KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Determination of the Quality Degree, Grazing Intensity and Hay Quality of Rangelands at Different Directions and Altitudes

Erdal Çaçan(DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND ANIMAL PRODUCTION)0000-0002-9469-2495
Mehmet Başbağ(DICLE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS)0000-0002-7853-7604
Sayfa
13–22
Yayın Tarihi
2019-02-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

West and South directions in terms of crude protein; South direction and 1704 m altitude in terms of phosphor; South, East and West directions in terms of calcium; West direction , 1704 m and 1876 m altitudes in terms of magnesium gave the best results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to determine the rangeland quality degree, grazing intensity and hay quality of rangelands at four different directions and three altitudes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:T he best rangeland quality degree was determined in rangelands facing the North (3.41) and at 1704 m altitude (3.84), and rangelands condition was classified as “poor”.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:West and South directions in terms of crude protein; South direction and 1704 m altitude in terms of phosphor; South, East and West directions in terms of calcium; West direction , 1704 m and 1876 m altitudes in terms of magnesium gave the best results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Altitude · Direction · Quality

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the rangeland quality degree, grazing intensity and hay quality of rangelands at four different directions and three altitudes. T he best rangeland quality degree was determined in rangelands facing the North (3.41) and at 1704 m altitude (3.84), and rangelands condition was classified as “poor”. Grazing intensity of the rangelands was determined to be 41.01 animal unit, and required rangelands area for 1 animal unit was calculated to be 24.38 decares. The dry hay content was determined to be 18.50% crude protein, 36.41% acid detergent fiber, 52.11% neutral detergent fiber, 60.54% digestible dry matter, 2.39% dry matter intake, 113.51 relative feed value, 0.30% phosphor, 2.00% potassium, 1.63% calcium, and 0.38% magnesium. West and South directions in terms of crude protein; South direction and 1704 m altitude in terms of phosphor; South, East and West directions in terms of calcium; West direction , 1704 m and 1876 m altitudes in terms of magnesium gave the best results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çaçan, E., Başbağ, M. (2019). Determination of the Quality Degree, Grazing Intensity and Hay Quality of Rangelands at Different Directions and Altitudes. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.457807

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (27)

  1. Ağın, Ö. (2012). The hay yield and botanical composition of a range at Karapolat village, Yedisu in Bingöl. [Master Thesis] Bingöl Üniversity Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Bingöl.
  2. Alan, M., Ekiz, H. (2001). A vegetation survey in forest of Küredağı-Bala. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4); 62-69.
  3. Babalık, A.A. (2008). Range vegetation characteristics and their variation in relation with some soil properties and topographic factors in Isparta region. [Ph.D. Thesis] Süleyman Demirel University Graduate School of Applied and Natural Sciences Department of Forest Engineering, Isparta.
  4. Bakır, Ö. (1970). A Rangeland Study at the Middle East Technical University. Publications of Ankara University Agriculture Faculty, No:232.
  5. Bakoğlu, A., Koç, A. (2002). Comparison of some soil and vegetation characteristics of two different part of grazing and protected rangeland. Science and Engineering Journal of Firat University, 14(1), 37-77.
  6. Balabanlı, C., Albayrak, S., Yüksel, O. (2010). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on the quality and yield of native rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(2):164-168.
  7. Budaklı Çarpıcı, E. (2011). Changes in leaf area index, light interception, quality and dry matter yield of an abandoned rangeland as affected by the different levels of nitrojen and phosphorus fertilization. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 16 (2):117-120.
  8. Çınar, S. (2001). Research on the hay yield and botanical composition of a range in Hanyeri village, Tufanbeyli Adana. [Master Thesis] Department of Field Crops Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Çukurova, Adana.
  9. Çomaklı, B., Daşçı, M., Koç, A. (2008). The effects of traditional grazing practice on upland (yayla) rangeland vegetation and forage quality. Turk J Agric For, 32: 259-265.
  10. Erkovan, H.İ., Gullap, M.K., Daşcı, M., Koç, A. (2009). Changes in leaf area index, forage quality and above-ground biomass in grazed and ungrazed rangelands of eastern anatolia region. Agriculture Faculty of Ankara University, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(3): 217-223.
  11. Erkun, V. (1971). Rangeland research in Hakkari and Van Province. Ministry of Agriculture, Publications of General Directorate of Agricultural Affairs, G.13, Ankara.
  12. Gökkuş, A., Koç, A., Çomaklı, B. (2000). Meadow-Rangeland Application Guide (improved second edition). Publications of Agriculture Faculty of Atatürk University, Publication no:142, Erzurum.
  13. Güllap, M.K. (2010). Effect of different grazing system applications on rangeland vegetation in Kargapazarı mountain (Erzurum). [Ph.D. Thesis] Atatürk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Erzurum.
  14. Karaman, M.R. (2012). Plant Nutrition. Gübretaş Guidebook Series:2, s.874.
  15. Koç, A., Gökkuş, A., Bakoğlu, A., Özaslan, A. (2000). Temporal variation in chemical properties of plant samples during grazing season from Palandoken rangeland. International Animal Nutrition Congress 2000, Isparta, 471-478.
  16. Morrison, J.A. (2003). Hay and Pasture Management, Chapter 8. Extension Educator, Crop Systems Rockford Extension Center. http://iah.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf/ Agronomy_HB /08chapter.pdf
  17. Nadir, M. (2010). Tokat province village of Yeşilyurt natural pastures botanical composition, dry matter yield and quality determination. [Master Thesis] Gaziosmanpaşa University, Instute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Tokat.
  18. Özmen, T. (1977). Researhes on vegetation of rangeland in Konya province. [Ph.D. Thesis] Ankara University, Instute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Ankara.
  19. Şahinoğlu, O. (2010). The effect of different improvement methods applied on rangeland in Koşu village of Bafra on the hay yield, hay quality and botanical composition. [Ph.D. Thesis] Ondokuz Mayıs University, Instute of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, Samsun.
  20. Şen, Ç. (2010). Research on the vegetation structures of the pastures in some villages of province Kilis. [Master Thesis] Çukurova University, Instute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Adana.
  21. Tükel, T. (1981). Researches on determination vegetation and hay yield between protected typical steppe rangeland and public property rangeland in Ulukışla. [Associate Prof. Thesis] Agriculture Faculty of Çukurova University, Adana.
  22. Tükel, T., Hatipoğlu, R. (1987). A researh in Çukurova contidions to determination of the effect of different doses of nitrogen on yield and botanical composition at the natural rangeland that H. hirta L. is dominant. Journal Agriculture Faculty of Çukurova Universtiy, Number: 1, Adana.
  23. Tükel, T., Hatipoglu, R. (1997). Meadow-Rangeland Management. Publications Agriculture Fakulty of Çukurova Univeresity, offset workshop, s.152, Adana.
  24. Tükel, T., Hatipoğlu, R., Çakmak, İ., Kutlu, H.R. (1999). Determination vegetation, yield and forage quality of meadow-rangeland and inorganic substances carried in the basin at the upper Göksu basin. Turkey 3. Congress of Field Crops, 15-18 November, s.12-17, Adana.
  25. Türker, A. (2006). Research on hay yield and botanical composition of an afforestation area protected since 1997 in Topak Ardıç locality of Oluk Koyak vilalge, Tarsus-Mersin. [Master Thesis], Department of Field Crops, Institude of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Çukurova, Adana.
  26. Uslu, Ö.S. (2005). Research on the botanical composition and effects of different fertilizer applications on the yield and botanical composition of Yeniyapan range in Araplar village, Kahramanmaraş. [PhD Thesis] Department of Field Crops, Institude of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Çukurova, Adana.
  27. Yılmaz, T. (1977). Researches on the vegetation that ocur in the problem areas in Konya. Minitstry of Agriculture, General Directorate of Soil and Water, Publications of Konya Reginal Soil and Water Research Institute, General Publication Number:46, Report Series Number:32, Konya.