Dergiler / Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

ABDÜLHAMÃŽD EL-FERHÃŽ VE EMİN AHSEN EL-ISLHÃŽ'NİN GELİŞTİRDİKLERİ KUR'AN TEFSİRİ METODOLOJİSİ

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2001-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Despite the originality of their approach, it isimportant to note that there are some problems which wait to be solved.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Abd al-Hamîd al-Farahî and his pupil Amîn Ahsan al-Islahî are two significant figuresconcerning Qur'anic studies in the Indian subcontinent.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although Farahi did not write anycomplete commentary on the Qur'an, Islahî, who followed and developed his mentor'sprinciples of interpretation, did write a complete commentary which is called Tadabbur-iQur'an.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Despite the originality of their approach, it isimportant to note that there are some problems which wait to be solved.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Abd al-Hamîd al-Farahî and his pupil Amîn Ahsan al-Islahî are two significant figuresconcerning Qur'anic studies in the Indian subcontinent. Although Farahi did not write anycomplete commentary on the Qur'an, Islahî, who followed and developed his mentor'sprinciples of interpretation, did write a complete commentary which is called Tadabbur-iQur'an. This article tries to describe and analyse their methodology in the interpretation ofthe Qur'an and discusses the their general approaches to the Qur'anic surahs. Althoughthere are differences between these two exegetes, it must be said that the methodologythey developed is very original. Both treated the Qur'anic surahs as a coherent unit,therefore they grouped them into different subsections. They found a specific theme ineach section and subsection. Nonetheless, there is a one major theme in each surah andsurah groups which they called amûd. More interestingly, they saw in the Qur'anic surahsnot only thematic but also structural unity. Despite the originality of their approach, it isimportant to note that there are some problems which wait to be solved.

Abstract

Abd al-Hamîd al-Farahî and his pupil Amîn Ahsan al-Islahî are two significant figuresconcerning Qur'anic studies in the Indian subcontinent. Although Farahi did not write anycomplete commentary on the Qur'an, Islahî, who followed and developed his mentor'sprinciples of interpretation, did write a complete commentary which is called Tadabbur-iQur'an. This article tries to describe and analyse their methodology in the interpretation ofthe Qur'an and discusses the their general approaches to the Qur'anic surahs. Althoughthere are differences between these two exegetes, it must be said that the methodologythey developed is very original. Both treated the Qur'anic surahs as a coherent unit,therefore they grouped them into different subsections. They found a specific theme ineach section and subsection. Nonetheless, there is a one major theme in each surah andsurah groups which they called amûd. More interestingly, they saw in the Qur'anic surahsnot only thematic but also structural unity. Despite the originality of their approach, it isimportant to note that there are some problems which wait to be solved.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALBAYRAK, İ. (2001). ABDÜLHAMÃŽD EL-FERHÃŽ VE EMİN AHSEN EL-ISLHÃŽ'NİN GELİŞTİRDİKLERİ KUR'AN TEFSİRİ METODOLOJİSİ. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/138985

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...