Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

E-Coaching, E-Mentoring for Lifelong Professional Development of Teachers within the System of Post-Graduate Pedagogical Education

Sayfa
214–227
Yayın Tarihi
2017-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The educational and professional e-coaching and e-mentoring programs require further studying in postgraduate pedagogical education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The research considers the readiness of teachers and postgraduate pedagogical educational establishments to use e-coaching and e-mentoring which can provide continuous professional development of teachers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The use of theoretical methods of systematization and comparison of scientific statements, experience in implementing e-coaching, e-mentoring has identified the possibility of using e-coaching and e-mentoring in postgraduate pedagogical education in continuous professional development of teachers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The educational and professional e-coaching and e-mentoring programs require further studying in postgraduate pedagogical education.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:е-Coaching · e-mentoring · postgraduate pedagogical education

Abstract

The research considers the readiness of teachers and postgraduate pedagogical educational establishments to use e-coaching and e-mentoring which can provide continuous professional development of teachers. The use of theoretical methods of systematization and comparison of scientific statements, experience in implementing e-coaching, e-mentoring has identified the possibility of using e-coaching and e-mentoring in postgraduate pedagogical education in continuous professional development of teachers. Monitoring and questioning have proved the idea that teachers require the new content of postgraduate education for their own professional development. They are interested in mastering new technologies, delivering master-classes and demonstration lessons. The results of the discussion in focus groups including representatives of the administration of educational establishments, teachers and lecturers of postgraduate pedagogical educational establishments are shown in the SWOT-analysis. The experts confirmed the need and possibility of the e-coaching and e-mentoring implementation in postgraduate pedagogical education. The major risks of e-coaching and e-mentoring implementation in postgraduate pedagogical education are e-coaches’ and e-mentors’ training and ICT competence. The Internet services, e-coaching and e-mentoring applications and programs are able to provide continuous professional development of teachers. The educational and professional e-coaching and e-mentoring programs require further studying in postgraduate pedagogical education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOVALCHUCK, V., VOROTNYKOVA, İ. (2017). E-Coaching, E-Mentoring for Lifelong Professional Development of Teachers within the System of Post-Graduate Pedagogical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 214–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/139895

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Boyce, L. A., Jeffrey Jackson, R., & Neal, L. J. (2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationships: examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. Journal of Management Development, 29(10), 914-931.
  2. Cherepanov, VS (2006). Fundamentals of pedagogical expertise. Izhevsk: Izd IzhSTU Clutterbuck, D., & Hussain, Z. (2010). Virtual coach, virtual mentor. IAP. Cranton, P. (1996). Professional Development as Transformative Learning. New Perspectives for Teachers of Adults. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104. 225 Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice. Jossey-Bass Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104. Davies, D. (2010). What's changed? Issues of impact and evaluation in primary science professional development. Professional Development in Education, 36(3), 511- 523. E‐mentoring for social equity: review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 301-320.
  3. Ensher, EA, Grant-Vallone, E., & Marelich, W. (2002). Effects of perceived attitudinal and demographic similarity on proteges support and satisfaction gained from their mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1–26.
  4. Guo, R. X., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of educational computing research, 38(3), 235-254.
  5. Guskey, T. R., & Huberman, M. (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027 (paperback: ISBN-0-8077-3425-X; clothbound: ISBN-0-8077- 3426-8).
  6. Harland, J., & Kinder, K. (2014). Teachers’ continuing professional development: framing a model of outcomes. Professional development in education, 40(4), 669-682.
  7. Houck, C. (2011), Multigenerational and virtual: How do we build a mentoring program for today's workforce? Perf. Improv., 50: 25–30. doi: 10.1002/pfi.20197 Jones, A. (2003). ICT and future teachers: are we preparing for e-learning? In Information and Communication Technology and the Teacher of the Future (pp. 65-70).
  8. Springer US. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 21