Dergiler / AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33

Trade-Offs Computing Minimum Hub Cover Toward Optimized Labeled Graph Query Processing

Sayfa
39–68
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We present a computational characterization of minimum hub cover based on integer programming to substantiate our claim and investigate its computational cost on various graph types.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz As techniques for graph query processing mature, the need for optimization is increasingly becoming an imperative.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Indices are one of the key ingredients toward efficient query processing strategies via cost-based optimization.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We present a computational characterization of minimum hub cover based on integer programming to substantiate our claim and investigate its computational cost on various graph types.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler graph query processing · minimum hub cover problem · linear relaxation

Özet

Öz As techniques for graph query processing mature, the need for optimization is increasingly becoming an imperative. Indices are one of the key ingredients toward efficient query processing strategies via cost-based optimization. Due to the apparent absence of a common representation model, it is difficult to make a focused effort toward developing access structures, metrics to evaluate query costs, and choose alternatives. In this context, recent interests in covering-based graph matching appears to be a promising direction of research. In this paper, our goal is to formally introduce a new graph representation model, called Minimum Hub Cover, and demonstrate that this representation offers interesting strategic advantages, facilitates construction of candidate graphs from graph fragments, and helps leverage indices in novel ways for query optimization. However, like other covering problems, minimum hub cover is NP-hard, and thus is a natural candidate for optimization. We claim that computing the minimum hub cover leads to substantial cost reduction for graph query processing. We present a computational characterization of minimum hub cover based on integer programming to substantiate our claim and investigate its computational cost on various graph types.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YELBAY, B., BİRBİL, Ş. İ., BÜLBÜL, K., JAMİL, H. M. (2018). Trade-Offs Computing Minimum Hub Cover Toward Optimized Labeled Graph Query Processing. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 33, 39–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/137091

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. S. Abiteboul and J. V. den Bussche. Deep equality revisited. In DOOD, pages 213–228, 1995.
  2. S. Amin, J. Russell L. Finley, and H. M. Jamil. Top-k similar graph matching using TraM in biological networks. ACM/IEEE TCBB, 2012. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TCBB.2012.90.
  3. Z. N. Azimi, P. Toth, and L. Galli. An electromagnetism metaheuristic for the unicost set covering problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 205:290–300, 2010.
  4. S. Balaji, V. Swaminathan, and K. Kannan. Optimization of unweighted minimum vertex cover. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 67:508–513, 2010. R. Bar-Yehuda and S. Even. A linear-time approximation algorithm for the weighted vertex cover problem. Journal of Algorithms, 2:198–203, 1981.
  5. P. Boldi, M. Santini, and S. Vigna. A deeper investigation of page rank as a function of the damping factor. In Web Information Retrieval and Linear Algebra Algorithms, 2007.
  6. A. Caprara, P. Toth, and M. Fischetti. Algorithms for the set covering problem. Annals of Operations Research, 98:353–371, 2000. M. Caserta. Metaheuristics: progress in complex systems optimization, chapter 3, pages 43– Springer, Berlin, 2007.
  7. C. Chen, X. Yan, P. S. Yu, J. Han, D.-Q. Zhang, and X. Gu. Towards graph containment search and indexing. In VLDB, pages 926–937, 2007. J. Chen and I. A. Kanj. On approximating minimum vertex cover for graphs with perfect matching. Theor. Comput. Sci., 337(1-3):305–318, 2005. S. M. Chung. Indexed extendible hashing. Inf. Process. Lett., 44(1):1–6, 1992.
  8. L. P. Cordella, P. Foggia, C. Sansone, and M. Vento. Performance evaluation of the vf graph matching algorithm. In Image Analysis and Processing, pages 1172–1177, 1999. E. Dolan and J. More. Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Mathematical Programming, 91:201–213,2002. I. Evans. Evolutionary algorithms for vertex cover. In 7th Annual Conference Evolutionary Programming, pages 377–386, New York, 1998. T. A. Feo and M. Resende. A probabilistic heuristic for a computationally difficult set covering problem. Operations Research Letters, 8:67–71, 1989.
  9. F. Fouss, A. Pirotte, J.-M. Renders, and M. Saerens. Random-walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation. TKDE, 19(3):355– 369, 2007. R. Giugno and D. Shasha. GraphGrep: A fast and universal method for querying graphs. In ICPR, volume 2, pages 112–115, 2002.
  10. F. Gomes, C. Meneses, P. Pardalos, and G. Viana. Experimental analy