KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Modelling the Determinants of Effective Online Tutoring Programs

Maximus Gorky SEMBIRING
Sayfa
128–139
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Inattentively, qualitative approach was improperly verified by quantitative, since effective tutoring and tutor strategy were not influenced by media perception.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Determinants of effective online tutoring program were modelled and elucidated in this report.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:They were operationally instigated as: perception of technology, rational for using Internet, perception of media support; tutor learning strategy; effective online tutoring support.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Inattentively, qualitative approach was improperly verified by quantitative, since effective tutoring and tutor strategy were not influenced by media perception.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Exploratory-design · online tutorial · tutor learning strategy

Abstract

Determinants of effective online tutoring program were modelled and elucidated in this report. It was aimed at clarifying influential factors, how and in what behaviors they were interrelated observed by Universitas Terbuka students. Exploratory-design was adopted; it was qualitatively ascertained first that conceptually five foremost factors involved. They were operationally instigated as: perception of technology, rational for using Internet, perception of media support; tutor learning strategy; effective online tutoring support. Quantitatively, they were independent, moderating and dependent variables respectively. Instruments in the form of list of queries and questionnaires for qualitative and quantitative purposes respectively were elaborated related to those five variables involved. Respondents were proportionally selected by distributing 600 questionnaires to 5,500 students under scholarship scheme, 283 were finally completed. Seven out of nine hypotheses established were validated using structural-equation model (SEM). It was detected that effective online tutorial was influenced by tutor learning strategy followed by rational for using Internet and perception of technology. Tutor strategy was influenced by rational using Internet and perception of technology. Perceptions of technology and media support were influenced by rational using Internet. Inattentively, qualitative approach was improperly verified by quantitative, since effective tutoring and tutor strategy were not influenced by media perception.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEMBIRING, M. G. (2018). Modelling the Determinants of Effective Online Tutoring Programs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 128–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/139929

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bean, J. P. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an exploratory model of college student dropout syndrome. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 35-64.
  2. Benham, C. (2002). Training effectiveness, on-line delivery, and the influence of learning style. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Conference, 41-46.
  3. Kristiansand, Norway. Bliwise, N. (2005). Web-based tutorials for teaching introductory statistics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 309-325.
  4. Bolliger, D., & Supanakorn, S. (2011). Learning styles and student perceptions of the use of interactive online tutorials. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 470-481.
  5. Cheng, J., & Swanson, Z. (2011). An examination of the effects of web-based tutorials on accounting student learning outcomes. Review of Higher Education and SelfLearning, 4(10), 14-28.
  6. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. 3rd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-methods Research. 2nd Ed. Los Angles: Sage Publication. Devine, J., & Lokuge, W. (2012). Engaging distance students through online tutorials. Proceedings of 2012
  7. AAEE Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Dawson, S. (1998). Effective tutorial teaching. Melbourne: RMIT Publishing. Elicker, J., O’Malle, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Does an interactive Web-CT site help students learn? Teaching of Psychology, 35, 126-131.
  8. Fowler, F. J. Jr. (2014). Survey research methods. 5th Ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publication. Guy, R. S., & Lownes-Jackson, M. (2012). Assessing effectiveness of web-based tutorials using pre-test and post-test measurements. Interdisciplinary Journal E-Learning & Learning Objects, 8, 15-38.
  9. Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis with readings. 7th Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Jain, A. (2006). Students’ perceptions of workshop based introductory macro-economic tutorials: A survey. Economic Papers, 25(3), 235-251.
  10. Keefe, J. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Learner learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston: NASSP. Kobayashi, M. (2017). Students’ media pre 138 Koch, C., & Gobell, J. (1999). A hypertext based tutorial with links to the Web for teaching statistics and research methods. Behavior Research methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 7-13.
  11. Lee, J., & Martin, L. (2017). Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Moti