KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

E-Collaborative Tasks and the Enhancement of Writing Performance among Iranian University-Level EFL Learners

Nazli AZODI
Ahmadreza LOTFI
Sayfa
165–180
Yayın Tarihi
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also revealed that there was no significant change in the fluency of the written texts produced by the students.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The prevalence of using social software in foreign and second language settings has caused a resurgence of interest in collaborative writing.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study investigates the benefits of collaborative and e-collaborative tasks on writing performance of the students in a process-oriented approach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also revealed that there was no significant change in the fluency of the written texts produced by the students.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Collaborative writing · e-collaborative writing · process writing

Abstract

The prevalence of using social software in foreign and second language settings has caused a resurgence of interest in collaborative writing. This study investigates the benefits of collaborative and e-collaborative tasks on writing performance of the students in a process-oriented approach. It, in fact, examines the effects on the accuracy, complexity, and fluency of the written text produced by the learners. To this end, the quasi- experimental design was employed and 74 intermediate students at Islamic Azad University (Isfahan Branch) in Iran participated in the study. They were divided into three groups by random assignment in which two experimental groups were required to perform their tasks in collaboration while only one of them had access to Telegram Application outside the classroom. The control group followed the conventional method of learning how to write. The Measures of One-way ANCOVA, having compared the pretests and posttests results, showed a significant change in the accuracy and complexity of the written texts produced by the students in the experimental group applying e-collaboration. It also revealed that there was no significant change in the fluency of the written texts produced by the students.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AZODI, N., LOTFI, A. (2020). E-Collaborative Tasks and the Enhancement of Writing Performance among Iranian University-Level EFL Learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 165–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/140012

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Abdulmajid, A. (2014). Scaffolding writing using Facebook in a blended learning ESL classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The National University of Malaysia. Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254-266.
  2. Al-Ahmad, S. (2003). The Impact of Collaborative Lerning on l1 and l2 College Students’ Apprehension About and Attitudes Toward Writing. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University of Penneyivania. Allen, N., Atkinson, D., Morgan, M., Moore, T. and Snow, C. (1987) ‘What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing’. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 1(2): 70-90.
  3. Arslan, R. S. (2014). Integrating feedback into prospective English language teachers’ writing process via blogs and portfolios. TOJET, 13(1), 131-150.
  4. Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22 (2), 185-200.
  5. Bronckart, J. P. (1995). Theories of action, speech, natural language, and discourse. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp. 75- 91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cahyono, B. Y., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2016). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Familiarity with and Opinion on the Internet-Based Teaching of Writing. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 199-208. http://dx.doi. org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p199 Dalir, M., Jafarigohar, M., & Soleimani, H. (2013) ‘The Effect of Using Weblogs on Iranian EFL Learners Writing Skill’. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW) Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.
  7. Ferris, D. (2006). ‘Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction’. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81–104).
  8. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). ‘A cognitive process theory of writing’. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
  10. Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., & Nejad Ansari, D. (2010). ‘The Impact of Portfolio Assessment on Iranian EFL Students’ Essay Writing: A Process-oriented Approach’. GEMA online Journ