Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Big Fish-Little Pond Effect on Affective Factors Based on PISA 2012 Mathematics Achievement

Sayfa
1–14
Yayın Tarihi
2017-04-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results provide evidence about the Anatolian high schools’ students experience big fish-little pond effect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the 2012 PISA Turkey student questionnaire data is considered to determine the big fish-little pond effect.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total number of 771 students from 88 high schools are in the sample.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results provide evidence about the Anatolian high schools’ students experience big fish-little pond effect.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Big fish-little pond effect · mathematics self-efficacy · anxiety

Özet

In this study, the 2012 PISA Turkey student questionnaire data is considered to determine the big fish-little pond effect. The mathematics self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety affective factors are examined to explain the relation of each of them with the school type, gender, socioeconomic status, student’s mathematics achievement and school’s mathematics achievement covariates. A total number of 771 students from 88 high schools are in the sample. Factor analyses’ results support the construct validity of the Student Questionnaire’s mathematics self-efficacy, anxiety and self-concept items. Data set is analyzed with Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause Model and the patterns of association with covariates and affective factors were tested simultaneously. According to the results, Anatolian high school students have a higher mathematics self-efficacy and lower mathematics anxiety than do the general high school students. However, when the student mathematics achievement and school mathematics achievement variables were inserted to the model, school type was not associated with mathematics self-efficacy. Moreover, Anatolian high school student’s mathematics anxiety was higher than that of the general high school students. Student’s mathematics achievement was the most significant predictor of the mathematics self-efficacy, anxiety and self-concept factors. Finally, school’s mathematics achievement was a significant predictor of only mathematics self-concept. The identification of increase in school’s mathematics achievement yields a decrease in the student’s mathematics self-concept may be considered as the most important result of this study. These results provide evidence about the Anatolian high schools’ students experience big fish-little pond effect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALAYCIOĞLU, D. B. (2017). The Big Fish-Little Pond Effect on Affective Factors Based on PISA 2012 Mathematics Achievement. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/137347

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Alcı, B., Erden, M., & Baykal, A. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin matematik başarıları ile algıladıkları problem çözme becerileri, özyeterlik algıları, bilişüstü özdüzenleme stratejileri ve ÖSS sayısal puanları arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı ilişkiler örüntüsü. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 25(2), 53-68.
  2. Altun, F., & Yazıcı, H. (2013). Ergenlerin benlik algılarının yordayıcıları olarak: akademik öz-yeterlik inancı ve akademik başarı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(1), 145-156.
  3. Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181-185.
  4. Baloglu, M., & Kocak, R. (2006). A multivariate investigation of the differences in mathematics anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1325-1335.
  5. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  6. Bong, M. (1998). Personal factors affecting the generality of academic self-efficacy judgments: Gender, ethnicity, and relative expertise. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 315–331.
  7. Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094 Chiu, M. M., & Xihua, Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18, 321-336. doi:110.1016/j.learningstruc.2007.06.003 Cooper, S. E., & Robinson, D. A. (1989). The influence of gender and anxiety on mathematics performance. Journal of College Student Development, 30(5), 459-461.
  8. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
  9. Geist, E. (2010). The anti-anxiety curriculum: Combating math anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(1), 24-31.
  10. Hammouri, H. (2010). Attitudinal and motivational variables related to mathematics achievement in Jordan: findings from the TIMSS. Educational Research, 46(3), 241-257. doi:10.1080/0013188042000277313 Hattie, J. A. (1992).
  11. Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46.
  12. Ho, E. S. (2009). Characteristics of East Asian learners: what we learned from PISA. Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 327-348.
  13. Ho, H., Senturk, D., Lam, A. G., Zimmer, J. M., Hong, S., Okamoto, Y., Chiu,