KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Engagement in Distance Education Settings: A Trend Analysis

Ayse BAGRIACIK YILMAZ
Phil BANYARD
Sayfa
101–120
Yayın Tarihi
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, six new components were added to these principles: media properties, student characteristics, teaching method, course/content design, innovative techniques, and instructor competencies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examined studies focusing on student engagement in distance education using a trend analysis technique. 154 studies published in web of science database were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Analysis showed that there is an increasing effort to understand student engagement.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, six new components were added to these principles: media properties, student characteristics, teaching method, course/content design, innovative techniques, and instructor competencies.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:online education · student engagement · distance education

Abstract

This study examined studies focusing on student engagement in distance education using a trend analysis technique. 154 studies published in web of science database were included in the study. Analysis showed that there is an increasing effort to understand student engagement. Researchers are mostly focusing on instructional design and educational technology. More effort is needed in the area of distance education systems and theories. The findings offer support for Chickering and Gamson’s Seven Principles of Good Practice as important in promoting student engagement in distance education. However, six new components were added to these principles: media properties, student characteristics, teaching method, course/content design, innovative techniques, and instructor competencies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, A. B., BANYARD, P. (2020). Engagement in Distance Education Settings: A Trend Analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 101–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/139989

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Adwan, J. (2016). Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment. Nurse Education Today, 41, 67-72. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.028 Anadolu University (2017). Retrieved June 04, 2017 from https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/universitemiz/ sayilarla-universitemiz/ogrenci-sayilari/2016-2017-ogrenci-sayilari/haziran-2017
  2. Andrew, L., Ewens, B., Maslin-Prothero, S. (2015). Enhancing the online learning experience using virtual interactive classrooms. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 22. Retrieved June 05, 2017 from http://www.ajan.com.au/Vol32/Issue4/3Andrew.pdf
  3. Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e‐tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922-935. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01013.x Bernat, F., & Frailing, K. (2015). Perfecting lessons learned for criminal justice online graduate education: Reflection, integration, and application. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(3), 330-353. do i:10.1080/10511253.2015.1036090 Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 1-18, 299-316. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845 Boston, W. E., Ice, P., & Gibson, A. M. (2011). Comprehensive assessment of student retention in online learning environments. School of Arts and Humanities. Retrieved June 07, 2017 from https:// digitalcommons.apus.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=facultySAH Boyle, F., Kwon, J., Ross, C., & Simpson, O. (2010). Student–student mentoring for retention and engagement in distance education. Open Learning, 25(2), 115-130. doi:10.1080/02680511003787370 Bozkurt, A., Kumtepe, E. G., Kumtepe, A. T., Aydin, I. E., Bozkaya, M., & Aydin, C. H. (2015). Research trends in Turkish distance education: A content analysis of dissertations, 1986-2014.
  4. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(2), 1-21. doi:10.1515/eurodl-2015-0010
  5. Brinton, C. G., Rill, R., Ha, S., Chiang, M., Smith, R., & Ju, W. (2015). Individualization for education at scale: MIIC design and preliminary evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 136-148. doi:10.1109/TLT.2014.2370635 Carpenter, S., Reddix, R., & Martin, D. (2016). Pills, thrills, and pharmacology drills! Strategies to increase student retention in an entry-level nursing pharmacology course. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 11(4), 179-183. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.04.002 117 Chae, S. E., & Sh