KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

An Investigation of Group Invariance in Test Equating According to Gender

Hatice İNAL
Çiğdem AKIN ARIKAN
Sayfa
128–145
Yayın Tarihi
2017-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Eventually, group invariance condition was met for Tucker observed score equating, but not for Levine observed score equating.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to investigate the group invariance condition according to Tucker and Levine observed score equating among linear equating methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the study, the 4th and 6th booklets of the PISA 2012 Mathematics subtest were used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Eventually, group invariance condition was met for Tucker observed score equating, but not for Levine observed score equating.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Equating · group invariance · Tucker linear equating

Özet

The aim of this study is to investigate the group invariance condition according to Tucker and Levine observed score equating among linear equating methods. In the study, the 4th and 6th booklets of the PISA 2012 Mathematics subtest were used. Booklets were equated according to group and gender sub-variables, and then group invariance of each condition and WMSE values were calculated. Within this scope, REMSD and RMSD (x) group invariance indexes were employed. The results of the study indicated that, when WMSE values, obtained according to equating methods, were compared, Tucker observed score equating method with regard to whole-group and gender sub-groups produced the lowest error. When RMSD and REMSD values obtained according to gender sub-groups were examined by linear equating methods, it was found that group invariance value is smaller than criterion value for Tucker equating method, while it was greater than criterion value for Levine equating method. Eventually, group invariance condition was met for Tucker observed score equating, but not for Levine observed score equating.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İNAL, H., ARIKAN, Ç. A. (2017). An Investigation of Group Invariance in Test Equating According to Gender. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 128–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/137352

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akhun, İ. (1984). İki korelasyon katsayısı arasındaki manidarlığın test edilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 17, 1-7.
  2. Angoff, W. (1996). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. Educational Measurement: Theories and Applications, 2, 121. Atalay Kabasakal, K. (2014). Değişen madde fonksiyonunun test eşitlemeye etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  3. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  4. Baykul, Y. (1996). İstatistik: Metodlar ve uygulamalar (3. Baskı). Ankara:
  5. Anı Yayıncılık Babcock, B., Albano, A., & Raymond, M. (2012). Nominal weights mean equating: A method for very small samples. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 608-628.
  6. Bozdağ, S., & Kan, A. (2010). Şans başarısının test eşitlemeye etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 91-108.
  7. Braun, H. I., & Holland, P. W. (1982). Observed-score test equating: A mathematical analysis of some ETS equating procedures. Test equating, 1982, 9-49.
  8. Chen, H., Cui, Z., Zhu, R., & Gao, X. (2010). Evaluating the effects of differences in group abilities on the Tucker and the Levine observed-score methods for common-item nonequivalent groups equating. ACT Research Report Series (2010-(1)). Iowa City, IA: ACT. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart& Winston. Demir, S., & Güler, N. (2014). Ortak maddeli denk olmayan gruplar desenine ilişkin test eşitleme çalışması. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 190-208.
  9. Dorans, N. J. (2004). Using subpopulation invariance to assess test score equity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 43-68.
  10. Dorans, N. J. (2008). Three facets of fairness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York. Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and the equitability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Measurement, 37, 281-306.
  11. Dorans, N. J., Holland, P. W., Thayer, D. T., & Tateneni, K. (2003). Invariance of score linking across gender group for three Advanced Placement Program examinations. In N. J. Dorans (Ed.). Population invariance o f score linking: Theory and applications to Advanced Placement Program examinations (RR-03-27).
  12. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Dorans, N. J., Liu, J., & Hammond, S. (2008). Anchor test type and population invariance: An exploration across subpopulations and test administrations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32