KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3

Çocuk Sosyal Tercih Ölçeği-3 (Ebeveyn ve Öğretmen Formu): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Child Social Preference Scale-3 (Parent and Teacher Form): Validity and Reliability Study

Fatime Sabahat Işıktekiner(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SUNGURLU MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-8463-2766
Çağlayan Dinçer(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5468-9155
Sayfa
859–875
Yayın Tarihi
2025-09-23
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu analizlerin sonucunda ÇSTÖ-3 Ebeveyn Formu 15 madde ve üç faktörlü yapısı doğrulanarak, açıklanan varyans değerlerinin de uygun değerlerde (0.10 ile 0.58) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada Çocuk Sosyal Tercih Ölçeği-3/ÇSTÖ-3 (Child Social Preference Scale-3/CSPS-3) ebeveyn formu (EF) ve öğretmen formu (ÖF) Türkçeye çevrilerek geçerlik, güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılması amaçlanmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmanın örneklemini; ÇSTÖ-3 EF için 36-72 ay arası çocuğu olan 105 ebeveyn; ÇSTÖ-3 ÖF için 36-72 aylık 334 çocuğun öğretmeni (n=45) oluşturmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu analizlerin sonucunda ÇSTÖ-3 Ebeveyn Formu 15 madde ve üç faktörlü yapısı doğrulanarak, açıklanan varyans değerlerinin de uygun değerlerde (0.10 ile 0.58) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sosyal içe dönüklük · utangaçlık · asosyallik

Özet

Bu çalışmada Çocuk Sosyal Tercih Ölçeği-3/ÇSTÖ-3 (Child Social Preference Scale-3/CSPS-3) ebeveyn formu (EF) ve öğretmen formu (ÖF) Türkçeye çevrilerek geçerlik, güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini; ÇSTÖ-3 EF için 36-72 ay arası çocuğu olan 105 ebeveyn; ÇSTÖ-3 ÖF için 36-72 aylık 334 çocuğun öğretmeni (n=45) oluşturmaktadır. Ölçek utangaçlık, asosyallik ve sosyal kaçınma şeklinde üç boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Ölçekle ilgili çeviri işlemleri yapıldıktan sonra kapsam geçerliği için uzman görüşü alınmıştır. ÇSTÖ-3 EF yapı geçerliliği doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA); güvenilirliği Cronbach Alfa güvenirlik katsayısı ve test tekrar test güvenirliği çalışmaları doğrultusunda analiz edilmiştir. ÇSTÖ-3 ÖF yapı geçerliği için açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) ve DFA yapılarak, güvenirliğe iç tutarlılık katsayısıyla bakılmıştır. Bu analizlerin sonucunda ÇSTÖ-3 Ebeveyn Formu 15 madde ve üç faktörlü yapısı doğrulanarak, açıklanan varyans değerlerinin de uygun değerlerde (0.10 ile 0.58) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. ÇSTÖ-3 ÖF yapı geçerliğini belirlemek için yapılan AFA sonucunda, toplam varyansın %56.47’sini açıkladığı, .30’un altında faktör yükü olan iki maddenin çıkarılarak, ölçek tek boyut olarak belirlenmiştir. Yapılan DFA ile ÇSTÖ-3 ÖF 13 madde, tek faktör olan yapısı doğrulanmıştır. Bu sonuçlar doğrultusunda ÇSTÖ-3 ebeveyn ve öğretmen formunun Türk çocuklarına uygulanabilir, sosyal tercihlerini belirlemek ve sosyal içe dönük olan davranışları değerlendirmek üzere geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.

Abstract

This study aims to translate the parent form (PF) and teacher form (TF) of the Child Social Preference Scale-3 (CSPS-3) into Turkish and to conduct validity and reliability studies. The sample of the research consisted of 105 parents of 36-72 month old children for the CSPS-3 PF; teachers (n=45) of 334 children aged 36-72 months for the CSPS-3 TF. The scale consists of three dimensions: shyness, unsociability and social avoidance. As a consequence of the analyses, the 15-item and three-factor model of the CSPS-3 PF was validated and the variance explained values were at appropriate values (0.10 and 0.58). In line with the EFA conducted to determine the construct validity of the CSPS-3 TF, two items with factor loadings below .30 were removed from the scale, and it was found that the scale was unidimensional and explained 56.47% of the total variance. As the result of CFA, the 13-item one-factor structure of the CSPS-3 TF was verified. In line with these results, it can be said that the Turkish form of both scales is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in determining children's social preferences and evaluating their socially withdrawn behaviors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Işıktekiner, F. S., Dinçer, Ç. (2025). Çocuk Sosyal Tercih Ölçeği-3 (Ebeveyn ve Öğretmen Formu): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3, 859–875. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1549667

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (79)

  1. Achenbach, T. M. & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles (Vol. 30). Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research center for children, youth, & families.
  2. Altınoğlu-Dikmeer, D. İ. (1997). Sosyal Beceri Eğitiminin İçedönük Ergenlerin İçedönüklük Düzeylerine Etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  3. Asendorpf, J. B. (1990). Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human Development, 33(4-5), 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276522.
  4. Asendorpf, J. B. (1993). Abnormal shyness in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(7), 1069-1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01774.x
  5. Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structura lequation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
  6. Bayram Ozdemir, S., Cheah, C. S. L. & Coplan, R. J. (2015). Conceptualization and assessment of multiple forms of social withdrawal in Turkey. Social Development, 24(1), 142-165. doi:10.1111/sode.12088.
  7. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223
  8. Bishop, G., Spence, S. H. & McDonald, C. (2003). Can parents and teachers provide a reliable and valid report of behavioral inhibition?. Child Development,74(6),1899-1917.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00645.x
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 8(32), 470-483.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel F. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  12. Can, A. (2020). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  13. Cheek, J. M. & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330.
  14. Coplan, R. J., Arbeau, K. A. & Armer, M. (2008). Don’t fret, be supportive! Maternal characteristics linking child shyness to psychosocial and school adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(3), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9183-7
  15. Coplan, R. J. & Armer, M. (2007). A “multitude” of solitude: A closer look at Social withdrawal and nonsocial play in early childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 1(1), 26-32.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00006.x
  16. Coplan, R. J., Closson, L. M. & Arbeau, K. A. (2007). Gender differences in the behavioral associates of loneliness and social dissatisfaction in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(10), 988-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01804.x
  17. Coplan, R. J., DeBow, A., Schneider, B. H. & Graham, A. A. (2009). The social behaviours of inhibited children in and out of preschool. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 891-905. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X396153
  18. Coplan, R. J., Findlay, L. C. & Nelson, L. J. (2004). Characteristics of preschoolers with lower perceived competence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(4), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000030293.81429.49
  19. Coplan, R. J., Girardi, A., Findlay, L. C. & Frohlick, S. L. (2007). Understanding solitude: Young children's attitudes and responses toward hypothetical socially withdrawn peers. Social Development, 16(3), 390-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00390.x
  20. Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L. & Nocita, G. (2015). When one is company and two is a crowd: why some children prefer solitude. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 133-137. doi:10.1111/cdep.12131.
  21. Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L., Xiao, B. & Rose‐Krasnor, L. (2018). Assessment and implications of social withdrawal in early childhood: A first look at social avoidance. Social Development, 27(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12258
  22. Coplan, R. J., Prakash, K., O'Neil, K. & Armer, M. (2004). Do you want" to play? Distinguishing between conflicted shyness and social disinterest in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.244
  23. Coplan, R. J., Rose-Krasnor, L., Weeks, M., Kingsbury, A., Kingsbury, M. & Bullock, A. (2013). Alone is a crowd: Social motivations, social withdrawal, and socioemotional functioning in later childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028861
  24. Coplan, R. J. & Rubin, K. H. (1998). Exploring and assessing nonsocial play in the preschool: The development and validation of the Preschool Play Behavior Scale. Social Development, 7(1), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00052
  25. Coplan, R. J. & Rubin, K. H. (2010). Social withdrawal and shyness in childhood. The development of shyness and social withdrawal, 3-20.
  26. Coplan, R. J., Rubin, K. H., Fox, N. A., Calkins, S. D. & Stewart, S. L. (1994). Being alone, playing alone, and acting alone: Distinguishing among reticence and passive and active solitude in young children. Child Development, 65(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00739.x
  27. Coplan, R. J. & Rudasill, K. (2016). Quiet At School: An Educator’s Guide To Shy Children. Teachers Collage Press.
  28. Coplan, R. J. & Weeks, M. (2010). Unsociability in middle childhood: Conceptualization, assessment, and associations with socioemotional functioning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 56(2), 105-130. 10.1353/mpq.2010.a449934
  29. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  30. Crozier, W. R. (1995). Shyness and self‐esteem in middle childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01133.x
  31. Danzig, A. P., Bufferd, S. J., Dougherty, L. R., Carlson, G. A., Olino, T. M. & Klein, D. N. (2013). Longitudinal associations between preschool psychopathology and school-age peer functioning. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(5), 621- 632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0356-4
  32. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, H.E. & Hyun H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. San Fransisco: MC. Graw-Hill.
  33. Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Marshall, P. J., Nichols, K. E. & Ghera, M. M. (2005). Behavioral inhibition: Linking biology and behavior within a developmental framework. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141532.
  34. García, I.S. & Ochotorena, J. D. P. (2016). Spanish adaptation of social withdrawal motivation and frequency scales. Psicothema, 28(4), 487-494. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.18
  35. Gresham, F. M. & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
  36. Hart, C. H., Yang, C., Nelson, L. J., Robinson, C. C., Olsen, J. A., Nelson, D. A.,. Wu, P. (2000). Peer acceptance in early childhood and subtypes of socially withdrawn behaviour in China, Russia, and the States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383494
  37. Harrist, A. W., Zaia, A. F., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A. & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Subtypes of social withdrawal in early childhood: Sociometric status and social‐cognitive differences across four years. Child Development, 68(2), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01940.x
  38. Henricsson, L. & Rydell, A. (2004). Elementary school children with behavior problems: Teacher-child relations and self-perception. A prospective study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(2), 111–138. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 23096137. doi:10.1353/mpq.2004.0012
  39. Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  40. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific software international.
  41. Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S. & Snidman, N. (1988). Biological bases of childhood shyness. Science, 240(4849), 167-171. DOI: 10.1126/science.3353713.
  42. Karevold, E., Ystrom, E., Coplan, R. J., Sanson, A. V. & Mathiesen, K. S. (2012). A prospective longitudinal study of shyness from infancy to adolescence: Stability, agerelated changes, and prediction of socio-emotional functioning. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9635-6
  43. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principle sand practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  44. Kopala-Sibley, D. C. & Klein, D. N. (2017). Distinguishing types of social withdrawal in children: Internalizing and externalizing outcomes of conflicted shyness versus social disinterest across childhood. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.01.003
  45. Kwon, K., Kim, E. M. & Sheridan, S. M. (2012). A contextual approach to social skills assessment in the peer group: Who is the best judge? School Psychology Quarterly, 27(3), 121-133. doi: 10.1037/a0028696
  46. Lawshe C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975
  47. Li, Y., Zhu, J.-J., Coplan, R. J., Gao, Z.-Q., Xu, P., Li, L. & Zhang, H. (2016). Assessment and implications of social withdrawal subtypes in young Chinese children: The Chinese version of the Child Social Preference Scale. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 177(3), 97 101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1174100
  48. Luiselli, J. K., McCarty, J. C., Coniglio, J., Zorilla-Ramirez, C. & Putnam, R. F. (2005). Social skills assessment and intervention. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21(1), 21-38. doi: 10.1300/j370v21n01_02
  49. Masten, A. S., Morison, P. & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peerassessment. Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.523.
  50. Mian, N. D., Wainwright, L., Briggs-Gowan, M. J. & Carter, A. S. (2011). An ecological risk model for early childhood anxiety: The importance of early child symptoms and temperament. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(4), 501-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9476-0
  51. Metin Aslan, Ö. & Boz, M. (2022). Moderating effects of teacher–child relationship on the association between unsociability and play behaviors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 183(2), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2029811
  52. Molina, M.-H. G., Coplan, R. J. & Younger, A. J. (2003). A closer look at children's knowledge about social isolation. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540409595025
  53. Na, L.M. (2011). A case study of sandtray therapy on a shy and maladjusted child in the presscool. Korean Journal of Sandtray Therapy, 2, 133-159.
  54. O’Connor, E. E., Dearing, E. & Collins, B. A. (2011). Teacher–child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 120–162. doi:10.3102/0002831210365008
  55. Okada, R., Tani, I., Ohnishi, M., Nakajima, S. & Tsujii, M. (2012). Development of a Japanese version of child social preference scale. Shinrigaku kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.83.44
  56. Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. American Psychological Association.doi:10.1037/10314-000
  57. Rowe, D. C. & Plomin, R. (1977). Temperament in early childhood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4102_5
  58. Rubin, K. H. (1982). Nonsocial play in preschoolers: Necessarily evil? Child Development, 53(3), 651-657. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129376
  59. Rubin, K. H. (2001). The Play Observation Scale (POS). College Park: University of Maryland.
  60. Rubin, K. H., Chen, X., McDougall, P., Bowker, A. & McKinnon, J. (1995). The Waterloo Longitudinal Project: Predicting internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 7(4), 751-764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006829.
  61. Rubin, K. H. & Coplan, R. J. (2004). Paying attention to and not neglecting Socialwithdrawal and social isolation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50(4), 506-534. 10.1353/mpq.2004.0036.
  62. Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J. & Bowker, J. C. (2009). Social withdrawal in childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 141-171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163642
  63. Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Bowker, J. C. & Menzer, M. (2011). Social with-drawal and shyness. Smith PK, Hart C. BIaekwell's hand-book of childhood social development. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  64. Rubin, K. H., Hastings, P. D., Stewart, S. L., Henderson, H. A. & Chen, X. (1997). The consistency and concomitants of inhibition: Some of the children, all of the time. Child Development, 68(3), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01952.x
  65. Rubin, K. H., Root, A. K. & Bowker, J. (2010). Parents, peers, and social withdrawal in childhood: A relationship perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (127), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.264
  66. Rubin, K. H., Stewart, S. L. & Coplan, R. (1995). Social withdrawal in childhood: Conceptual and empirical perspectives. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 157-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9044-3-4
  67. Rubin, K. H., Wojslawowicz, J. C., Rose-Krasnor, L., Booth-LaForce, C. & Burgess, K. B. (2006). The best friendships of shy/withdrawn children: Prevalence, stability, and relationship quality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-9017-4
  68. Rupp, S., Elliott, S. N. & Gresham, F. M. (2018). Assessing elementary students’ bullying and related social behaviors: Cross-informant consistency across school and home environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 458-466. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.028
  69. Sette, S., Baumgartner, E., Laghi, F. & Coplan, R. J. (2016). The role of emotion knowledge in the links between shyness and children's socio‐emotional functioning at preschool. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12144
  70. Sette, S., Zava, F., Baumgartner, E., Baiocco, R. & Coplan, R. J. (2017). Shyness, unsociability, and socio-emotional functioning at preschool: The protective role of peer acceptance. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(4), 1196-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0638-8
  71. Sette, S., Zava, F., Baumgartner, E., Laghi, F. & Coplan, R. J. (2023). Examining links between social withdrawal subtypes and internalizing problems among Italian primary school children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2022.2086118
  72. Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armstrong, J. M. & Essex, M. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher–child relationship during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43(1), 39–60. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2004.11.003
  73. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel Ilkeler ve LISREL Uygulamalari. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  74. Tutkun, C. & Dinçer, Ç. (2020). Sosyal beceri geliştirme sistemi-derecelendirme ölçeği okul öncesi versiyonu aile formu: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 53(1), 185-208. DOI: 10.30964/auebfd.483511
  75. Üztemur, S. & Dinç, E. (2022). Sosyal medya tükenmişlik ölçeği: öğretmen adayları özelinde türk kültürüne uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 238-247.DOİ:10.38151/akef.2022.15
  76. Volbrecht, M. M. & Goldsmith, H. H. (2010). Early temperamental and family predictors of shyness and anxiety. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020616.
  77. Zhu J, Yin X, Wang G, Jiang Y, Li Y. (2022). Social avoidance and social adjustment in chinese preschool migrant children: the moderating role of household chaos and gender. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24):16769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19241676.
  78. Zhu, J., Coplan, R. J., Jiang, Y., Cheng, T., Shu, X. & Li, Y. (2023). Exploring links between social avoidance and socio-emotional functioning in early childhood: The moderating role of maternal depressive symptoms. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(7), 2164-2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02598-w.
  79. Hart, C. H., Yang, C., Nelson, L. J., Robinson, C. C., Olsen, J. A., Nelson, D. A.,. Wu, P. (2000). Peer acceptance in early childhood and subtypes of socially withdrawn behaviour in China, Russia, and the States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383494