KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 66 Issue: 1

Determination of efficient CIDR application periods in timed artificial insemination of Damascus goats during the breeding season

Gökhan Doğruer
Fikret Karaca
Ece Koldaş Ürer
Nurdan Coşkun
Ayşe Merve Köse
Cafer Tayyar Ateş
Oğuzhan Özcan
M. Kemal Sarıbay
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further studies with a larger number of animals are needed to clarify the questions about fertility and economic issues.   

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research was conducted to determine the most efficient CIDR application periods in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols in Damascus goats during the breeding season.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:CIDR was used for 18, 12, 6 and 3 days in groups VL, L, S, and VS, respectively. 500 IU of eCG and 125 mcg of cloprostenol were administered on the day of CIDR removal.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further studies with a larger number of animals are needed to clarify the questions about fertility and economic issues.   
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:CIDR · goat · timed artificial insemination

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the most efficient CIDR application periods in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols in Damascus goats during the breeding season. Ninety-six Damascus goats were used and the animals were randomly allocated into four equal groups. CIDR was used for 18, 12, 6 and 3 days in groups VL, L, S, and VS, respectively. 500 IU of eCG and 125 mcg of cloprostenol were administered on the day of CIDR removal. The goats were timely inseminated intracervically by cooled semen 48-60 h after removal of CIDR together with 5 mcg GnRH administration. Pregnancy rates were 62.5%, 79.2%, 75% and 62.5% in VL, L, S and VS groups, respectively. Abortion rates were 13.3%, 5.3%, 5.6% and 13.3%, also kidding rates were found to be 86.6%, 94.7%, 94.4% and 86.6% in VL, L, S and VS groups, respectively. Fertility rates were 54.2%, 75%, 70.8% and 54.2% in VL, L, S and VS groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in pregnancy rates, abortion and kidding rates among the groups (p>0.05) . As a result, CIDR has a wide range of application period in TAI protocols in Damascus goats during the breeding season. The short-term usage as short as 3 days, will offer high flexibility in TAI protocols of goats. Even no statistical difference was obtained among the groups, lower rates of fertility in VS and VL groups may provide economic loss. Further studies with a larger number of animals are needed to clarify the questions about fertility and economic issues.   

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Doğruer, G., Karaca, F., Ürer, E. K., Coşkun, N., Köse, A. M., Ateş, C. T., Özcan, O., Sarıbay, M. K. (2018). Determination of efficient CIDR application periods in timed artificial insemination of Damascus goats during the breeding season. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 66 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1364251

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Abecia JA, Forcada F, González-Bulnes A (2012): Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci, 130, 173-79.
  2. Ahmed MMM, Makawi SE, Jubara AS (1998): Synchronization of oestrus in Nubian goats. Small Rumin Res, 30, 113-120.
  3. Amridis GS, Cseh S (2012): Assisted reproductive technologies in the reproductive management of small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci, 130, 152-161.
  4. Edmondson MA, Roberts JF, Baird AN, et al. (2012): Theriogenology of sheep and goats. 150-230. In: Pugh DG, Baird AN, (Ed). Sheep and Goat Medicine. 2nd ed. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders.
  5. Engeland IV, Ropstad E, Andresen O, et al. (1997): Pregnancy diagnosis in dairy goats using progesterone assay kits and oestrous observation. Anim Reprod Sci, 47(3), 237-243.
  6. Erarslan C, Karaca F (2017): Üreme Mevsiminde vajinal sünger ve kulak İmplantı uygulamalarıyla senkronize edilen kıl keçilerinde farklı zamanlarda yapılan servikal tohumlamaların gebelik oranlarına etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet Bil Derg, 12(1), 63-70.
  7. Freitas VJF, Baril G, Bosc M, et al. (1996): The influence of ovarian status on response to estrus synchronization treatment in dairy goats during the breeding season. Theriogenology, 45, 1561-1567.
  8. Gordon I (1997): Controlled Reproduction in sheep and goats.University College, Dublin,Ireland.
  9. Greyling JPC, van der Nest M (2000): Synchronization of oestrus in goats: Dose effect of progestagen. Small Rumin Res, 36, 201-207.
  10. Holtz W, Sohnrey B, Gerland M, et al. (2008): Ovsynch synchronization and fixed-time insemination in goats. Theriogenology, 69 (7), 785-792.
  11. Kenfack A, Ngoula F, Yombi-Malonga JP, et al. (2013): Prominent signs of oestrus in the West African Dwarf Goat. IJAS, 3(4), 791-795.
  12. Khanthusaeng V, Navanukraw C, Moonmanee T, et al. (2013): Efficiency comparison of first use and re-use synthetic progesterone on estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates after natural breeding and Timed AI in goats. Chiang Mai Veterinary Journal, 11(1), 31-40.
  13. Knights M, Singh-Knights D (2016): Use of controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) devices to control reproduction in goats: A review. Animal Science Journal, 87, 1084-1089.
  14. Kor NM, Ziaei N, Pour EE (2011): Comparison of reproductive performance in Raieni Goats following different estrous synchronization methods and subsequent eCG treatment during the natural breeding season. Global Veterinaria, 7 (6), 618-624.
  15. Martemucci G, D’Alessandro AG (2011): Induction/synchronization of oestrus and ovulation in dairy goats with different short term treatments and fixed time intrauterine or exocervical insemination system. Anim Reprod Sci, 126, 187-194.
  16. Menchaca A, Rubianes E (2004): New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminant. Reprod Fertil Dev, 16, 403-413.
  17. Menchaca A, Rubianes E (2007): Pregnancy Rate Obtained with Short-term Protocol for Timed Artificial Insemination in Goats. Reprod Dom Anim, 42, 590-593.
  18. Motlomelo KC, Greyling JPC, Schwalbach LMJ (2002): Synchronisation of oestrus in goats: the use of different progestagen treatments. Small Rumin Res, 45, 45-49.
  19. Nogueira DA, Lopes Júnior ES, de Peixoto RM, et al. (2011): Using the Same CIDR up to three times for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in dairy goats. Acta Sci Anim Sci, 33, 321-325.
  20. Omontese BO, Rekwot PI, Ate IU, et al. (2016): An update on oestrus synchronisation of goats in Nigeria. APJR, 5 (2), 96-101.
  21. Romano JR (2004): Synchronization of estrus using CIDR, FGA or MAP intravaginal pessaries during the breeding season in Nubian Goats. Small Rumin Res 55, 15-19.
  22. Rubianes E, Menchaca A (2003): The pattern and manipulation of ovarian follicular growth in goats. Anim Reprod Sci,78, 271-287.
  23. Sarıbay MK, Karaca F, Doğruer G, et al. (2012): Effects of Long and Short Term Progestagen Treatments Plus GnRH Followed by TAI on Fertility Parameters in Lactating Hair Goats during the Transition Period. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 18(3), 507-511.
  24. Simões J (2015): Recent advances on synchronization of ovulation in goats, out of season, for a more sustainable production. APJR, 4(2), 157-165.
  25. Tekin K, Daşkın A (2016): Effect of different extenders on motility and some sperm kinematics parameters in Norduz goat semen. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 40, 490-495.
  26. Vilariño M, Rubianes E, Menchaca A (2011): Re-use of intravaginal progesterone devices associated with the Short-term Protocol for timed artificial insemination in goats. Theriogenology, 75, 1195-1200.
  27. Viñoles C, Forsberg M, Banchero G, et al. (2001): Effect of long-term and short-term progestagen treatment on follicular development and pregnancy rate in cyclic ewes. Theriogenology, 55, 993-1004.
  28. Zamfirescu S, Anghel A, Nadolu D, et al. (2011): Plasmatic profiles of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone levels during early pregnancy in Carpathian Goat, Annals of RSCB, 16, 2,50-53