KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2015 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Response to Intervention: Early Identification of Students with Learning Disabilities

Orhan CAKİROGLU
Sayfa
170–182
Yayın Tarihi
2015-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, future research directions in the area of special education within a model of RtI are discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The number of students with learning disabilities (LD) has grown substantially in the last three decades.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:These students account for more than half of the special education programs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, future research directions in the area of special education within a model of RtI are discussed.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Response to intervention · learning disabilities · early identification

Özet

Öz The number of students with learning disabilities (LD) has grown substantially in the last three decades. These students account for more than half of the special education programs. As with the growing number, there is a great debate on the identification procedures of students with LD during early years. One of the models to early identify students with disabilities is Response to Intervention (RtI). The purpose of this article is to describe RtI on the identification of students with learning disabilities (LD) in the early years of childhood. First, a brief overview of RtI is provided, including the most popular models. Next, utilization of RtI in the identification of LD is described. Then, an overview of approaches that RtI is used to maximize achievement for a wide range of students is provided. Finally, future research directions in the area of special education within a model of RtI are discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAKİROGLU, O. (2015). Response to Intervention: Early Identification of Students with Learning Disabilities. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 170–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/137812

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
  2. Barnes, A. C., & Harlacher, J. E. (2008). Clearing the confusion: RTI as a set of principles. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 417-431.
  3. Batsche, G. M., Elliot, J., Graden, J., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Blanchett, W. J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging in the role of White privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35, 24-28.
  4. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention: 1997 to 2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 8-12.
  5. Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Solution focused psycho-educational reports. In, R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem solving approach (pp. 267-290). New York: Guilford. Calhoon, M. B. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424-433.
  6. Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to- instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32, 557- 582. Chambers, J.G., Shkolnik, J., & Perez, M. (2003). Special education expenditure report: Total expenditures for students with disabilities, 1999-2000: Spending variation by disability. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research. Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288–310.
  7. Feiker, H. A. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness to intervention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 137-146.
  8. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to- intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
  9. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 92-99. Fuch