The results also revealed a significant difference in how faculty rated their satisfaction with student engagement and active learning based on their level of experience, indicating that alternative approaches to faculty development might be necessary for those new to online teaching and learning.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To design and deliver meaningful professional development programs for faculty who teach online, the unit responsible for these activities should have a clear idea of what content participants might find most beneficial to their practice, as well as what can improve instructor and student satisfaction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using an online survey, this study explored the perceptions of 314 faculty members at a mid-southern university as they relate to the online environment and institutional factors, personal factors, and student engagement and active learning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results also revealed a significant difference in how faculty rated their satisfaction with student engagement and active learning based on their level of experience, indicating that alternative approaches to faculty development might be necessary for those new to online teaching and learning.
To design and deliver meaningful professional development programs for faculty who teach online, the unit responsible for these activities should have a clear idea of what content participants might find most beneficial to their practice, as well as what can improve instructor and student satisfaction. Using an online survey, this study explored the perceptions of 314 faculty members at a mid-southern university as they relate to the online environment and institutional factors, personal factors, and student engagement and active learning. Faculty reported high levels of satisfaction with the accessibility of their courses and the technical support they receive, but reported lower levels of satisfaction with the effectiveness of online communication tools. The results also revealed a significant difference in how faculty rated their satisfaction with student engagement and active learning based on their level of experience, indicating that alternative approaches to faculty development might be necessary for those new to online teaching and learning.
WALTERS, S., GROVER, K. S., TURNER, R. C., ALEXANDER, J. C. (2017). Faculty Perceptions Related to Teaching Online: A Starting Point for Designing Faculty Development Initiatives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 4–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/139905
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2003). Seizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2003.
Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes. Madison, WI: Atwood. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439.
Bawane, J., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency‐based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397. doi:10.1080/01587910903236536 Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational research, 79(3), 1243-1289
Betts, K. S. (1998). An institutional overview: Factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in postsecondary education in the United States: An institutional study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(3). Bolliger, D. & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education. 30(1), 103-116.
Bolliger, D. U., Inan, F. A., & Wasilik, O. (2014). Development and validation of the online instructor satisfaction measure (OISM). Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 183-195. 19 Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2007). Frameworks for design and instruction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.). Handbook of Distance Education. (2nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ. Routeledge. Conciecao, S. C. (2006). Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(3), 223-224.
Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 1-20.
Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors that i