KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Current Research in Social Sciences / 2025 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Gruplar Arası Köklenmiş Çatışmalarda İç Grup Özdeşiminin Potansiyel Rolü

The Potential Role of Ingroup Identification in Rooted Intergroup Conflicts

Sami Çoksan(ERZURUM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF LETTERS, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY)0000-0003-2942-1506
Sayfa
311–324
Yayın Tarihi
2025-11-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Makale, bu süreci destekleyecek şekilde yapılandırılmış aşamalı bir müdahale ön-modeli sunmakta ve bu modelin, grup kimliğinin bireysel benlik üzerindeki baskın etkisini azaltarak çözüm odaklı bilişsel yeniden yapılanmayı destekleyebileceğini ileri sürmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Son yıllarda gruplar arası çatışma literatüründe, uzun süreli, derinleşmiş ve şiddet içeren gruplar arası anlaşmazlıkların çözümüne yönelik stratejiler öne çıkmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu makalede, bu tür çatışmalar bağlamında, avantajlı grup üyelerinde grup içi özdeşleşmenin azaltılmasının çatışma çözüm stratejilerinin etkinliğini nasıl artırabileceği tartışılmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Makale, bu süreci destekleyecek şekilde yapılandırılmış aşamalı bir müdahale ön-modeli sunmakta ve bu modelin, grup kimliğinin bireysel benlik üzerindeki baskın etkisini azaltarak çözüm odaklı bilişsel yeniden yapılanmayı destekleyebileceğini ileri sürmektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Çatışmanın Azaltılması · Çatışma Çözümü · Özdeşleşme

Özet

Son yıllarda gruplar arası çatışma literatüründe, uzun süreli, derinleşmiş ve şiddet içeren gruplar arası anlaşmazlıkların çözümüne yönelik stratejiler öne çıkmaktadır. Ancak bu çalışmaların büyük bölümü, homojen yapıya sahip gruplar arasında gerçekleşen ve şiddet döngüsünün büyük ölçüde yatıştığı çatışma örneklerine odaklanmakta; asimetrik güç ilişkilerinin ve temsiliyet eşitsizliklerinin belirleyici olduğu bağlamları yeterince dikkate almamaktadır. Bu makalede, bu tür çatışmalar bağlamında, avantajlı grup üyelerinde grup içi özdeşleşmenin azaltılmasının çatışma çözüm stratejilerinin etkinliğini nasıl artırabileceği tartışılmaktadır. Makalede grup içi özdeşleşmenin; iç grubun benzersizliği, dış grubun homojenliği ve gruplar arası değer farklılıklarına dair algılar yoluyla çatışmayı pekiştirdiği savunularak, bu algıların zayıflatılması durumunda, sosyal adalet, olumlu gruplar arası temas, yapıcı diyalog, müzakere ve arabuluculuk, yeniden kategorizasyon ve dekategorizasyon gibi stratejilerin daha etkili hâle geleceği öne sürülmektedir. Makale, bu süreci destekleyecek şekilde yapılandırılmış aşamalı bir müdahale ön-modeli sunmakta ve bu modelin, grup kimliğinin bireysel benlik üzerindeki baskın etkisini azaltarak çözüm odaklı bilişsel yeniden yapılanmayı destekleyebileceğini ileri sürmektedir.

Abstract

In recent years, the literature on intergroup conflict has increasingly focused on strategies aimed at resolving long-standing, deep-rooted, and violent intergroup disputes. However, the majority of these studies concentrate on conflict cases that occur between relatively homogeneous groups and in which cycles of violence have largely subsided, failing to adequately consider contexts where asymmetrical power relations and representational inequalities are central. This article examines how reducing ingroup identification among members of advantaged groups can enhance the effectiveness of conflict resolution strategies in such contexts. It argues that ingroup identification reinforces conflict through perceptions of ingroup uniqueness, outgroup homogeneity, and value-based differentiation between groups. When these perceptions are weakened, strategies such as social justice initiatives, positive intergroup contact, constructive dialogue, negotiation and mediation, as well as recategorization and decategorization, may become more effective. The article presents a structured, stepwise pre-intervention model designed to support this process and suggests that reducing the dominance of social identity within individual self-concept can facilitate cognitively grounded, solution-oriented reappraisal and change.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çoksan, S. (2025). Gruplar Arası Köklenmiş Çatışmalarda İç Grup Özdeşiminin Potansiyel Rolü. Current Research in Social Sciences, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 311–324. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1741232

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (79)

  1. Al‐Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D., & Cardis, P. A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally love‐deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24(4), 427-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724950240405
  2. Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Introduction: Conflicts and social psychology. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 1-38). Psychology Press.
  3. Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D. A., & Tsang, J.-A. (2002). Empathy and altruism. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 485–498). Oxford University Press.
  4. Boldry, J. G., Gaertner, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207075153
  5. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
  6. Brewer, M. B. (2011). Identity and conflict. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 125-144). Psychology Press.
  7. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 256-345). Elsevier Academic Press.
  8. Burton, J. W. (1987). Resolving deep-rooted conflict: A handbook. University Press of America Cehajic, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29(3), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00634.x
  9. Çoksan, S., Cingöz-ulu, B., Sayılan, G., & Solak, N. (2022). İç grup özdeşimi ve iç grup yanlılığı: Grup normlarının rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(1), 261-300. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1037698
  10. Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a metaframework. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327949PAC0901_01
  11. Coleman, P. T. (2006). Intractable conflict. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice 2nd edition (pp. 533-559). Josses-Bass.
  12. Cook, S. W. (1985). Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40(4), 452-460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.4.452
  13. Cook-Huffman, C. (2009). The role of identity in conflict. In D. J. D. Sandole, S.Byrne, I. Sandole-Strateste, & J. Senehi (Eds.), Handbook of conflict analysis and resolution (pp. 19-31). Routledge.
  14. Cordell, K., & Wolff, S. (2013). The study of ethnic conflict: An introduction. In K. Cordell & S. Wolff (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ethnic conflict (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
  15. Corenblum, B., & Stephan, W. G. (2001). White fears and native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 251-268.
  16. Crisp, R., Ensari, N., Hewstone, M., & Miller, N. (2003). A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 35-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000091
  17. David, O., & Bar-Tal, D. (2009). A sociopsychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity as an example. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 354-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309344412
  18. Deutsch, M. (1999). A personal perspective on the development of social psychology in the twentieth century. In Rodriguez, A. and Levine, R. V. (Eds.), Reflections on 100 years of experimental social psychology, (pp. 1-34). Basic Books.
  19. Dovidio, J. F., Saguy, T., & Shnabel, N. (2009). Cooperation and conflict within groups: Bridging intragroup and intergroup processes. Journal of Social Issues, 65(2), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01607.x
  20. Fisher, R. J. & Kelman, H. C. (2011). Perceptions in conflict. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 61-82). Psychology Press.
  21. Fisher, R. J. (1990). Introduction: The pervasive enigma of intergroup conflict. In R. J. Fisher (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup and international conflict resolution (pp. 1-20). Springer-Verlag.
  22. Foddy, M., Platow, M. J., & Yamagishi, T. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20(4), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x
  23. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
  24. Gibson, J. L. (2004). Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation? HSRC Press
  25. Granberg, D. (1987). Candidate preference, membership group, and estimates of voting behavior. Social Cognition, 5(4), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1987.5.4.323
  26. Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333(6050), 1767-1769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925
  27. Hammond, W. R., & Yung, B. (1993). Psychology's role in the public health response to assaultive violence among young African-American men. American Psychologist, 48(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.2.142
  28. Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
  29. Hassouna, S. (2016). Spaces for dialogue in a segregated landscape: A study on the current joint efforts for peace in the Israeli‐Palestinian conflict. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 34(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21169
  30. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
  31. Hewstone, M. & Lord, C. G. (1998). Changing intergroup cognition, and intergroup behavior: The role of typicality. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 367-392). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  32. Hill, H. M., Soriano, F. I., Chen, S. A., & LaFromboise, T. D. (1994). Sociocultural factors in the etiology and prevention of violence among ethnic minority youth. In L. D. Eron, J. H. Gentry, & P. Schlegel (Eds.), Reason to hope: A psychosocial perspective on violence & youth (pp. 59-97). APA. https://doi.org/10.1037/10164-002
  33. Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.241
  34. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: a meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 862-879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
  35. Jonas, K. J. (2009). Interventions enhancing intergroup tolerance. In S. Otten, K. Sassenberg, & T. Kessler (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 284-303). Psychology Press.
  36. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
  37. Kaufman, S. J. (2013). Ethnicity as a generator of conflict. In K. Cordell & S. Wolff (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ethnic conflict (pp. 91-102). Routledge.
  38. Kelman, H. C. (1992). Informal mediation by the scholar/practitioner. In J. Bercovitch & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Mediation in international relations (pp. 64-96). Palgrave.
  39. Kelman, H. C. (2007). Social-psychological dimensions of international conflict. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods & techniques, revised edition (pp.61-110). United States Institute of Peace.
  40. Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.002
  41. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
  42. Kriesberg, L. (1998). Intractable conflicts. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332–342). The Continuum Publishing Company.
  43. Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 78-85 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.78
  44. Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B.,. & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-grop identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144.
  45. Lim, M., Metzler, R., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2007). Global pattern formation and ethnic/cultural violence. Science, 317(5844), 1540-1544. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142734
  46. Linville, P. W., & Fischer, G. W. (1998). Group variability and covariation: Effects on intergroup judgment and behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp 123-150). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  47. Mallett, R. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2010). Increasing positive intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 382-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.006
  48. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 387-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00267 395-396
  49. Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review, 95(3), 796-816. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201468
  50. Niv-Solomon, A. (2016). Cooperation and protracted conflict in international affairs: Cycles of reciprocity. Springer.
  51. Pedersen, P. (2006). Multicultural conflict resolution. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice 2nd edition (pp. 649-670). Josses-Bass.
  52. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
  53. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice: Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), "The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology" Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93-114). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  54. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  55. Pratto, F., & Glassford, D. E. (2008). How needs can motivate intergroup reconciliation in the face of intergroup conflict. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 117-144). Oxford University Press.
  56. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
  57. Pruitt, D. G. (2011). Negotiation and mediation in intergroup conflict. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 267-290). Psychology Press.
  58. Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement, 3rd edition. Mcgraw-Hill.
  59. Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five‐step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1313-1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00113.x
  60. Reykowski, J., & Cislak, A. (2011). Socio-psychological approaches to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 241-266). Psychology Press.
  61. Riketta, M. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.234
  62. Rosenberg, M. B. (2005). Speak peace in a world of conflict. PD Press.
  63. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20(1), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
  64. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1021-1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209336610
  65. Staub, E. (1998). Breaking the cycle of genocidal violence: Healing and reconciliation. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Death, dying, and bereavement. Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 231-238). Brunner/Mazel.
  66. Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil: Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others. Cambridge University Press.
  67. Staub, E., & Pearlman, L. A. (2001). Healing, reconciliation and forgiving after genocide and other collective violence. In G. R. Helmick & R. L. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy and conflict transformation, (pp. 205-229). Templeton Foundation Press.
  68. Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30(2), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.003
  69. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275007
  70. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
  71. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411
  72. Tyler, T. R. (2013). Justice. In J. M. Levine (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 111-134). Psychology Press.
  73. Weingarten, K. (2003). Common shock: Witnessing violence every day. DP Books.
  74. Worchel, S., & Coutant, D. K. (2008). Between conflict and reconciliation: Toward a theory of peaceful coexistence. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 423-446). Oxford University Press.
  75. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90.
  76. Zartman, I. W. (1996). Bargaining and conflict resolution. In E. A. Kolodziej & R. E. Kanet (Eds.), Coping with conflict after the Cold War (pp. 271-290). John Hopkins.
  77. Zartman, W. (1977). Negotiation as a joint decision-making process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(4), 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277702100405
  78. Zuniga, X., Lopez, G. E., & Ford, K. A. (2014). Introducing the practice and research on intergroup dialogue. In X. Zuniga, G. E. Lopez, & K. A. Ford (Eds.), Intergroup dialogue: Engaging difference, social identities and social justice (pp. 1-24). Routledge.
  79. Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B.,. & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-grop identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144.