KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tarih Okulu Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 47

DISCOURSIVE CONSTRAINTS OF TRANSLATING FANTASTIC LITERATURE

Sevcan YILMAZ KUTLAY
Sayfa
2739–2755
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although discoursive elements can be constraints or challenges for translators; as Anthony Pym (1992) offers translation is a potential tool, “a discovery procedure of intercultural Discourse Analysis” (p.235).This article aims to question the discoursive constraints and Discourse Analysis in translation of fantastic literature after discussing the scope and nature of fantastic literature.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In Translation Studies, discourse has generally been discussed as a part of the binary opposition of “form versus content” or “structure versus meaning” and at the end of this discussion, challenging discourse elements of some genres (especially poetic discourse) have been often considered untranslatable.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:With the goal of arousing uncanny, fantastic literature as a literary genre needs hesitation and a familiar kind of strangeness.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although discoursive elements can be constraints or challenges for translators; as Anthony Pym (1992) offers translation is a potential tool, “a discovery procedure of intercultural Discourse Analysis” (p.235).This article aims to question the discoursive constraints and Discourse Analysis in translation of fantastic literature after discussing the scope and nature of fantastic literature.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In Translation Studies, discourse has generally been discussed as a part of the binary opposition of “form versus content” or “structure versus meaning” and at the end of this discussion, challenging discourse elements of some genres (especially poetic discourse) have been often considered untranslatable. With the goal of arousing uncanny, fantastic literature as a literary genre needs hesitation and a familiar kind of strangeness. While discoursive elements such as idiolects, sociolects, fictional constructed languages (conLang) and specifically designed proper names, special terminology of fantastic can help construct this strangeness, they evoke some challenges for translators. Although discoursive elements can be constraints or challenges for translators; as Anthony Pym (1992) offers translation is a potential tool, “a discovery procedure of intercultural Discourse Analysis” (p.235).This article aims to question the discoursive constraints and Discourse Analysis in translation of fantastic literature after discussing the scope and nature of fantastic literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUTLAY, S. Y. (2020). DISCOURSIVE CONSTRAINTS OF TRANSLATING FANTASTIC LITERATURE. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 47, 2739–2755. https://ajindex.com/articles/136586

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Armando, L. (n.d.) Terror, fascination, uncertainity: a reading of Freud’s paper ‘das unheimliche’. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/8840606/terror _fascination_uncertainity_a_reading_of_Freud_s_paper_das_unheimliche_. Access date: 19.05.2020.
  2. Aslan Ayar, P. (2018). Türkçe Edebiyatta Varla Yok Arası bir Tür: Fantastik Roman (1876-1960).
  3. İletişim. Baudou, J. (2005).
  4. Bilim Kurgu. Dost yayinevi. Broadway, C.Q. (2013).What’s in a name: translating proper nouns in the Hobbit. The One Ring. https://www.theonering.net/torwp/2013/ 05/05/ 71399-whats-in-a-name-translating-proper-nouns-in-the-hobbit/.Access date: 19.05.2020.
  5. Borghart, P. & Madelein, C. (2003). The return of the key: the uncanny in the Fantastic. Image&Narrative. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/uncanny/ borghartmadelein.htm. Access date: 12.03.2020.
  6. Boyle, K. (2017). The Rhetoric of Humor: a Bedford Spotlight Reader. St. Martin's. Britton, S. (2018). Thoughtful Laughter: Fantasy and Satire as Social Commentary in Terry Pratchett’s Discworld.The University of North Carolina at Asheville. Butnaru, N.L. (2016). Means of preserving intentionality and functionality in constructed language translation analyses: a study on Kálmán Kalocsay’s Esperanto poem “Somernokto”.Interstudia (Revista Centrului Interdisciplinar de Studiu al Formelor Discursive Contemporane Interstud)(19), 91-100.
  7. Clute, J. & Grant, J. (Eds.) (1997). The Encyclopedia of Fantasy. Orbit Books.Cockney. (n.d.). in Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockney.Access date: 10.06.2020.
  8. Derrida, J. (1980). The law of genre. Glyph,1(7), 202-232.
  9. Fabre Martinez, M.P. & Matou, F. (Ed) (2019). In a Stranger Field.Studies of Art,Audiovisuals and New Technologies On Fantasy, Scifi and Horror Genres.https://www.academia.edu/41347070/In_a_Stranger_Field._Studies_of_Art_Audiovisuals_and_New_Technologies.Access date: 19.05.2020. Fantastic Literature. (n.d.). in Art and Popular Culture. http://www.artand popularculture.com/Fantastic_literature.Access date: 10.05.2020.
  10. Fernandes, L. (2006). Translation of names in children’s fantasy literature: bringing young reader into play. New Voices in Translation Studies1(2), 44-57.
  11. Firth, J. R. (1951). Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951.
  12. Oxford University press. Freud, S. (2002). Totem ve Tabu. (K.Sahir Sel, Trans.). Sosyal yayinlar. (Original work published 1989).
  13. Goldberg, S. (n.d.). Escape from the spiderhead. Plato.https://www.plato-philosophy.org/teachertoolkit/escape-from-spiderhead/.Access date: