KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Geosound / 2021 / Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1

Davis Tüp Testlerinde Su Akış Hızının Etkisi

The Effect of Water Flow Rate on Davis Tube Tests

Mahmut Emre Taçoğlu(Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü)
Mustafa Şen(1General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration)
Emre Toprak(General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration)
Saruhan Saklar(General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration)
Sayfa
44–53
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Davis tube · wet magnetic separation · water flow rate

Özet

The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples. It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate. It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.

Abstract

The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples. It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate. It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Taçoğlu, M. E., Şen, M., Toprak, E., Saklar, S. (2021). Davis Tüp Testlerinde Su Akış Hızının Etkisi. Geosound, Cilt: 54 Sayı: 1, 44–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/1400050

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Ahmed M. M. 2010. Statıstıcal design application and analysis of separation effıciency in Davis tube tester, Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 1047-1058
  2. Arol A.I., Aydogan A. 2004. Recovery enhancement of magnetite fines in magnetic separation, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 232, 151–154
  3. Davis, E.W. 1955. Pioneering with Taconite: The Birth of a Minnesota Industry, 269-283, Minesota Hisstorical Society Press, 2004.
  4. Haffez G.S.A. 2012. Optimization of the operating parameters affecting Davis tube magnetic tester using 2nd factorial design, Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.1217-1231
  5. Murariu, V., Svoboda, J. 2003. The applıcabılıty of davıs tube tests to ore separatıon by drum magnetıc separators, Physical Separation in Science and Engineering, 12, 1, pp. 1–11.
  6. Safarik, I., Mucha, P., Pechoc, J., Stoklasa, J., Safarikova, M., 2001. Separation of magnetic affinity biopolymer adsorbents in a Davis tube magnetic separator, Biotechnology Letters 23: 851–855, 2001.
  7. Sivrikaya, O., Arol, A. I. 2012. Evaluation of low grade iron ore deposit in Erzincan-Turkey for iron ore pellet concentrate production
  8. Schulz, N.F., 1964. Determination of the magnetic separation characteristics with the Davis Magnetic Tube,Trans. SME-AIME, 229, 211–216.
  9. Svoboda, J, 2004. Magnetic Technicues for the Treatment of Materials, Kluwer Academic Publishers