Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Pollen analysis of honeys from Yığılca region (Düzce), Turkey

Elif Ayşe Yıldırım(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, FACULTY OF FOREST)0000-0003-2097-6863
Nurgül Karlıoğlu Kılıç(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, FACULTY OF FOREST, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY BOTANY)0000-0002-6255-6819
Neval Güneş Özkan(DUZCE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF FOREST, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY BOTANY)0000-0002-8718-2390
Sayfa
259–271
Yayın Tarihi
2021-09-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lamiaceae and Rosaceae were the most represented families in honey samples.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine the plant species preferred by Apis mellifera L., which is a valuable genotype in terms of vitality and high honey production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of the pollen analysis on these samples, it was determined that Yığılca local honeybee use pollen grains of 43 different taxa from 26 families.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lamiaceae and Rosaceae were the most represented families in honey samples.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:4 samples
⚙️Değişkenler:Castanea sativa · honeybee · honey

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the plant species preferred by Apis mellifera L., which is a valuable genotype in terms of vitality and high honey production. For this purpose, seven honey samples from Yığılca region in Düzce (Turkey) were examined for pollen analysis. As a result of the pollen analysis on these samples, it was determined that Yığılca local honeybee use pollen grains of 43 different taxa from 26 families. Six samples of honey were unifloral (> 45% pollen of one taxon in sample) with four being unifloral for Rhododendron ponticum and two for Castanea sativa. One sample of honey was classified as multifloral with the percentages of secondary and rare pollen groups. The honeys had contained 14 to 30 different types of pollen. The average number of pollen types per honey was 21. The dominant groups of pollen grains were determined as Rhododendron ponticum in 4 samples and Castanea sativa in 2 samples. Secondary pollen components were from 3 taxa: Fagus orientalis, Rhododendron ponticum and Quercus sp. Four pollen types occurred as ‘minor’ types and pollen grains of 37 taxa were in rare quantities. Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lamiaceae and Rosaceae were the most represented families in honey samples.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldırım, E. A., Kılıç, N. K., Özkan, N. G. (2021). Pollen analysis of honeys from Yığılca region (Düzce), Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.1001338

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Altay, V., Karahan, P., Karahan, F., Öztürk, M. (2018). Pollen analysis of honeys from Hatay/Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 11(3), 209-222.
  2. Aytuğ, B. (1967). Polen Morfolojisi ve Türkiye’nin Önemli Gymnospermleri Üzerinde Palinolojik Araştırmalar. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  3. Doğan, C., Sorkun, K. (2001). Pollen analysis of honeys from Aegean, Marmara, Mediterranean and Black Sea Regions in Turkey. Mellifera, 1(1), 34-44.
  4. Erdoğan, N., Pehlivan, S., Doğan, C. (2006). Pollen analysis of honeys from Hendek, Akyazı and Kocaali districts of Adapazarı province (Turkey). Mellifera, 6(10-12), 20-27.
  5. Erdtman, G. (1952). Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy-angiosperms. The Chronica Botanica Company, Waltham, US.
  6. Erdtman, G. (1957). Pollen and spore morphology/plant taxonomy Gymnospermae, Pteridopyhta, Bryophyta. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, SE.
  7. Faegri, K; Iversen, J. (1964). Textbook of pollen analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Munksgaard, DK.
  8. Kambur, M., Kekeçoğlu, M., Yıldız, İ. (2015). Düzce ili Yığılca ilçesinde üretilen balların kimyasal ve palinolojik analiz yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 15(2), 67-79.
  9. Kaya, Z., Binzet, R., Orcan, N. (2005). Pollen analysis of honeys from some regions in Turkey. Apiacta, 40, 10-15.
  10. Özler, H. (2015). Melissopalynological analysis of honey samples belonging to different districts of Sinop, Turkey. Mellifera, 15(1), 1–11.
  11. Özler, H. (2018). Güney Anadolu Bölgesine ait ballarda polen analizi. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 18(2), 73-86.
  12. Sawyer, R. (1981). Pollen Identification for Beekeepers. University College Cardiff Press, Cardiff, US.
  13. Silici, S., Gökçeoğlu, M. (2007). Pollen analysis of honeys from Mediterranean Region of Anatolia. Grana, 46(1), 57-64.
  14. Sorkun, K. (2008). Türkiye’nin Nektarlı Bitkileri, Polenleri ve Balları. Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara, TR.
  15. Sorkun, K., Doğan, C. (1995). Pollen analysis in honey collected from different regions of Turkey. Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Sciences and Engineering, 16, 15-24.
  16. Sorkun, K., İnceoğlu, Ö. (1984). Dominant pollens in honeys of Central Anatolia Region. Nature Science Journal, 8(3), 377-381.
  17. Şık, L., Güvensen, A., Durmuşkahya, C., Erol, O. (2017). Pollen analysis of honeys from Ardahan/Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 10(2), 12-19.
  18. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (TOB) (2020). Türk Gıda Kodeksi-Bal Tebliği. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2020/04/20200422-13.htm/ (Visited on date: 03/11/2020).
  19. Woodhouse, R. P. (1935). Pollen Grains. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, NY.
  20. Yılmaz, A., Işık, Ö., Yıldırım, S. (2017). Yığılca Balköy Bal Üretim Ormanı Uygulama Projesi. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Düzce, TR.