Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

An Examination of XMOOCs: An Embedded Single Case Study Based on Conole’s 12 Dimensions

Sayfa
52–65
Yayın Tarihi
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that MOOCs are not a new form of learning, but a new form of organizing learning similar to the open university movement, but which promises more flexibility and access than open universities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study intends to examine the xMOOCs offered by one of the mainstream MOOC platforms in Conole’s 12 dimensions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The researchers participated in three xMOOCs and took into consideration the characteristics of these MOOCs by rating them as low, medium or high in terms of Conole’s 12 dimensions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that MOOCs are not a new form of learning, but a new form of organizing learning similar to the open university movement, but which promises more flexibility and access than open universities.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:MOOCs · massive open online courses · open universities

Abstract

This study intends to examine the xMOOCs offered by one of the mainstream MOOC platforms in Conole’s 12 dimensions. For this purpose, the research employed an embedded single case study using heuristic inquiry to collect data. The researchers participated in three xMOOCs and took into consideration the characteristics of these MOOCs by rating them as low, medium or high in terms of Conole’s 12 dimensions. Inter-rater reliability was 92 percent. The study showed that the openness, massiveness, diversity, use of multimedia, communication among learners, learning pathway and amount of reflection dimensions were high. The communication with instructors, degree of collaboration and autonomy dimensions were medium, and the quality assurance, certification, and formal learning dimensions were low. After explaining characteristics of xMOOCs from the perspective of open learning, the study highlighted that xMOOCs dramatically differ with regard to the implementation of the freemium business model to education and course delivery methods. It was concluded that MOOCs are not a new form of learning, but a new form of organizing learning similar to the open university movement, but which promises more flexibility and access than open universities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOCDAR, S., OKUR, M. R., BOZKURT, A. (2017). An Examination of XMOOCs: An Embedded Single Case Study Based on Conole’s 12 Dimensions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 52–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/139913

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., & Mullen, C. S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35(2), 202-216.
  2. Aydin, C. H. (2013). MOOCs: Are they really new? MOOCs vs open universities. Paper presented at the AECT Conference, Anaheim, CA. Balfour, S. P. (2013). Assessing writing in MOOCS: Automated essay scoring and Calibrated Peer Review. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 40-48.
  3. Barrett, J. R. (2007). The researcher as instrument: Learning to conduct qualitative research through analyzing and interpreting a choral rehearsal. Music Education Research, 9(3), 417-433. 63 Bates, T. (2012). What’s right and what’s wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs? Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
  4. Bates, T. (2014). MOOCs: Getting to know you better. Distance Education, 35(2), 145-148.
  5. Bozkurt, A. & Bozkaya, M. (2015). Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 58-82.
  6. Bozkurt, A. (2013). Heuristic yaklaşım: Kesfetme, deneyim, aciklama ve oz-yansitima dayali bilimsel arastirma sureci. [Heuristic Approach: A scientific process that is based on exploration, experience, explanation, and self-reflection]. 22. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresi (s.22), 5-7 Eylul 2013,
  7. Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi, Eskisehir. Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 118-147.
  8. Bozkurt, A., Ozdamar Keskin, N., & de Waard, I. (2016). Research trends in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: Surfing the tsunami wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203-221.
  9. Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39, 1-17.
  10. Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. INNOQUAL, 2(3). Conole, G. (2015). Designing effective MOOCs. Educational Media International, 52(4), 239-252.
  11. Coughlan, S. (2013). Harvard plans to boldly go with ‘Spocs’. BBC Business News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-24166247
  12. Coursera. (2017). Courses. Retrieved from https://about.coursera.org/
  13. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings