KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Infologica / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Tracking Digital Maturity in Museums: A Case Study of the Most Visited Museums in Ankara

Başak Gök(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8687-5961
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, cultural institutions must restructure their digital transformation policies to be more inclusive, strategic, and participatory

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the fundamental components of tourism is museums, which are strategic venues for preserving and transmitting cultural heritage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study uses a case study of the nine most visited museums in Ankara in 2024.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, cultural institutions must restructure their digital transformation policies to be more inclusive, strategic, and participatory
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Digital Transformation · Digital Maturity · Digitalization in Museums

Abstract

One of the fundamental components of tourism is museums, which are strategic venues for preserving and transmitting cultural heritage. Digital transformation in museums affects exhibition and management processes and enhances the visitor experience, providing destinations with a competitive advantage. This study uses a case study of the nine most visited museums in Ankara in 2024. It assesses digital maturity levels in three dimensions: (1) digital presence and access, (2) digital experience of visitors, and (3) governance, human resources, and digital infrastructure. Data were collected through interviews and digital document analysis and evaluated using qualitative comparative analysis. Digital maturity in museums is moderate. Governance, human resources, and infrastructure were determined to be the strongest dimensions, while digital experience was the weakest. The results show that although museums have reached a certain level of maturity in terms of technical infrastructure, this infrastructure is not sufficiently reflected in visitor-focused digital experiences, and there are significant differences in the level of digitalization across museums. The research results indicate that infrastructure investments alone are insufficient for the success of digital transformation. This demonstrates that elements such as governance, human resource quality, and digital content production must be integrated into the process and implemented with a sociotechnical approach. Therefore, cultural institutions must restructure their digital transformation policies to be more inclusive, strategic, and participatory

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gök, B. (2026). Tracking Digital Maturity in Museums: A Case Study of the Most Visited Museums in Ankara. Acta Infologica, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1796952

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (58)

  1. Acuner, E., & Şimşek, M. (2024). Müzelerde dijital dönüşüm: Müze çalışanlarının dijital dönüşüm algılarının ve yetkinliklerinin incelenmesi [Digital transformation in museums: Investigating the digital transformation perceptions and competencies of museum employees]. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 14(2),103-123. doi: 10.14230/johut1661 google scholar
  2. Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y. (2022). Digital transformation toward artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented public administration: Government employees’ perception and willingness to use AI in government Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664 google scholar
  3. Awang, N., Yaakub, A. R.,& Othman, Z. (2009). Assessing user acceptance toward virtual museums: The case of the Kedah State Museum, Malaysia In 2009 Sixth International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization (pp. 158–163). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CGIV.2009.67 google scholar
  4. Azjen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T google scholar
  5. Bostrom, R. P.,& Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures:A socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/248710 google scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  7. Chen, J. and Lehto, X. (2025). Exploring tourists’ schemas and information needs in driving tourism: A naturalistic inquiry to inform audio guide content Tourism and hospitality research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584251346023 google scholar
  8. Chen, J., Wu, J., Wang, D., & Stantic, B. (2024). Beyond static rankings: A tourist experience-driven approach to measure destination competitiveness, Tourism Management, 106, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105022https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105022 google scholar
  9. Cronje, D.F,. Du Plessis, E. (2020). A review on tourism destination competitiveness, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.012 google scholar
  10. Cucculelli, M.,& Goffi,G. (2016). Does sustainability enhance the competitiveness of tourism destinations? Evidence from Italian Destinations of Excellence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.069 google scholar
  11. Çizel, R., Aşkun, V.,& Çizel, B. (2022). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında bulanık kwame intel karşılaştırmalı analyze yönteminin kullanımı [Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis in social science research]. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 42(2), 549-588. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0040https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0040 google scholar
  12. Digitalization and Intellectual Property Rights. (2025, July 09). Final report digitization and IPR in European museums. Retrieved from https://www.ne-mo.org/fileadmin/Dateien/public/Publications/NEMO_Final_Report_Digitisation_and_IPR_in_European_Museums_WG_07.2020.pdf google scholar
  13. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social Inequality (pp. 355–400). Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610444200.14 google scholar
  14. DiMaggio, P.,& Hargittai, E. (2023). From the digital divide to digital inequality: Studying internet use as penetration increases Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rhqmu google scholar
  15. Eck, T., An, S., & Jiang, L. (2024). Role of heritage interpretation and mindfulness in dark tourism experiences Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241292013https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241292013 google scholar
  16. Fernandez-Lores, S., Crespo-Tejero, N., & Fernandez-Hernandez, R. (2022). Driving traffic to museums: The role of digital communication tools Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121273. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121273 google scholar
  17. Gomes, J., & Romao, M. (2025). Evaluating maturity models in healthcare information systems: A comprehensive review Healthcare, 13, 1847. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151847 google scholar
  18. Giannini, T., & Bowen, J. P. (2022). Museums and Digital Culture: From Reality to Digitality in the Age of COVID-19 Heritage, 5(1), 192–214. http://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5010011 google scholar
  19. Gökçe Parsehyan, B. (2020). Digital transformation in museum management: Information and communication technology usage Turkish Studies - Social, 15(8), 3539-3550. https://dx.doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.45995 google scholar
  20. Guo, K., Fan, A., Lehto, X. & Day, J. (2021). Immersive digital tourism: Multisensory cues’ role in digital museum experiences Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(6), 1017-1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211030319https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211030319 google scholar
  21. Guo, Q., Zhu, D., Li, F., Wang, X.,& Shu, Y. (2024). Tourists’ adoption of extended reality technologies: A meta-analytical structural equation modeling. Journal of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 69–79. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(3), 450–463, https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221108906 google scholar
  22. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and visual culture interpretation Routledge. google scholar
  23. Hutchinson, R. S., & Eardley, A. F. (2020). The accessible museum: Toward an understanding of international audio description practices in museums. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 114(6), 475-487, https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X20971958https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X20971958 google scholar
  24. ICOM. (May 11, 2025). Museum definition. Retrieved from http://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/museum-definition/ google scholar
  25. İmren, E., Anbaroğlu, B., & Yalçıner Ercoşkun, Ö. (2021). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecindeki çevrimiçi market alışveriş tercihleri ile perakende marketlerin erişilebilirliği arasındaki ilişkiler: Çankaya ilçesi örneği [Relationships between online market shopping preferences and the accessibility of retail markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of the district of Çankaya]. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 1–24. doi: 10.5505/jas.2023.25743 google scholar
  26. Karakuş Yılmaz, T., Yılmaz, Z.,& Arpacık, O. (2025). Gamified mobile guidance for museum virtual tours: How task design shapes learning experience and cognitive load Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(6), 1430–1459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251347008 google scholar
  27. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of the American Medical Association. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. http://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106 google scholar
  28. Let us Get Real. (2025, July 27, 2025. https://www.culture24.org.uk/lets-get-real/ google scholar
  29. Ministry of Tourism and Culture Data (July 5, 2025). Ankara Kültür ve Turizm Verileri 2024. https://ankara.ktb.gov.tr/Eklenti/132724,2024-kultur-ve-turizm-verileripdf.pdf?0 google scholar
  30. MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting. (2012). The digital advantage: How do digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry? Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://ide.mit.edu/sites/default/files/The_Digital_Advantage__How_Digital_Leaders_Outperform_their_Peers_in_Every_Industry.pdf google scholar
  31. Mumford, E. (2000). Socio-technical approach to system design Requirements Engineering, 5(2), 125–133. doi: 10.1007/PL00010345 google scholar
  32. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations Organization Science 3(3), 301-441. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 google scholar
  33. Parry, R. 2007. Museum Recoding: Digital Heritage and the Technologies of Change Routledge. google scholar
  34. Parry, R., & Dziekan, V. (2021). Critical Digital: Museums and their Postdigital Circumstance In H. Barranha, & J. Henriques, S. (Eds.), Art, Museums & Digital Cultures: Rethinking Change (pp. 16-26). Universidade Nova de Lisboa google scholar
  35. Pine, J. and Gilmore, J. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review. google scholar
  36. Pop, I. L., & Borza, A. (2016). Factors influencing museum sustainability and indicators for museum sustainability measurement. Sustainability, 8(1), 101. doi: 10.3390/su8010101 google scholar
  37. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnx57 google scholar
  38. Raimo, N., De Turi, I., Ricciardelli, A., & Vitolla, F. (2022). Digitalization in the Cultural Industry: Evidence from Italian Museums International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(8), 1962–1974. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0082 google scholar
  39. Rejon-Guardia, F., García-Sastre, M. A., Orfila-Sintes, F., & Garau-Vadell, J. B. (2020). Virtual reality in Centennial Tourism Acceptance Tourism Analysis, 2(3), 335–344. doi: 10.3727/108354220X15758301241837 google scholar
  40. Ritchie, J.R.B. & Crouch, G. I. (2010). A model of destination competitiveness/sustainability: Brazilian perspectives, Revista de Administração Pública 44(5), 1049-1066. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122010000500003https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122010000500003 google scholar
  41. Segui-Amortegui, L., Clemente-Almendros, J. A., Medina, R., & Grueso Gala, M. (2019). Sustainability and competitiveness in the tourism industry and tourist destinations: A Bibliometric Study Sustainability, 11(22), 6351. doi: 10.3390/su11226351 google scholar
  42. Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R. C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 4.0 – Potential for creating smart products: Empirical research results In W. Abramowicz (Ed.), Business information systems: BIS 2015 (Lecture notes in business information processing, Vol. 208, pp. 16–27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2 google scholar
  43. Schneider, P., & Sting, F. J. (2020). Employees’ Perspectives on Digitalization-Induced Change: Exploring Industry 4.0 Frames Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(3), 406–435. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2019.0012 google scholar
  44. Schumacher, A., Erol, S. and Sihn, W. (2016). A Maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises, Procedia CIRP, 52, 161-166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 google scholar
  45. Shin, H. H., & Jeong, M. (2021). Travelers’ motivations to adopt augmented reality (AR) applications in a tourism destination. Journal of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 12(2), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2018-0082 google scholar
  46. Segui-Amortegui, L., Clemente-Almendros, J. A., Medina, R.,& Gala, M. G. (2019). Sustainability and competitiveness in the tourism industry and tourist destinations: A bibliometric study. Journal of Tourism Management, 63, 69–79. Sustainability, 11(22), 6351. doi: 10.3390/su11226351 google scholar
  47. Şener, U., Gökalp, E., & Eren, P. E. (2021). Dijital olgunluk innesi: Organizasyonların digital dönüşüm yolculuğunda verimliliği artırmak için air kantitatif yöntem [Digital maturity index: A quantitative method to increase efficiency in organizations’ digital transformation journey]. Verimlilik Dergisi, 1, 45–60. http://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1002353 google scholar
  48. The Digital Advantage. (2025, July 27) The Digital Advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. https://ide.mit.edu/sites/default/files/The_Digital_Advantage__How_Digital_Leaders_Outperform_their_Peers_in_Every_Industry.pdf google scholar
  49. UNESCO. (2025, May 11) Home. http://www.unesco.org/en/museums google scholar
  50. Trist, E. (1981). Evolution of sociotechnical systems Ontario Quality of Working Life Center. google scholar Uslu, A. and Tosun, P. (2024). Examining the impact of the fear of missing out on museum visit intentions, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(6), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348023116860https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348023116860 google scholar
  51. Vargas, L. (2019). Understanding museum digital maturity through data collection and use (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester). University of Leicester. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.11108672.v1 google scholar
  52. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 google scholar
  53. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540 google scholar
  54. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q.,& Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 google scholar
  55. Vey, M.A., Fandel-Meyer, T., Zipp, J.S., Schneider, C., 2017. Learning and development in times of digital transformation: Facilitating a change and innovation culture. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 10(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v10i1.6334 google scholar
  56. Wang, S., Duan, Y., Yang, X., Cao, C.,& Pan, S. (2023). Smart museum’ in China: From technology labs to sustainable knowledgescapes, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(3), 1340–1358, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac097 google scholar
  57. Yüce, A., Araslı, H., Öztüren, A.,& Daskın, M. (2020). Feeling closer to the service product: Triggering visit intention via VR. Sustainability, 12(16), 6632. doi: 10.3390/su12166632 google scholar
  58. Zhang, H., Cheng, Z., Chen, X.,& Chen, X. (2022). How does destination social responsibility affect citizenship behavior at cultural heritage sites? Mediating roles of destination reputation and destination ıdentification. Sustainability, 14(11), 6772. doi: 10.3390/su14116772 google scholar