KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Teacher Leadership and Teaming: Creativity within Schools in China

Carol A. MULLEN
Tricia BROWNE-FERRİGNO
Sayfa
231–255
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The popular belief that Chinese education is uniformly creatively impoverished and that schools are nothing but robotic learning environments are dispelled.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Preparing today’s children and youth to become active, responsive adults in transforming global societies requires that schools change dramatically.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To work towards this goal is daunting in light of educational policies and school structures that hinder teamwork and creativity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The popular belief that Chinese education is uniformly creatively impoverished and that schools are nothing but robotic learning environments are dispelled.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:China · Creative Education · Creativity

Abstract

Preparing today’s children and youth to become active, responsive adults in transforming global societies requires that schools change dramatically. To work towards this goal is daunting in light of educational policies and school structures that hinder teamwork and creativity. Despite challenges due to education policies, traditional school structures, and teacher-culture expectations, teacher leadership and teamwork have nonetheless emerged in many countries. This article reports interesting and even surprising preliminary findings about education in China gathered through onsite school observations and interviews with teachers and principals. The popular belief that Chinese education is uniformly creatively impoverished and that schools are nothing but robotic learning environments are dispelled.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MULLEN, C. A., BROWNE-FERRİGNO, T. (2018). Teacher Leadership and Teaming: Creativity within Schools in China. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 231–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/139209

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Angelle, P. S., Arlestig, H., & Norberg, K. (2016). Identifying social justice leaders: Contextual differences in US and Swedish principals. International Studies in Educational Administration, 43(2), 19–35.
  2. Abrami, R., M., Kirby, W. C., & McFarlan, F. W. (2014). Why China can’t innovate. Harvard Business Review, 92(3), 107-111. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/03/why-china-cant-innovate
  3. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and neo-liberal imaginary. New York, NY: Routledge. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities (Report No. 637). London, England: General Teaching Council for Education, Department for Education and Skills. Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2016). Identifying, developing, and empowering leaders for collective school leadership: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(2), 151-157.
  4. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-534).
  5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cheng, H. (2009). Inequality in basic education in China: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Educational Practices, 3(2), 81-106.
  6. Cheng, P. (2014). National survey on suicide problems of primary and secondary school students in 2013. In Y. Dongping (Ed.), Annual report of China’s education (pp. 175-190).
  7. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and innovation. New York, NY: HarperPerennial. Curtis, R. (2013, February). Finding a new way: Leveraging teacher leadership to meet unprecedented demands. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Dewey, J. (1934).
  9. Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books. Dimitrov, M. K. (2013). Understanding communist collapse and resilience. In M. K. Dimitrov (Ed.), Why communism did not collapse: Understanding authoritarian regime resistance in Asia and Europe (pp. 3-39).
  10. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Donohoo, J. A. M. (2017). Collective efficacy: How educators’ beliefs impact student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Draper, J. (2012). Hong Kong: Professional preparation and development of teachers in a market economy. In L. Darling-Hammond & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices (pp. 82-97).
  12. New York, NY: