KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6

COVID-19 Sürecinde Önleyici Davranışlar ile Yaşam Kalitesi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Examining the Relationships between Quality of Life and Preventive Behaviours during COVID-19

Naif Ergün(MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5346-5053
Halis Sakız(MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2406-1011
Sayfa
1679–1697
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırma sonuçları, (a) katılımcıların önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeylerinin cinsiyet gibi bazı demografik değişkenlere göre farklılık gösterdiğini, (b) genel anlamda önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeyinin yüksek olduğunu, (c) yaşam kalitesinin coğrafi bölge, cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik düzeye göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını, (d) yaşam kalitesi düzeyinin önleyici davranışlarla ilişkili olduğunu, ve (e) el yıkama ve sosyal ortamdan uzak durmanın yaşam kalitesini pozitif; evde kalma ve maske/eldiven kullanmanın ise yaşam kalitesini negatif yordadığını ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:COVID-19 pandemisini önlemek amacıyla önleyici tedbirlerin (sosyal mesafe, sokağa çıkmama, elleri yıkamak gibi hijyen kurallarına uyma) insanların yaşam kalitesini olumsuz yönde etkileyebileceği düşünülmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma, Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi 11.04.2020 tarih ve 34233153-050.04.04 sayı kararı ile etik açıdan uygun bulunduktan sonra çalışmanın verileri toplanmaya başlanmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırma sonuçları, (a) katılımcıların önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeylerinin cinsiyet gibi bazı demografik değişkenlere göre farklılık gösterdiğini, (b) genel anlamda önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeyinin yüksek olduğunu, (c) yaşam kalitesinin coğrafi bölge, cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik düzeye göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını, (d) yaşam kalitesi düzeyinin önleyici davranışlarla ilişkili olduğunu, ve (e) el yıkama ve sosyal ortamdan uzak durmanın yaşam kalitesini pozitif; evde kalma ve maske/eldiven kullanmanın ise yaşam kalitesini negatif yordadığını ortaya koymuştur.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020 · 1308 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:COVID-19 · Pandemi · Yaşam kalitesi

Özet

COVID-19 pandemisini önlemek amacıyla önleyici tedbirlerin (sosyal mesafe, sokağa çıkmama, elleri yıkamak gibi hijyen kurallarına uyma) insanların yaşam kalitesini olumsuz yönde etkileyebileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, virüsün bulaşmasını önlemek amacıyla önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeyi ile insanların yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin çeşitli demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi 11.04.2020 tarih ve 34233153-050.04.04 sayı kararı ile etik açıdan uygun bulunduktan sonra çalışmanın verileri toplanmaya başlanmıştır. Araştırma, Türkiye’nin yedi bölgesinden 18-64 yaş aralığında toplam 1308 katılımcıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçları, (a) katılımcıların önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeylerinin cinsiyet gibi bazı demografik değişkenlere göre farklılık gösterdiğini, (b) genel anlamda önleyici davranışlara uyma düzeyinin yüksek olduğunu, (c) yaşam kalitesinin coğrafi bölge, cinsiyet ve sosyoekonomik düzeye göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını, (d) yaşam kalitesi düzeyinin önleyici davranışlarla ilişkili olduğunu, ve (e) el yıkama ve sosyal ortamdan uzak durmanın yaşam kalitesini pozitif; evde kalma ve maske/eldiven kullanmanın ise yaşam kalitesini negatif yordadığını ortaya koymuştur. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar, COVID-19 pandemisi döneminde medikal sonuçlarla birlikte psikolojik, sosyal ve çevresel sonuçların da göz önünde bulundurulması gerektiğini işaret etmektedir.

Abstract

Preventive behaviors (such as keeping social distance, not going out, washing hands) to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic can have negative effects on people's quality of life. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationships among complying with preventive behaviors in order to prevent the spread of the virus and people’s quality of life in terms of various demographic variables. The research was approved by Mardin Artuklu University Ethical Commission (Date: 11.04.2020, Decision no. 34233153-050.04.04). Data were collected from 1308 people with an age range varying between 18-64 years from the seven geographic regions of Turkey. Findings revealed that (a) the levels of exhibiting preventive behaviors differ according to some demographic variables such as gender, (b), the level of exhibiting preventive behaviors is above the medium level, (c) the quality of life differs significantly according to the geographical region, gender and socioeconomic level, (d) the level of quality of life is related to preventive behaviors and differs according to demographic variables, and (e) preventive behaviors of hand washing and staying away from social environment predicts quality of life positively, while the preventive behaviors of staying at home and using masks/gloves predicts the quality of life negatively. The results indicate that the psychological, social and environmental consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic should be taken into account along with the medical consequences.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ergün, N., Sakız, H. (2021). COVID-19 Sürecinde Önleyici Davranışlar ile Yaşam Kalitesi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6, 1679–1697. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.974981

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (61)

  1. Albayrak, A. S., Kalaycı, Ş., & Karataş, A. (2004). Türkiye'de coğrafi bölgelere göre illerin sosyoekonomik gelişmişlik düzeylerinin temel bileşenler analiziyle incelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2),101-130.
  2. American, S. (2020, Nisan 25). WHO declares coronavirus outbreak a global health emergency. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/who-declares-coronavirus-outbreak-a- global-health-emergency/
  3. Anderson, R. M., Hesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country basd mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5
  4. Anssea, M., Dierick, M., Buntinkx, F., Cnockaert, P., De Smedt, J., Van Den Haute, M., & Vander Mijnsbrugge, D. (2004). High prevalence of mental disorders in primary care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 78, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00219-7
  5. Batawi, S., Tarazan, N., Al-Raddadi, R., Al Qasim, E., Sindi, A.,, Al Johni, S., …& Alraddadi, B.M. (2019). Quality of life reported by survivors after hospitalization for Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(101), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1165-2
  6. Bisegger, C., Cloetta, B., Von Bisegger, U., Abel, T., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2005). Health-related quality of life: gender differences in childhood and adolescence. Sozial-und Präventivmedizin, 50(5), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-005-4094-2
  7. Bish, A. & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797-824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826
  8. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 9112-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
  9. Bowling, A. (2005). Ageing well: Quality of life in old age. London: Open University Press.
  10. Bozdağ, F. (2021). The psychological effects of staying home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of General Psychology, 148(3), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1867494
  11. Bozdağ, F. (2020). Pandemi sürecinde psikolojik sağlamlık. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 247-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44890
  12. Chavanon, M. L., Inkrot, S., Zelenak, C., Tahirovic, E., Stanojevic, D., Apostolovic, S.,. & Veskovic, J. (2017). Regional differences in health-related quality of life in elderly heart failure patients: results from the CIBIS-ELD trial. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 106(8), 645-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1101-6
  13. Chen J., Wu J., Hao S., Yang M., Lu X., Chen X., & Li L. (2017). Long term outcomes in survivors of epidemic influenza a (H7N9) virus infection. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17497-6
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Assossiates Publishers.
  15. Dogramaci, A. C., Yurtman Havlucu, D., Inandi, T., & Balkrishnan, R. (2009). Validation of a melasma quality of life questionnaire for the Turkish language: The MelasQoL-TR study. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 20(2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546630802287553
  16. Dorfan, N. M. & Woody, S. R. (2011). Danger appraisals as prospective predictors of disgust and avoidance of contaminants. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.2.105
  17. Eagly, A.H. & Wood, W. (2016). Social Role Theory of Sex Differences. In A. Wong, M. Wickramasinghe, R. Hoogland, and N. A. Naples (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies.
  18. Eser, E., Fidaner, H., Fidaner, C., Eser, S. Y., Elbi H., & Göker E. (1999). Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF. Journal of Psychiatry Psychology Psychopharmacology, 7, 23–40.
  19. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London: Sage.
  20. Genç, A., Şener, Ü., Karabacak, H., & Üçok, K. (2011). Kadın ve erkek genç erişkinler arasında fiziksel aktivite ve yaşam kalitesi farklılıklarının araştırılması. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 12, 145-150.
  21. Ghaedi, G. H., Tavoli, A., Bakhtiari, M., Melyani, M., & Sahragard, M. (2010). Quality of life in college students with and without social phobia. Social Indicators Research, 97, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9500-3
  22. Greenberg, N., Docherty, M., Gnanapragasam, S., & Wessely, S. (2020). Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ, 368, M1211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1211
  23. Hale, T., Hetherick, A., Phillips, T., & Webster, S. (2020). Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Blavatnik school of government working paper, 31. https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/sites/default/files/learning/document/2020/4/BSG-WP-2020-031-v3.0.pdf
  24. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
  25. Hawthorne, G. (2006). Measuring social isolation in older adults: development and initial validation of the friendship scale. Social Indicators Research, 77(3), 521-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y
  26. Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L.,. & Ford, T. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
  27. Hui, D.S., Ko, F.W., Chan, D.P., Fok, J.P., Chan, M.C., To, K.W., & Sung, J.J. (2005). The long-term impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in a cohort of survivors. Chest, 128. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4_MeetingAbstracts.148S-b
  28. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mc Graw Hill.
  29. Ibuka, Y., Chapman, G. B., Meyers, L. A., Li, M., & Galvani, A. P. (2010). The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10(1), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-296
  30. Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52-54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.245
  31. Kupferschmidt, K. & Cohen, J. (2020, Mart 22). China’s aggressive measures have slowed the coronavirus. They may not work in other countiries. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/china-s-aggressive-measures-have-slowed-coronavirus-they-may-not-work-other-countries
  32. Lau, J. T., Griffiths, S., Choi, K. C., & Lin, C. (2010). Prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during early phase of the H1N1 influenza epidemic. American Journal of Infection Control, 38(5), 374-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.002
  33. Lukšík, I. & Hargašová, L. (2018). Impact of residential care culture on quality of life of care leavers. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818214
  34. Mendlowicz, M. V. & Stein, M. B. (2000). Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.669
  35. Musich, S., Wang, S. S., Hawkins, K., & Yeh, C. S. (2015). The Impact of Loneliness on Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction Among Older, Sicker Adults. Gerontology & geriatric medicine, 1, 2333721415582119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721415582119
  36. Pellowski, J. A., Kalichman, S. C., Matthews, K. A., & Adler, N. (2013). A pandemic of the poor: social disadvantage and the US HIV epidemic. American Psychologist, 68(4), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032694
  37. Rothan, H. A., & Byrareddy, S. N. (2020). The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Journal of autoimmunity, 109, 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
  38. Sadique, M. Z., Edmunds, W. J., Smith, R. D., Meerding, W. J., De Zwart, O., Brug, J., & Beutels, P. (2007). Precautionary behavior in response to perceived threat of pandemic influenza. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 13(9), 1307-1313. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1309.070372
  39. Sakız, H. (2011). Perceptions of quality of life in children with learning disabilities (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Turkey. (Tez No: 298333)
  40. Satici, B., Gocet-Tekin, E., Deniz, M. E., & Satici, S. A. (2020). Adaptation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Its Association with Psychological Distress and Life Satisfaction in Turkey. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1–9. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00294-0
  41. Schalock, R.L. & Verdugo, M.A. (2002). Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington DC.
  42. Schwartzman, C. M., Boisseau, C. L., Sibrava, N. J., Mancebo, M. C., Eisen, J. L., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2017). Symptom subtype and quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 249, 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.025
  43. Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Patricia Chou, S., Smith, S., Goldstein, R. B., June Ruan, W., & Grant, B. F. (2007). The epidemiology of DSM-IV specific phobia in the USA: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological medicine, 37(7), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707000086
  44. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (sixth ed.). Boston, Pearson.
  45. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İçişleri Bakanlığı (2020, Mayıs 29). 81 il valiliğine 18 yaş altı ile 65 yaş ve üzeri kişilerin sokağa çıkma kısıtlaması genelgesi. https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/81-il-valiligine-18-yas-alti-ile-65-yas-ve-uzeri-kisilerin-sokaga-cikma-kisitlamasi-genelgesi
  46. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı (2020, Temmuz 16). Türkiye günlük koronavirüs tablosu. https://COVID19.saglik.gov.tr/
  47. Twardzik, E., Clarke, P., Elliott, M. R., Haley, W. E., Judd, S., & Colabianchi, N. (2019). Neighborhood socioeconomic status and trajectories of physical health-related quality of life among stroke survivors. Stroke, 50(11), 3191-3197. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025874
  48. von Rueden, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bisegger, C., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2006). Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European study. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 60(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.039792
  49. Vrbova, K., Prasko, J., Ociskova, M., & Holubova, M. (2017). Comorbidity of schizophrenia and social phobia–impact on quality of life, hope, and personality traits: a cross sectional study. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 2073. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S141749
  50. Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
  51. Williams, K. B., Gadbury-Amyot, C. C., Bray, K. K., Manne, D., & Collins, P. (1998). Oral health-related quality of life: A model for dental hygiene. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 72(2), 19-26.
  52. World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment: Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.
  53. World Health Organization (2021, Temmuz 12). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
  54. World Health Organization (2020a, Haziran 12). Rational use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for coronavirus disease. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331498/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPCPPE_use-2020.2-eng.pdf.
  55. World Health Organization (2020b, Haziran 12). Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the- second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee- regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)
  56. World Health Organization (2020c, Temmuz 16). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for infection prevention precautions: Scientific brief. https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions.
  57. World Health Organization (2020d, Temmuz 16). Statement – Older people are at highest risk from COVID-19, but all must act to prevent community spread. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-COVID-19/statements/statement-older-people-are-at-highest-risk-from-COVID-19,-but-all-must-act-to-prevent-community-spread.
  58. Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. R. (2018). Who is afraid of the Ebola outbreak? The influence of discrete emotions on risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 21(7), 834-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1247378
  59. Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. F. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2381-2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072381
  60. Chavanon, M. L., Inkrot, S., Zelenak, C., Tahirovic, E., Stanojevic, D., Apostolovic, S.,. & Veskovic, J. (2017). Regional differences in health-related quality of life in elderly heart failure patients: results from the CIBIS-ELD trial. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 106(8), 645-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1101-6
  61. Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L.,. & Ford, T. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1