KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

FACTORS MOTIVATING PRESERVICE TEACHERS FOR ONLINE LEARNING WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ARCS MOTIVATION MODEL

Serkan IZMIRLI
Ozden Sahin IZMIRLI
Sayfa
56–68
Yayın Tarihi
2015-04-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As for the least frequent motivating one, it was “flexibility” found under thetheme of “relevance”.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to determine the factors motivating pre-service teachersfor online learning within the context of ARCS motivation model.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study, in which thephenomenology model was used, was carried out with 52 pre-service teachers attendingthe department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies at the EducationFaculty of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University in Turkey.The participants were experienced in online learning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As for the least frequent motivating one, it was “flexibility” found under thetheme of “relevance”.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online learning · motivation in online learning · ARCS model

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors motivating pre-service teachersfor online learning within the context of ARCS motivation model. The study, in which thephenomenology model was used, was carried out with 52 pre-service teachers attendingthe department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies at the EducationFaculty of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University in Turkey.The participants were experienced in online learning. In the study, the data werecollected with an open-ended questionnaire within the framework of the ARCS motivationmodel. The research data were analyzed with descriptive analysis and examined fewerthan four themes (attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction).Also, for each theme, sub-themes were obtained. The most frequent factor motivating foronline learning was “relevance to individual differences” found under the theme of“confidence”. As for the least frequent motivating one, it was “flexibility” found under thetheme of “relevance”.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IZMIRLI, S., IZMIRLI, O. S. (2015). FACTORS MOTIVATING PRESERVICE TEACHERS FOR ONLINE LEARNING WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ARCS MOTIVATION MODEL. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 56–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/139966

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Bonk, C. J. (2002). Online training in an online world. CourseShare.com. Retrieved on March 24, 2013 from http://publicationshare.com/docs/corp_survey.pdf
  2. Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd edition). New York, NY: Routledge. Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self- determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741-752.
  3. Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 36-49.
  4. Clark, R. E. (2001). Mediaare “merevehicles”: Theopeningargument. In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (2nd edition) (pp. 1-12).
  5. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Gabrielle, D. M. (2003). The effects of technology-mediated instructional strategies on motivation, performance, and self-directed learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Florida State University, Florida. Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in e- learning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1-7.
  6. Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 2-10.
  7. Keller, J. M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
  8. Keller, J. M. (1997). Motivational design and multimedia: Beyond the novelty effect. Strategic Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 188–203.
  9. Keller, J. M. (1999). Motivation in cyber learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 7–30.
  10. Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learning motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
  11. Law, K. M., Lee, V., & Yu, Y.T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218-228.
  12. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48, 185–204.
  13. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd Eds). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Mcgreal, R., & Elliott, M. (2008). Technologies of Online Learning (E-learning) In Terry Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 143-165). Edmonton: AU Press,
  15. Athabasca University. Mclaren, A. C. (2010). The Effects of Instructor-Learner Interactions on Learner Satisfact