KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ağrı / 2020 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of epidural and intravenous route for acute and chronic postoperative pain control in patients with gynecological malignancy

Jinekolojik maligniteli hastalarda akut ve kronik postoperatif ağrı için epidural ve intravenöz yolun karşılaştırılması

Bedih BALKAN
Gökhan DEMİRAYAK
Halil ÇETİNGÖK
Cihan COMBA
Yusuf Ziya YENER
Gülsüm Oya HERGÜNSEL
İsa Aykut ÖZDEMİR
Dergi
Ağrı
Sayfa
91–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The results showed that epidural and intravenous analgesia had a similar effect regarding the chronicity of pain but better outcomes were achieved with epidural analgesia in the acute stage.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study compared the effects of patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients who were operated on for gynecological malignancy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia was administered via epidural route to Group 1 and the intravenous route to Group 2.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The results showed that epidural and intravenous analgesia had a similar effect regarding the chronicity of pain but better outcomes were achieved with epidural analgesia in the acute stage.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study compared the effects of patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients who were operated on for gynecological malignancy. Methods: Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia was administered via epidural route to Group 1 and the intravenous route to Group 2. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the acute phase at postoperative 24 hours and at 6 months in the chronic phase. Results: The VAS scores at 24 hours were lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3.29 vs 3.93; p 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale scores at 6 months (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that epidural and intravenous analgesia had a similar effect regarding the chronicity of pain but better outcomes were achieved with epidural analgesia in the acute stage.

Abstract

Amaç: Jinekolojik malignite nedeniyle ameliyat edilen hastalarda epidural veya intravenöz hasta kontrollü analjezinin akut ve kronik postoperatif ağrı üzerine etkisini karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Postoperatif hasta kontrollü analjezi Grup 1 için epidural yol ve Grup 2 için intravenöz yoldan uygulandı. Ağrı, akut fazda postoperatif 24. saat ve kronik fazda 6. ayda Vizüel Analog Skoru (VAS) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 24. saatte VAS skoru Grup 1’de Grup 2’ye göre daha düşük bulundu (3.29 ve 3.93; p 0.05). Sonuç: Bizim sonuçlarımız, akut dönemde epidural analjezi ile daha iyi sonuçlar elde edilebilmesine rağmen epidural ve intravenöz analjezinin ağrının kronikliği için benzer etkilere sahip olduğunu gösterdi.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BALKAN, B., DEMİRAYAK, G., ÇETİNGÖK, H., COMBA, C., YENER, Y. Z., HERGÜNSEL, G. O., ÖZDEMİR, İ. A. (2020). Comparison of epidural and intravenous route for acute and chronic postoperative pain control in patients with gynecological malignancy. Ağrı, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 91–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/139257

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. Accessed 2015, from https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/ csr/1975_2015/#contents
  2. Ferguson SE, Panzarella T, Lau S, Gien LT, Samouëlian V, Giede C, et al. Prospective cohort study comparing quality of life and sexual health outcomes between women undergoing robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018;149(3):476–83
  3. Fanning J, Yacoub E, Hojat R. Laparoscopic-assisted cytoreduction for primary advanced ovarian cancer: success, morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123(1):47–9
  4. Abitbol J, Cohn R, Hunter S, Rombaldi M, Cohen E, Kessous R, et al. Minimizing pain medication use and its associated costs following robotic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2017;144(1):187–92
  5. Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001;87(1):88–98
  6. Brandsborg B, Nikolajsen L, Hansen CT, Kehlet H, Jensen TS. Risk factors for chronic pain after hysterectomy: a nationwide questionnaire and database study. Anesthesiology 2007;106(5):1003–12
  7. Radresa O, Chauny JM, Lavigne G, Piette E, Paquet J, Daoust R. Current views on acute to chronic pain transition in post-traumatic patients: risk factors and potential for pre-emptive treatments. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76(4):1142–50
  8. Kaye AD, Helander EM, Vadivelu N, Lumermann L, Suchy T, Rose M, et al. Consensus Statement for Clinical Pathway Development for Perioperative Pain Management and Care Transitions. Pain Ther 2017;6(2):129–41
  9. Luo ZD, Chaplan SR, Higuera ES, Sorkin LS, Stauderman KA, Williams ME, et al. Upregulation of dorsal root ganglion (alpha)2(delta) calcium channel subunit and its correlation with allodynia in spinal nerve-injured rats. J Neurosci 2001;21(6):1868–75
  10. Munro A, Sjaus A, George RB. Anesthesia and analgesia for gynecological surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2018;31(3):274–9
  11. Chen LM, Weinberg VK, Chen C, Powell CB, Chen LL, Chan JK, et al. Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115(3):357– 61. 12. de Leon-Casasola OA, Karabella D, Lema MJ. Bowel function recovery after radical hysterectomies: thoracic epidural bupivacaine-morphine versus intravenous patientcontrolled analgesia with morphine: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth 1996;8(2):87–92
  12. Moslemi F, Rasooli S, Baybordi A, Golzari SE. A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Ana