KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2026

Robotik Kodlama Destekli Eğitim Programı’nın Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarının 21. Yüzyıl Becerilerine Etkisi

The Impact of a Robotics Coding-Supported Education Program on Preschool Children's 21st Century Skills

Tuğba Kanmaz(KIRŞEHİR AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0810-6304
Fatma Tezel Şahin(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GAZİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2098-2411
Sayfa
1–13
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen bulgular, robotik kodlama destekli eğitim programının çocukların 21. yüzyıl becerilerini kazanmalarına katkı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çalışmanın amacı, robotik kodlama destekli eğitim programının okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının 21. yüzyıl becerilerine olan etkisini ortaya koymaktır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışma grubu, Kütahya ilinin Emet ilçesinde Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı bir ilkokulun anasınıfında öğrenim gören toplam 34 çocuktan oluşmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen bulgular, robotik kodlama destekli eğitim programının çocukların 21. yüzyıl becerilerini kazanmalarına katkı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Robotik kodlama · 21.yüzyıl becerileri · okul öncesi dönem

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, robotik kodlama destekli eğitim programının okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının 21. yüzyıl becerilerine olan etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden yarı deneysel desen kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma grubu, Kütahya ilinin Emet ilçesinde Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı bir ilkokulun anasınıfında öğrenim gören toplam 34 çocuktan oluşmaktadır. Sabah eğitimine devam eden 16 çocuk deney grubunu, öğleden sonra eğitimine devam eden 18 çocuk ise kontrol grubunu oluşturmuştur. Veriler, “Genel Bilgi Formu” ve Yalçın, Simsar ve Dinler (2020) tarafından hazırlanan “5-6 Yaş Çocuklar İçin 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri Ölçeği (DAY-2)” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın başlangıcında, deney ve kontrol grubundaki çocuklara söz konusu ölçek ön test olarak uygulanmıştır. Ön testlerin ardından, deney grubuna 12 hafta süresince haftada iki gün olmak üzere “Robotik Kodlama Destekli Eğitim Programı” uygulanmıştır. Uygulamanın tamamlanmasının ardından her iki gruba da son test uygulanarak programın etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca programın kalıcılığını belirlemek amacıyla, uygulamanın bitiminden dört hafta sonra deney grubuna aynı ölçek tekrar uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, robotik kodlama destekli eğitim programının çocukların 21. yüzyıl becerilerini kazanmalarına katkı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın, okul öncesi öğretmenlerine günlük eğitim akışlarında bu becerilere yer verme konusunda rehberlik edebileceği ve alan yazına önemli katkılar sunabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the impact of robotic coding-supported education program on the development of 21st century skills in preschool children. The research was designed using a quasi-experimental model, a type of quantitative research methodology. The study group consisted of 34 children enrolled in the kindergarten of a primary school under the authority of the Ministry of National Education in the Emet district of Kütahya province. 16 children attending the morning session constituted the experimental group, while 18 children attending the afternoon session constituted the control group. Data were collected through the “General Information Form” and the “21st Century Skills Scale for 5–6-Year-Old Children (DAY-2)” developed by Yalçın, Simsar, and Dinler (2020). At the outset of the study, the scale was administered as a pre-test to both the experimental and control groups. Subsequently, the experimental group participated in the “Robotic Coding-Supported Education Program” twice a week over a period of 12 weeks. Upon completion of the intervention, the post-test was administered to both groups in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Additionally, to assess the retention of the program’s impact, the same scale was re-administered to the experimental group four weeks after the intervention concluded. The findings indicate that the robotic coding-supported education program significantly contributed to the development of children’s 21st century skills. It is anticipated that this study will provide valuable guidance for preschool educators in integrating these skills into daily educational practices and offer a meaningful contribution to the existing body of literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kanmaz, T., Şahin, F. T. (2026). Robotik Kodlama Destekli Eğitim Programı’nın Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarının 21. Yüzyıl Becerilerine Etkisi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2026, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1734444

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (78)

  1. Afari, E., & Khine, M. (2017). Robotics as an educational tool: Impact of lego mindstorms, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(6), 437-442.
  2. Akyol, N. A. (2023). Examination on 21st-century skills of preschool teachers. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 57-70.
  3. Altun, C. A. (2018). Okul öncesi öğretim programına algoritma ve kodlama eğitimi entegrasyonunun öğrencilerin problem çözme becerisine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  4. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.105954
  5. Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Science, 9(2), 73.
  6. Atabay, E. ve Albayrak, M. (2020). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarına oyunlaştırma ile algoritma eğitimi verilmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 8(3), 856-868. https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.672232
  7. Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis S., & Nika P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support Student’s metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics? Journal of Science Education Technology, 27(1), 70-85.
  8. Aydoğdu, F., Dilek, D. ve Tatar, N. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on pre-school children's skills of scientific process. Research in STEM Education, 6(2), 75-93.
  9. Bakala, E., Gerosa, A., Hourcade, J. P., & Tejera, G. (2021). Preschool children, robots, and computational thinking: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 29, 100337.
  10. Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding and computational thinking in early childhood: The impact of Scratch Jr in Europe. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 8.
  11. Bers, M. U. (2020). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Routledge.
  12. Bers, M. U., González-González, C., & Armas Torres, M. B. (2019). Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Computers & Education, 138, 130-145.
  13. Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Mc Kinnon, C., Aradhya, D., Alyaeesh, M., Luo, W., & Shapiro, B. R. (2023). An exploration of robot programming as a foundation for spatial reasoning and computational thinking in preschooler’s guided play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 57-67.
  14. Burns, T., & Sinfield, S. (2004). Teaching, learning and study skills: A guide for tutors. Sage Publications.
  15. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
  16. Caceffo, R., Gonçalves, D. A., Bonacin, R., Dos Reis, J. C., Valente, J. A., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2022). Children's social interactions within a socioenactive scenario. Computers & Education, 176, 104324.
  17. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio books.
  18. Campos, V. M., & Muñoz, F. J. R. (2023). Design and piloting of a proposal for intervention with educational robotics for the development of lexical relationships in early childhood education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-13.
  19. Canbeldek, M., & Isikoglu, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of “productive children: coding and robotics education program” in early childhood education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3359-3379.
  20. Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st century skills: Focus on assessment. Brookings Institution.
  21. Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary student’s computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computer & Education, 109, 162-175.
  22. Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, L., Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., & Tu, Y. F. (2025). Incremental project-based robot programming: Effects on young children’s computational thinking, executive function, and learning behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 105471.
  23. Çakır, R., Korkmaz, Ö., İdil, Ö. ve Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2021). The effect of robotic coding education on preschoolers’ problem solving and creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100812.
  24. Çavuş, N. ve Helvacı, M. (2021). Examination of the relationship between teachers' qualifications to use of 21st century skills and teachers' levels of readiness for change. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i11.3996
  25. Çetingöz, D. (2023). Development of 21st century skills during preschool period: A phenomenological study in Türkiye. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 15(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijeaps2023.0755
  26. De Vries M. J. (2018). Handbook of technology education. Cham: Springer.
  27. Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills (pp. 51-76). Solution Tree Press.
  28. Druga, S. (2025). Coding isn't dead, but how it's taught needs to change. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/google-deepmind-research-scientist-coding-not-dead-ai-education-2025-5
  29. Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97.
  30. Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the “Robot hokey-pokey!” children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81-101.
  31. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). Mc Graw-Hill Education.
  32. Gaki, O., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2023). Computational thinking and problem-solving skills in preschool education: Children’s engagement and response to a sequence of programming activities with scratch Jr. In T. Bratitsis (Ed.), Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 233-252). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34291-2_13
  33. Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What are they and how do we assess them?. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
  34. Heikkilä, M. (2020). What happens when the robot gets eyelashes? Gender perspective on programming in preschool. In A. Mac Donald, L. Danaia & S. Murphy (Eds.), STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum (pp. 29-44). Singapore: Springer.
  35. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Aspen Institute.
  36. Hwang, W. Y., & Wu S. Y. (2014). A case study of collaboration with multi-robots and its effect on children’s interaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 429-443.
  37. Kabadayı Siper G. (2019). Robotik uygulamalarının okul öncesi çocukların yaratıcı düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  38. Kerdthaworn, P., & Chaichomchuen, S. (2021). A Learning model of STEM education on cloud computing technology, to promote learning and innovation skills for students practicing teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012073
  39. Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
  40. Küçükkara, M. F., & Aksüt, P. (2021). Okul Öncesi Dönemde Bilgisayarsız Kodlama Eğitimine Bir Örnek: Problem Çözme Becerileri İçin Etkinlik Temelli Algoritma. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 11(2), 81-91.
  41. Lee, C., & Xiong, J. (2024). From keyboard to chatbot: An AI-powered integration platform with large-language models for teaching computational thinking for young children. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:2405.00750.
  42. Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy STEM attitudes and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860-876.
  43. Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn C. D., & Baehr E. (2017). The role of Robotics team’s collaboration quality on team performance in a robotics tournament. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 564-584.
  44. Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (3rd ed.). Pyrczak Publishing.
  45. Metin, S. (2022). Activity-based unplugged coding during the preschool period. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 149-165.
  46. Mikropoulos T. A., & Bellou, I. (2013). ‘Educational robotics as mindtools. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 5-14.
  47. Minton, D. (2005). Teaching skills in further and adult education (3rd ed.). Thomson Learning.
  48. Misirli, A., & Komis, V. (2023). Computational thinking in early childhood education: The impact of programming a tangible robot on developing debugging knowledge. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 139-158.
  49. Mutoharoh, H., Hufad, A., Faturrohman, M., & Rusdiyani, I. (2021). Unplugged coding activities for early childhood problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 15(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.151.07
  50. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2020). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 1–20.
  51. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). The effectiveness of computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’ understanding of numbers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01061-2
  52. Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2017). Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning: A literature review. Entertainment Computing, 18, 57–78.
  53. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 framework definitions. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf
  54. Ratnasari, D., Roemintoyo, R., & Winarno, W. (2019). Implementation of education management as a medicine in the achievement of 21st century skills in primary school. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Education and Information Technologies, 6(21), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2286827
  55. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.
  56. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691.
  57. Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
  58. Sayın, Z., ve Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Yeni bir 21. yüzyıl becerisi olarak kodlama eğitimi ve kodlamanın eğitim politikalarına etkisi. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 3(5), 1-13.
  59. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Quasi-experiments: interrupted time-series designs. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, 1, 171-205.
  60. Silva, E. F., Dembogurski, B. J., & Semaan, G. S. (2021). A systematic review of computational thinking in early ages. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:2106.10275.
  61. Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2015). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 293- 319. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9287-7.
  62. Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2018). What they learn when they learn coding: Investigating cognitive domains and computer programming knowledge in young children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 541–575.
  63. Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). What they learn when they learn coding: Investigating cognitive domains and computer programming knowledge in young children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 541–575.
  64. Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019a). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing young children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-1
  65. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology ve Design Education, 26, 3-20.
  66. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Dancing robots: İntegrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 325-346.
  67. Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 12, 203.
  68. Sung, J., Lee, J. Y., & Chun, H. Y. (2023). Short-term effects of a classroom-based STEAM program using robotic kits on children in South Korea. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-18.
  69. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. Baskı). MA: Pearson.
  70. Tennant, M., Mc Mullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2009). Teaching, learning and research in higher education: A critical approach. Routledge Publications.
  71. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
  72. Turanlı, M., & Güriş, S. (2015). Temel istatistik. İstanbul: Der.
  73. Voogt, J. & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.
  74. Wang, L., Shi, D., Geng, F., Hao, X., Chanjuan, F., & Li, Y. (2022). Effects of cognitive control strategies on coding learning outcomes in early childhood. The Journal of Educational Research, 115(2), 133-145.
  75. Yalçın, V., Simsar, A., & Dinler, H. (2020). 5-6 Yaş Çocukları için 21. Yy Becerileri Ölçeği (DAY-2): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mediterranean Educational Research Journal/Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(65).
  76. Yang, W. (2024). Coding with robots or tablets? Effects of technology-enhanced embodied learning on preschoolers’ computational thinking and social-emotional competence. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241226459
  77. Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  78. Strawhacker, A. L., & Bers, M. U. (2015). “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing children’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphical, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 293- 319. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9287-7.