KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 69

Örgütsel Kimlik-Rol İçi ve Rol Dışı Performans İlişkisinde İçsel Güdülenmenin Aracılık Rolü

The Mediating Role of Intrinsıc Motivation in the Organizational Identity-in Role and Extra Role Performance Relationship

Muhammet Ali Çelebi(KARAMANOĞLU MEHMETBEY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3892-1879
Fatih Çetin(NİĞDE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2487-9553
Sayfa
135–152
Yayın Tarihi
2021-07-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, örgüte duygusal bağlılığın hem rol içi hem de rol dışı performansı artırdığını göstermiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, örgütsel kimliğin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa olan etkisini incelemek ve bu süreçte içsel güdülenmenin rolünü araştırmaktır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Anket yöntemiyle 592 akademik personelden veri toplanan araştırmada değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler için korelasyon analizi ve hipotez testleri için yapısal eşitlik modelleri kurulmuştur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, örgüte duygusal bağlılığın hem rol içi hem de rol dışı performansı artırdığını göstermiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Örgütsel kimlik · İçsel Güdülenme · Rol-İçi Perdormans

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, örgütsel kimliğin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa olan etkisini incelemek ve bu süreçte içsel güdülenmenin rolünü araştırmaktır. Anket yöntemiyle 592 akademik personelden veri toplanan araştırmada değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler için korelasyon analizi ve hipotez testleri için yapısal eşitlik modelleri kurulmuştur. Ayrıca değişkenler arasındaki dolaylı etkilerin belirlenmesi için aracılık testi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, örgüte duygusal bağlılığın hem rol içi hem de rol dışı performansı artırdığını göstermiştir. Diğer örgütsel kimlik alt boyutları olan kendi kendine kategorizasyon, uyum/örtüşme düzeyi ve davranışsal katılım alt boyutlarının performans üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunamamıştır. Bunun ötesinde örgüte duygusal bağlılık-rol içi performans ilişkisine içsel güdülenmenin aracılık ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Tüm bulgular teorik ve kültürel bağlamda tartışılmıştır.

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to examine the effects of organizational identity on in-role and extra-role performance, and to explore the possible mediating role of intrinsic motivation in this process. The data were collected from 592 academic staff using the survey method. The relationship between study variables was investigated by correlation and structural equation modeling analyses. Moreover, the mediation tests were conducted for determining the indirect effects among variables. The results showed that merely the affective-attachment to organization increases in-role and extra-role performance. We couldn’t find any significant effects of other sub-dimensions i.e. self-categorization, the goodness of fit, and behavioral involvement on in-role and extra-role performance. What’s more it was found that the relationship between affective-attachment and in-role performance is mediated by intrinsic motivation. All these findings were discussed based on theoretical and cultural context.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelebi, M. A., Çetin, F. (2021). Örgütsel Kimlik-Rol İçi ve Rol Dışı Performans İlişkisinde İçsel Güdülenmenin Aracılık Rolü. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 69, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.848633

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (63)

  1. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201.
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.ObO13e31812e5535
  4. Ayçiçeği-Dinn, A., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2011). Individualism–collectivism among Americans, Turks and Turkish immigrants to the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(1), 9-16.
  5. Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., Pohl, S., & Odoardi, C. (2013). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of intrinsic work motivation, Le Travail Humain, 76(3), 205–226.
  6. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
  7. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Borman, W. C., & Motowildo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002
  9. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
  10. Brewer, M. B. (2010). Intergroup relations. Oxford University Press.
  11. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/258391
  12. Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.
  13. Çelebi, M. A. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel kimliğin ve içsel-dışsal güdülenmenin rol içi ve rol dışı performansa etkileri: Konya Ovası Projesi Bölgesi üniversitelerinde bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi.
  14. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-Year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 3(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661.
  15. Çetin, F., & Çelebi, M. A. (2021). Çok boyutlu örgütsel kimlik ölçeği geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 228–243.
  16. Cicero, L., & Pierro, A. (2007). Charismatic leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of employees’ work-group identification. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701248495
  17. Deci, L., & Ryan, M. (2000). The " what " and " why " of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  18. Deschamps, J., & Devos, T. (1998). Regarding the relationship between social identity and personal identity. In In S. WorchelJ. F. Morales & D. Páez (Eds.), Social identity: International Perspectives (pp. 2-12). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446279205.n1.
  19. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393235
  20. Ellemers, N., Gilder, D. De, & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A Social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478.
  21. Fox, S., & Spector, P. E. (2011). Organizational citizenship behavior checklist (OCB-C). Retrieved from http://shell.cas.usf.edu/~pspector/scales/OCB-Cdevelopment.doc
  22. Fuller, B., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1988). Organizational construction of intrinsic motivation Sociological Forum, 3(1), 1–24. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/684619
  23. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
  24. Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/259263.
  25. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
  26. Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations the social identity approach. In Society (Second Edi). London: SAGE Publications.
  27. Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). International review of industrial and organizational psychology. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470029307
  28. Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, (2), 18–31. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2003/01/one-more-time-how-do-you-motivate-employees
  29. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  30. Jones, C., & Volpe, E. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 413–434. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41415676
  31. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk-ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11(37), 36-43.
  32. Kane, R. E., Magnusen, M. J., & Perrewé, P. L. (2012). Differential effects of identification on extra-role behavior. Career Development International, 17(1), 25–42.
  33. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 25(1), 57–78.
  34. Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004
  35. Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2009). Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00103.x
  36. Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012
  37. Leonard, N. H., Beauvais, L. L., & Scholl, R. W. (1999). Work motivation: The incorporation of self-cencept-based process. Human Relations, 52(8), 969–998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200801
  38. Li, Y., Wei, F., Ren, S., & Di, Y. (2015). Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(4), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0318
  39. Ma, B., Liu, S., Liu, D., & Wang, H. (2016). Job security and work performance in Chinese employees: The mediating role of organisational identification. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12137
  40. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  41. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002
  42. Motowidlo, S. J., & Scotter, J. R. Van. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480.
  43. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
  44. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  45. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
  46. Riketta, M., & Dick, R. Van. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 490–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001
  47. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  49. Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/259262
  50. Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior Volume One: Micro Approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 427–447). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200455
  51. Stoner, J., Perrewé, P. L., & Hofacker, C. (2011). The development and validation of the multi-dimensional identification scale (MDIS). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1632–1658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00770.x
  52. Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of ‘La catégorisation sociale’. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272–302). Paris: Larousse.
  53. Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
  54. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  55. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of personality, 69(6), 907-924.
  56. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscoveringthe social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwel
  57. Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000889
  58. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904774202135
  59. Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology An International Review, 49(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00020
  60. Wharton, A. S. (1992). The social construction of gender and race in organizations: A social identity and group mobilization perspective. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 10(1992), 55-84.
  61. Yousaf, A., Yang, H., & Sanders, K. (2015). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task and contextual performance of Pakistani professionals. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2012-0277
  62. Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., Pohl, S., & Odoardi, C. (2013). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of intrinsic work motivation, Le Travail Humain, 76(3), 205–226.
  63. Deci, L., & Ryan, M. (2000). The " what " and " why " of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.