KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness and EFL Listening Performance: Focusing on IELTS Higher and Lower Scorers

Mansoor Tavakoli
Sara Hashemi Shahraki
Mohsen Rezazadeh
Sayfa
24–37
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results suggested that (1) listeners' metacognitive awareness had a positive relationship with the listening test performance; (2) more-proficient listeners reported significantly higher use of Problem Solving and Directed Attention strategies than the less-proficient listeners; (3) less-proficient listeners tended to use Mental Translation strategy; and (4) there was no difference between the more-proficient and the less-proficient listeners in Planning and Evaluation and Person Knowledge.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate the relationship between the learners' metacognitive awareness (Planning and Evaluation, Problem Solving, Directed Attention, Mental Translation and Person Knowledge) and their performance on the listening section of IELTS.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Based on their performance on the IELTS test, the participants were identified as less (N=34) or more-proficient (N=32) listeners.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results suggested that (1) listeners' metacognitive awareness had a positive relationship with the listening test performance; (2) more-proficient listeners reported significantly higher use of Problem Solving and Directed Attention strategies than the less-proficient listeners; (3) less-proficient listeners tended to use Mental Translation strategy; and (4) there was no difference between the more-proficient and the less-proficient listeners in Planning and Evaluation and Person Knowledge.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:listening test performance · metacognitive awareness · metacognitive strategies

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between the learners' metacognitive awareness (Planning and Evaluation, Problem Solving, Directed Attention, Mental Translation and Person Knowledge) and their performance on the listening section of IELTS. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative data analyses. Based on their performance on the IELTS test, the participants were identified as less (N=34) or more-proficient (N=32) listeners. The listeners' perceived use of metacognitive strategies was measured using Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal, and Tafaghodtari (2006) Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire. Two less- and two more-proficient listeners were randomly selected from among the participants to participate in a stimulated recall session on their IELTS responses. The results suggested that (1) listeners' metacognitive awareness had a positive relationship with the listening test performance; (2) more-proficient listeners reported significantly higher use of Problem Solving and Directed Attention strategies than the less-proficient listeners; (3) less-proficient listeners tended to use Mental Translation strategy; and (4) there was no difference between the more-proficient and the less-proficient listeners in Planning and Evaluation and Person Knowledge.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tavakoli, M., Shahraki, S. H., Rezazadeh, M. (2016). The Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness and EFL Listening Performance: Focusing on IELTS Higher and Lower Scorers. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 24–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/137749

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Abanomey, A. A. (2002). The effect of texts’ authenticity on reading-comprehension test-taking strategies used by adult Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe. Alderson J. C. & Banerjee J. (2002). Language testing and assessment (Part 2). Language Teaching, 35, 79–113.
  2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Bachman, L. F. (1991).What does language testing have to offer? TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 671–704.
  4. Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.) Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman. Bernhardt, E. B. (2000). Second language reading as a case study of reading scholarship in the 20th century. In M. Kamil & P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, editors, Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 791–811).
  6. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen, editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 32–70).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Chemers, M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55–64.
  9. Cohen, A. D. (2006). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(4), 307–331.
  10. Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. Jerusalem: Jacob Hiatt Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED163753). Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Princeton, NJ: ETS. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
  11. Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Forster, D. E., & Karn, R. (1998). Teaching TOEIC/TOEFL test-taking strategies. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Seattle, WA, March 17–21, 1998. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427543) Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. (1989)