışsal tutumu olumlu etkilemektedir. Ek olarak algılanan fayda, metaverse’e yönelik davranışsal tutumu olumlu etkilerken, metaverse’e yönelik davranışsal tutum ve sosyal etki metaverse teknolojilerini kullanma niyetini olumlu etkilemektedir. Araştırma bulgularının, metaverse pazarlaması literatürünü genişleterek pazarlama uygulayıcılarına yol göstermesi hedeflenmektedir.

Abstract

Metaverse is a concept that emerged with digital transformation. The acceleration of technological developments and the change in the way of doing business make it necessary for businesses to adapt to this change by adopting disruptive business models. Businesses need to recognize the metaverse market and understand consumer demands in the meta world to gain a competitive advantage. From a marketing perspective, understanding consumers' intention to use metaverse technologies and determining marketing strategies accordingly can provide valuable insights to businesses and help develop marketing strategies for metaverse. This study aims to investigate the impact of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dimensions and social influence on the intention of consumers living in Turkey to use metaverse technologies. For this purpose, 201 people were surveyed and the data were tested with structural equation modeling. In the study, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used to determine the factors affecting the use of metaverse technologies. According to the research findings, perceived ease of use positively affects perceived usefulness and attitude towards metaverse. In addition, perceived usefulness positively affects attitude towards metaverse, while attitude towards metaverse and social influence positively affect intention to use metaverse technologies. It is aimed that the research findings will expand the metaverse marketing literature and guide marketing practitioners.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Soyak, S., Tavman, E. B. (2024). Teknoloji Kabul Modeli Bağlamında Sosyal Etkinin Metaverse Teknolojilerini Kullanma Niyetine Etkisi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 641–661. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1351190

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (112)

  1. Aburbeian, A. M., Owda, A. Y., ve Owda, M. (2022). A Technology acceptance model survey of the metaverse prospects. AI, 3(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai3020018.
  2. Adidas. (2022). Virtual gear for new realities: Adidas originals launches inaugural nft wearables collection. https://news.adidas.com/originals/virtual-gear-for-new-realities--adidas-originals-launches-inaugural-nft-wearables-collection/s/b9c13f73-b7b4-412f-9e19-f8a4d9781621.
  3. Ahmad, S., Bhatti, S. H., ve Hwang, Y. (2019). E-service quality and actual use of e-banking: Explanation through the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Development, 36(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919871611.
  4. Ahn, H., ve Park, E. (2022). Determinants of consumer acceptance of mobile healthcare devices: An application of the concepts of technology acceptance and coolness. Telematics and Informatics, 70, 101810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101810.
  5. Almarashdeh, I., Eldaw, kamal eldin, Alsmadi, M., Alghamdi, F., Jaradat, G., Thunibat, A., Alzaqebah, M., ve Mohammad, R. (2021). The adoption of bitcoins technology: The difference between perceived future expectation and intention to use bitcoins: Does social influence matter? International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 11, 5351. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i6.pp5351-5366.
  6. Almarzouqi, A., Aburayya, A., ve Salloum, S. A. (2022). Prediction of user’s intention to use metaverse system in medical education: A Hybrid SEM-ML learning approach. IEEE Access, 10, 43421–43434. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169285
  7. Alshurafat, H., Al-Mawali, H., ve Al Shbail, M. O. (2023). The influence of technostress on the intention to use blockchain technology: the perspectives of Jordanian auditors. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 37(3), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-06-2022-0103
  8. Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., ve Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381-15413.
  9. Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., Marques, G., Namoun, A., ve Iahad, N. A. (2023). Examining the impact of psychological, social, and quality factors on the continuous ıntention to use virtual meeting platforms during and beyond Covid-19 pandemic: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2673–2685. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2084036
  10. An, S., Eck, T., ve Yim, H. (2023). Understanding consumers’ acceptance ıntention to use mobile food delivery applications through an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010832
  11. Anggraini, E. L., ve Rachmawati, I. (2019). Analysis factors influencing the adoption of mobile payment using the UTAUT2 model (A case study of OVO in Indonesia). International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 2(3), 168–175.
  12. Ateş, H., ve Garzón, J. (2023). An integrated model for examining teachers’ intentions to use augmented reality in science courses. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1299–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11239-6
  13. Bansal, G., Rajgopal, K., Chamola, V., Xiong, Z. and Niyato, D. (2022), “Healthcare in metaverse: a survey on current metaverse applications in healthcare”, IEEE Access, 10, 119914-119946.
  14. Bonetti, F., Warnaby, G., ve Quinn, L. (2018). Augmented reality and virtual reality in physical and online retailing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Augmented reality and virtual reality: Empowering human, place and business, 119-132.
  15. BMW. (2022). Art Directors Club awards innovative BMW streaming platform JOYTOPIA. https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T0396333EN/art-directors-club-awards-innovative-bmw-streaming-platform-joytopia?language=en
  16. Cabrera-Sánchez, J. P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., ve Shaikh, A. A. (2021). Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2020.101529
  17. Cameron, I. (2021). Nike makes first foray into Metaverse with ‘Nikeland’ on Roblox. https://www.chargedretail.co.uk/2021/11/19/nike-makes-first-foray-into-metaverse-with-nikeland-on-roblox/
  18. Campbell, D. T., ve Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 Capital. (2022). Damat Tween, metaverse mağazasını açtı- Capital Türkiye. https://www.capital.com.tr/haberler/tum-haberler/damat-tween-metaverse-magazasini-acti
  19. Chawla, D., ve Joshi, H. (2019). Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(7), 1590–1618. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2018-0256
  20. Chen, C., ve Yao, M.Z. (2022). Strategic use of immersive media and narrative message in virtual marketing: Understanding the roles of telepresence and transportation. Psychology and Marketing. 39(3), 524–542.
  21. Chen, J., Xi, N., Pohjonen, V.,ve Hamari, J. (2023). Paying attention in metaverse: an experiment on spatial attention allocation in extended reality shopping. Information Technology & People, 36(8), 255-283.
  22. Chevalier, S. (2022). Retail e-commerce sales worldwide from 2014 to 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales
  23. Cho, H., Chi, C., ve Chiu, W. (2020). Understanding sustained usage of health and fitness apps: Incorporating the technology acceptance model with the investment model. Technology in Society, 63, 101429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101429
  24. Cook, A.V.; Bechtel, M.; Anderson, S.; Novak, D.R.; Nodi, M.; Parekh, J. The spatial web and Web 3.0: What business leaders should know about the next era of computing. Deloitte Insights. 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/
  25. Cross, T. (2021). Who is trying to build the Metaverse? https://videoweek.com/2021/10/28/who-is-trying-to-build-the-metaverse/
  26. Curtale, R., Liao, F., ve Rebalski, E. (2022). Transitional behavioral intention to use autonomous electric car-sharing services: Evidence from four European countries. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 135, 103516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103516
  27. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doktora tezi). Erişim adresi: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192
  28. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  29. Decentraland. (2023). Decentraland whitepaper. https://decentraland.org/whitepaper.pdf
  30. Deloitte. (2022). Retail in the metaverse: Understanding opportunities. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consulting/articles/metaverse-for-the-future-of-retail.html
  31. Denton, J. (2022). Metaverse may be worth $13 trillion, citi says. What’s behind the bullish take on Web3. https://www.barrons.com/articles/metaverse-web3-internet-virtual-reality-gaming-nvidia-51648744930
  32. Di Natale, A. F., Repetto, C., Costantini, G., Riva, G., Bricolo, E., ve Villani, D. (2024). Learning in the Metaverse: Are university students willing to learn in immersive virtual reality? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0395
  33. Dinh, C.-M.,ve Park, S. (Steven). (2023). How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09662-5
  34. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., ve Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction ınstrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524 Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro‐Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al‐Debei, M. M., ve Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542
  35. Efendioğlu, İ. H. (2022). Can i invest in metaverse? The effect of obtained information and perceived risk on purchase intention by the perspective of the information adoption model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15398.
  36. Elmasry, T., Hazan, E., Hamza, K., Kelly, G., Srivastava, S., Yee, L. ve Zemmel, R.W. (2022). Value creation in the metaverse: The real business of the virtual world. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/value-creation-in-the-metaverse
  37. Enache, M. C. (2022). Metaverse opportunities for businesses. annals of the university dunarea de jos of galati: fascicle: I, Economics & Applied Informatics, 28(1).
  38. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., ve Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  39. Fishbein, M., ve Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  40. Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., ve Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. (2023). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495
  41. Ganjipour, H., ve Edrisi, A. (2023). Consumers’ intention to use delivery robots in Iran: An integration of NAM, DOI, and TAM. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 13, 101024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101024
  42. Gartner (2022). What is a Metaverse? And should you be buying in? https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/what-is-a-metaverse
  43. Gauttier, S., Simouri, W., ve Milliat, A. (2022). When to enter the metaverse: business leaders offer perspectives. Journal of Business Strategy.
  44. Ge, J. (2022). Multiple influences of intelligent technology on network behavior of college students in the metaverse age. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022, 1–7.
  45. Gürsoy, D., Malodia, S., ve Dhir, A. (2022). The metaverse in the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(5), 527-534.
  46. Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., ve Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8. Baskı). Cengage Learning EMEA.
  47. Hammouri, Q., Altaher, A., Al-Gasawneh, J., Rabaai, A., Aloqool, A., ve Khataybeh, H. (2022). Understanding the determinants of digital shopping features: The role of promo code on customer behavioral intention. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 641–650.
  48. Hassouneh, D., ve Brengman, M. (2015, July). Metaverse retailing: Are SVW users ready to buy real products from virtual world stores?. In 12th International IADIS Conference on e-Commerce and Digital Marketing (EC 2015) (pp. 104-110).
  49. Hennig-Thurau, T., ve Ognibeni, B. (2022). Metaverse marketing. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 14(2), 43-47.
  50. Hendijani Fard, M., ve Marvi, R. (2020). Viral marketing and purchase intentions of mobile applications users. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2018-0291
  51. Henz, P. (2022). The psychological impact of the Metaverse. Discover Psychology, 2(1), 47.
  52. Hollensen, S., Kotler, P., ve Opresnik, M. O. (2022). Metaverse–the new marketing universe. Journal of Business Strategy, (ahead-of-print).
  53. Holmes, F. (2021). The Metaverse is a $1 trillion revenue opportunity. Here’s how to invest. https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2021/12/20/the-metaverse-is-a-1-trillion-revenue-opportunity-heres-how-to-invest/?sh=7b3b67784df9
  54. Huang, Y.-C., Li, L.-N., Lee, H.-Y., Browning, M. H. E. M., ve Yu, C.-P. (2023). Surfing in virtual reality: An application of extended technology acceptance model with flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100252
  55. Hwang, R., ve Lee, M. (2022). The influence of music content marketing on user satisfaction and intention to use in the Metaverse: A focus on the SPICE model. Businesses, 2(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses2020010
  56. Hürriyet. (2022). Vodafone: Türkiye’de Metaverse mağazası açan ilk Telekom markası. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/advertorial/vodafone-turkiyede-metaverse-magazasi-acan-ilk-telekom-markasi-42079668
  57. Iamiaa, M. (2022). Measuring Technology Acceptance Model to use Metaverse technology in Egypt. Egyptian Journals, 23(3), 118–142. Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., ve Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01315.x
  58. Jackson, D., Gillaspy, A., ve Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
  59. Karim, M., Haque, A., Ulfy, M. A., Hossain, A., ve Anis, Z. (2020). Factors ınfluencing the use of e-wallet as a payment method among Malaysian young adults. International Journal of Business and Management, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2020-2-21
  60. Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, 101280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  61. Kemp, S. (2024). Digital 2024: Global Overview Report - DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-global-overview-report
  62. Kim, J. (2021). Advertising in the metaverse: Research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 21(3), 141-144.
  63. Kim, E. Y., and Kim, Y-K. (2004). Predicting online purchase intentions for clothing products. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 883 – 897.
  64. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4. baskı). Guilford Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/11096679
  65. Koo, C., Kwon, J., Chung, N., ve Kim, J. (2023). Metaverse tourism: conceptual framework and research propositions. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(20), 3268-3274.
  66. Lew, S., Tan, G. W.-H., Loh, X.-M., Hew, J.-J., ve Ooi, K.-B. (2020). The disruptive mobile wallet in the hospitality industry: An extended mobile technology acceptance model. Technology in Society, 63, 101430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101430
  67. Lippert, K., Khan, M. N. R., Rabbi, M. M., Dutta, A., ve Cloutier, R. (2021, Aralık). A framework of metaverse for systems engineering. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Information, Communication & Systems (SPICSCON) (pp. 50-54). IEEE.
  68. Ly, B., ve Ly, R. (2022). Internet banking adoption under Technology Acceptance Model—Evidence from Cambodian users. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100224
  69. Mandolfo, M., Baisi, F., ve Lamberti, L. (2022). How did you feel during the navigation? Influence of emotions on browsing time and interaction frequency in immersive virtual environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–14.
  70. Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., ve Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
  71. Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., ve Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of YouTube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138.
  72. McKechnie, D. S., Grant, J., ve Shabbir Golawala, F. (2011). Partitioning service encounters into touchpoints to enhance quality. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(2), 146–165.
  73. McKinsey (2023). Unlocking commerce in the metaverse. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/unlocking-commerce-in-the-metaverse
  74. Meisenzahl, M. (2022). See inside the virtual worlds created by Wendy’s, Chipotle, and McDonald’s as the metaverse becomes the latest battleground for fast food. https://www.businessinsider.com/chipotle-mcdonalds-wendys-metaverse-virtual-worlds-photos-2022-4
  75. Mitra, S. (2023). Metaverse: A Potential virtual-physical ecosystem for innovative blended education and training. Journal of Metaverse, 3(1), 66-72. Morino, N. (2022). Metaverse: 5 questions shaping the next frontier of human experience. https://www.ey.com/en_tw/digital/metaverse-5-questions-shaping-the-next-frontier-of-human-experience
  76. Nagy, S., ve Hajdú, N. (2021). Consumer acceptance of the use of artificial intelligence in online shopping: Evidence from Hungary. Amfiteatru Economic, 23, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/56/155
  77. Nguyen, O. T. (2020). Factors affecting the ıntention to use digital banking in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 303–310.
  78. Nguyen, V. T., ve Nguyen, C. T. (2022). The effect of structural equation modeling on Chatbot usage: An investigation of Dialogflow. International Journal of Applied Information Technology, 6(1), 39–49.
  79. Oh, J.-H. (2021). A study on factors affecting the intention to use the metaverse by applying the extended technology acceptance Model (ETAM): Focused on the Virtual World Metaverse. The Korea Contents Association, 21(10), 204–216.
  80. Olson, E. D., Arendt, S. W., FitzPatrick, E., Hauser, S., Rainville, A. J., Rice, B., ve Lewis, K. L. (2019). Marketing mechanisms used for summer food service programs. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(5) 465–485.
  81. Ong, M. H. A., Yusri, M. Y., ve Ibrahim, N. S. (2023). Use and behavioural intention using digital payment systems among rural residents: Extending the UTAUT-2 model. Technology in Society, 102305.
  82. Ooi, K. B., Tan, G. W. H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Arpaci, I., Zaidan, A. A.,& Iranmanesh, M. (2023). The metaverse in engineering management: overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  83. Owens, D., Mitchell, A., Khazanchi, D., ve Zigurs, I. (2011). An empirical investigation of virtual world projects and metaverse technology capabilities. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(1), 74-101.
  84. OpenSea. (2023). About | OpenSea. https://opensea.io/about
  85. Park, S. M., ve Kim, Y. G. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE access, 10, 4209-4251.
  86. Park, S., ve Kang, Y. J. (2021). A Study on the intentions of early users of metaverse platforms using the Technology Acceptance Model. The Society of Digital Policy and Management, 19(10), 275–285. Piarna, R., Fathurohman, F., ve Purnawan, N. (2020). Understanding online shopping adoption: The unified theory of acceptance and the use of technology with perceived risk in millennial consumers context. JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 17, 51. https://doi.org/10.31106/jema.v17i1.5050 Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Rana, N. P., Preet, R., ve Mishra, A. (2023). Factors influencing customers’ apparel shopping intention in Metaverse. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2280842
  87. Prastiawan, D., Aisjah, S., ve Rofiaty, R. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and social ınfluence on the use of mobile banking through the mediation of attitude toward use. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 009, 243–260. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.009.03.4
  88. Rahman, K. R., Shitol, S. K., Islam, M. S., Iftekhar, K. T., ve Pranto, S. A. H. A. (2023). Use of Metaverse technology in education domain. Journal of Metaverse, 3(1), 79-86.
  89. Ready Player Me. (2023). Ready player me - About Us. https://readyplayer.me/company/about-us
  90. Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., ve Valléry, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
  91. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
  92. Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, F. N., Rahim, N. F. A., Khoshkam, M., ve Mirzaei, M. (2023). Determinants of intention to use e-wallet: Personal innovativeness and propensity to trust as moderators. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(12), 2361–2373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2076309
  93. Seok, W. H. (2021). Analysis of metaverse business model and ecosystem. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 36(4), 81-91.
  94. Shah, D., ve Murthi, B. P. S. (2021). Marketing in a data-driven digital world: Implications for the role and scope of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 125, 772–779.
  95. Shen, B., Tan, W., Guo, J., Zhao, L., ve Qin, P. (2021). How to promote user purchase in metaverse? A systematic literature review on consumer behavior research and virtual commerce application design. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11087.
  96. Shuhaiber, A., ve Mashal, I. (2019). Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technology in Society, 58, 101110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.003 Stephenson, Neal (1992). Snow Crash (1993 Ciltsiz Ed.). New York: Bantam Books.
  97. Toraman, Y. (2022). User acceptance of metaverse: Insights from technology acceptance model (TAM) and planned behavior theory (PBT). EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal, 12(1), 67-75.
  98. Toraman, Y., ve Geçit, B. B. (2023). User acceptance of metaverse: an analysis for e-commerce in the framework of technology acceptance model (TAM). Sosyoekonomi, 31(55), 85-104.
  99. Tusyanah, T., Wahyudin, A., ve Khafid, M. (2021). Analyzing factors affecting the behavioral intention to use e-wallet with the UTAUT model with experience as moderating variable. Journal of Economic Education, 10(1), 113–123.
  100. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342-365.
  101. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., ve Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  102. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., ve Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  103. Vodafone Türkiye. (2023). Metaverse mağaza | Vodafone. https://www.vodafone.com.tr/metaverse-magaza
  104. Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., ve Shen, X. (2022). A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., ve Chen, S. (2021). Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07447v3
  105. Warshaw, P. R., ve Davis, F. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4
  106. Weston, R., ve Gore Jr., P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345 Wu, D., Yang, Z., Zhang, P., Wang, R., Yang, B., ve Ma, X. (2023). Virtual-reality inter-promotion technology for Metaverse: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.
  107. Yang, M., Mamun, A. A., Mohiuddin, M., Nawi, N. C., ve Zainol, N. R. (2021). Cashless transactions: A study on intention and adoption of e-Wallets. Sustainability, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020831
  108. Yoo, K., Welden, R., Hewett, K. and Haenlein, M. (2023), “The merchants of meta: a research agenda to understand the future of retailing in the metaverse”, Journal of Retailing, 99, 173-192.
  109. Yuan, Y., ve Yang, Y. (2022). Embracing the metaverse: Mechanism and logic of a new digital economy. Metaverse, 3(2), 15.
  110. Usman, A., ve Okafor, S. (2019). Exploring the relationship between social media and social influence. İçinde G. Bowen ve W. Ozuem (Ed.), Leveraging Computer-Mediated Marketing Environments (ss. 83–103). IGI Global. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7344-9.ch004
  111. Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., ve Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112, 220–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
  112. Holmes, F. (2021). The Metaverse is a $1 trillion revenue opportunity. Here’s how to invest. https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2021/12/20/the-metaverse-is-a-1-trillion-revenue-opportunity-heres-how-to-invest/?sh=7b3b67784df9