Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

EXPLORING THE DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ CYBERBULLYING, CYBERVICTIMIZATION AND CYBERBULLYING SENSIBILITY LEVELS

Sayfa
3–17
Yayın Tarihi
2015-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore it has been revealed that compared to female students male students are engaged in higher levels of cyberbullying and they become cybervictimized more frequently.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of present research is to detect cyberbullying, cybervictimization and cyberbullying sensibility levels of distance education students and analyze these levels with respect to several variables.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Study group consisted of 297 distance education students studying at university in Marmara region during fall term of 2012-2013 academic year.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore it has been revealed that compared to female students male students are engaged in higher levels of cyberbullying and they become cybervictimized more frequently.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2012-2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Cyberbullying · Cybervictimization · Cyberbullying Sensibility

Abstract

The purpose of present research is to detect cyberbullying, cybervictimization and cyberbullying sensibility levels of distance education students and analyze these levels with respect to several variables. The research has been patterned on relational screening model. Study group consisted of 297 distance education students studying at university in Marmara region during fall term of 2012-2013 academic year. Data have been obtained via cyberbullying scale, cybervictimization scale and cyberbullying sensibility scale. In the analysis of obtained data descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis H and correlation tests have been utilized. Obtained findings manifested that distance education students received low scores on cyberbullying and mid level scores from cybervictimization; that they possess high sensibility towards cyberbullying and there is statistically meaningful differentiation between cyberbullying and cybervictimization. It has also been detected that the increase in Internet usage has accelerating effect on cyberbullying and cybervictimization and that there is correlation between cyberbullying and cybervictimization. Furthermore it has been revealed that compared to female students male students are engaged in higher levels of cyberbullying and they become cybervictimized more frequently.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZGUR, H. (2015). EXPLORING THE DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ CYBERBULLYING, CYBERVICTIMIZATION AND CYBERBULLYING SENSIBILITY LEVELS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 3–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/139963

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Agatston, P. W., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Student’s perspective on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 59–60.
  2. Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Development of a scale to investigate cybervictimization among online social utility members. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 46-59.
  3. Akbulut, Y., & Eristi, B. (2011). Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1155-1170.
  4. Aricak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167–184.
  5. Aricak, O. T., Kinay, H., & Tanrikulu, T. (2012). Initial psychometric findings of cyberbullying scale.Journal of the Hasan Ali Yucel Faculty of Education, 17, 340–341.
  6. Aricak, O. T., Tanrikulu, T., & Kınay, H. (2012). Initial psychometric findings of cybervictimization scale. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 1-6.
  7. Aricak, O. T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new danger waiting for adolescents. Career Window [Kariyer Penceresi], November-December (6), 10-11.
  8. Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253-261.
  9. Ayas, T., & Horzum, M. B. (2011). Exploring the teachers’ cyber bullying perception in terms of various variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences,3(2), 619-6
  10. Ayas, T., & Horzum, M. B. (2012). On being cyber bully and victim among primary school students. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 369-380.
  11. Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 803-833.
  12. Bauman, S., & Pero, H. (2010). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: An exploratory study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 236-2
  13. Belsey, B. (2007). Cyberbullying: A real and growing threat. ATA Magazine, 88(1), 14–21.
  14. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber harassment: A study of new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277.
  15. Burnukara, P. (2009). İlk ve orta ergenlikte geleneksel ve sanal akran zorbalığına ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme [A descriptive study on traditional and cyber bullying in early and middle adolescence]. (Master's dissertation). Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara