KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Social Justice Leadership in Education: A Suggested Questionnaire

Yuanyuan ZHANG
J. Tim GODDARD
Brittany A. E. JAKUBİEC
Sayfa
53–86
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Principals in high–need communities develop more context-responsive leadership in the effort of creating a democratic and inclusive educational environment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper reports on the development of the revised Social Justice Questionnaire (SJQ2), an instrument which permits the quantitative examination of socially just school leadership.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The SJQ2 is based on data drawn from an exploratory province-wide study to determine to what extent, and how, school principals on Prince Edward Island understand and enact principles of social justice in their work.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Principals in high–need communities develop more context-responsive leadership in the effort of creating a democratic and inclusive educational environment.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015–2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:social justice questionnaire · leadership

Abstract

This paper reports on the development of the revised Social Justice Questionnaire (SJQ2), an instrument which permits the quantitative examination of socially just school leadership. The SJQ2 is based on data drawn from an exploratory province-wide study to determine to what extent, and how, school principals on Prince Edward Island understand and enact principles of social justice in their work. Although this was a ‘stand-alone’ project, the research also provides a Canadian contribution to the International School Leadership Development Network (ISLDN). Project design and implementation, including data collection and analysis, took place in 2015–2017. The researchers utilized a mixed methods approach to glean both qualitative and quantitative data for analysis. The research findings indicated that there is a statistically significant correlation between socially just school leadership and the community context. This research supports and enhances current qualitative studies by adding a statistical perspective to show that effective social justice leadership cannot be segregated from the political, economic, and cultural context of the community. Principals in high–need communities develop more context-responsive leadership in the effort of creating a democratic and inclusive educational environment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZHANG, Y., GODDARD, J. T., JAKUBİEC, B. A. E. (2018). Social Justice Leadership in Education: A Suggested Questionnaire. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 53–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/139228

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Angelle, P. S., Arlestig, H., & Norberg, K. (2016). Identifying social justice leaders: Contextual differences in US and Swedish principals. International Studies in Educational Administration, 43(2), 19–35.
  2. Arar, K., Beycioglu, K., & Oplatka, I. (2017). A cross-cultural of educational leadership for social justice in Israel and Turkey: Meanings, actions and contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 192–206.
  3. Arar, K. H., & Oplatka, I. (2016). Making sense of social justice in education: Jewish and Arableaders’ perspectives in Israel. Management in Education, 30(2), 66–73.
  4. Auerbach, S. (2009). Walking the walk: Portraits in leadership for family engagement in urbanschools. School Community Journal, 19(1), 9–32.
  5. Berkovich, I. (2014). A socio-logical framework of social justice leadership in education. Journalof Educational Administration, 52(3), 282–309.
  6. Bogotch, I. E. (2000). Educational leadership and social justice: Theory into Practice. Journal ofSchool Leadership, 12(2), 138–156.
  7. Boske, C. & Diem, S. (2012). The future of educational leadership preparation: Creating the capacity for caring, equity, and leading for social. In C. Boske, & S. Diem (Eds.), Global leadership for social justice: Taking it from the field to practice (pp. 217–231). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Brown, K. M. (2004). Assessing preservice leaders’ beliefs, attitudes, and values regarding issues of diversity, social justice, and equity: A review of existing measures. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37(4), 332–342.
  8. Brown, K. M. (2006). Leadership for social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 700–745.
  9. Capper, C., Theoharis, G., & Sebastian, J. (2006). Toward a framework for preparing leaders forsocial justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 209–224.
  10. Capper, C. A., & Young, M. D. (2014). Ironies and limitations of educational leadership for social justice: A call to social justice educators. Theory into Practice, 53(2), 158–164.
  11. Chenoweth, K. & Theokas, C. (2013). How high-poverty schools are getting it done.Educational Leadership, 70(7), 56–59.
  12. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399–403.
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L.,