Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON TRANSFERRING THE EXPERIENCE OF USING TECHNOLOGY FROM FORMAL EDUCATION TO DISTANCE EDUCATION

Sayfa
125–134
Yayın Tarihi
2015-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, this study suggests that teachers' beliefs about educational methods are the main reason that prevented the use of different teaching materials in distance education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With improvements in information technologies, distance education programs have become widespread.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Institutions that offer distance education programs are increasing in number.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, this study suggests that teachers' beliefs about educational methods are the main reason that prevented the use of different teaching materials in distance education.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Distance education · formal education · use of technology

Abstract

With improvements in information technologies, distance education programs have become widespread. Institutions that offer distance education programs are increasing in number. Scholars who were used to face-to-face teaching began to give courses in distance education programs which entail technological teaching methods, a new teaching experience for the teachers. Formal education or face-to-face education and distance education have different dynamics. The transition to distance teaching from the first to the later involves the transmission of experiences of teaching with technology. For effective distance education, it is important to analyze the transmission of these teaching experiences. This study evaluates how faculty members' experiences with technologies in formal education are transmitted to distance education. Interviews were held with twelve scholars who have taught both formal and distance learning courses. The interviews were recorded. Content analysis method was used to obtain a deeper understanding of the data collected. It was found that the teaching materials used in the formal and distance educations were exactly the same. Some faculty members claimed that infrastructure and technical possibilities of the current system were not sufficient for the use of different teaching materials. However, this study suggests that teachers' beliefs about educational methods are the main reason that prevented the use of different teaching materials in distance education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, M., SELIM, Y. (2015). A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON TRANSFERRING THE EXPERIENCE OF USING TECHNOLOGY FROM FORMAL EDUCATION TO DISTANCE EDUCATION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 125–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/139991

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Gulbahar, Y. (2009). E-learning. Ankara:
  2. Pegem Academy. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27 (1), 65–90.
  3. Kaya, Z. (2002). Distance Education. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Academy. Keegan, D. (1986). The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15–31.
  5. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307–332.
  6. Simonson, M. (2001). Distance education and online instruction: Profession or Field?. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2 (4), 301-302.
  7. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences (7th edition). Ankara:
  8. Seçkin Publishing. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspec- tive. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 5–30.