KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Tracing the Benefits of Self Annotation in Genre-based Writing

Demet Yaylı
Sayfa
45–58
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is suggested that training learners to articulate their intentions in annotations should be prioritized so that self annotation might work properly as a tool for awareness-raising and learner autonomy

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Self-annotation writing is an important tool as it plays the dual roles of encouraging the students to act as reviewers of their own texts and of providing their instructor with a means of better understanding their descriptions and explanations for the design of their texts.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, although annotation writing has appeared in the literature as a pedagogical tool, the studies systematically examining learners’ self annotation writing practices are scant.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is suggested that training learners to articulate their intentions in annotations should be prioritized so that self annotation might work properly as a tool for awareness-raising and learner autonomy
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Self annotation · genre-based writing · self assessment

Abstract

Self-annotation writing is an important tool as it plays the dual roles of encouraging the students to act as reviewers of their own texts and of providing their instructor with a means of better understanding their descriptions and explanations for the design of their texts. However, although annotation writing has appeared in the literature as a pedagogical tool, the studies systematically examining learners’ self annotation writing practices are scant. This study, therefore, aims to gain insights into the benefits of self-annotation writing embedded in genre-based writing activities of a group of EFL learners. The participants’ literacy narratives, self annotation excerpts and their post-instruction views on self-annotation writing were qualitatively analyzed. The findings indicated several benefits of annotation writing, corroborating some previous studies. It is suggested that training learners to articulate their intentions in annotations should be prioritized so that self annotation might work properly as a tool for awareness-raising and learner autonomy

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yaylı, D. (2016). Tracing the Benefits of Self Annotation in Genre-based Writing. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 45–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/134581

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Beck, J.P. (1982). Asking students to annotate their own papers. College Composition and Communication, 33(3), 322-326.
  2. Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 165- 186. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (21-40). Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Brown, A. (2005). Self-assessment of writing in independent language learning programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessing Writing, 10, 174-191.
  3. Canagarajah, A.S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  4. Charles, M. (1990). Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique. ELT Journal, 44(4), 286-293.
  5. Cheng, A. (2006). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 76-89.
  6. Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 287-307.
  7. Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Cram, B. (1995). Self-assessment: From theory to practice. In: G. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action: Developing a workshop guide for teachers (pp. 271–305). NCELTR: Sydney, NSW. Cresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: Developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54(3), 235-244.
  9. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Ferris, D.R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher responses in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
  11. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  12. Halliday, M. A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2003). Writing teachers as assessors of writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 162-241). Cambridge: Cambridge Universi