KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Resilience / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Afet Sonrası Geçici Konutların Sürdürülebilirlik Risk Faktörlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve

Assessing the Sustainability Risk Factors of Post-Disaster Temporary Housing: A Conceptual Framework

Merve Serter(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9838-7239
Gülden Gümüşburun Ayalp(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, MİMARLIK BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-7989-5569
Sayfa
327–339
Yayın Tarihi
2026-02-08
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hesaplanan sayısal yoğunluk, bu risklerin literatürdeki önemini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Doğal veya insan kaynaklı afetler, etkili geçici barınma çözümlerine olan acil ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu bağlamda, 2016 ile 2025 yılları arasında Web of Science veritabanında anahtar kelime araması yapılarak bulunan 23 makale tematik analiz kullanılarak incelenmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hesaplanan sayısal yoğunluk, bu risklerin literatürdeki önemini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Afet Sonrası · Geçici Barınma · Sürdürülebilirlik

Özet

Doğal veya insan kaynaklı afetler, etkili geçici barınma çözümlerine olan acil ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır. Afet sonrası geçici barınma, hızlı müdahale ve barınak sağlamak için çok önemlidir, ancak sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleriyle ilgili çeşitli riskler de barındırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, geçici barınma uygulamalarının sürdürülebilirlik riskleri kapsamlı bir literatür taraması yoluyla belirlenmiş ve tematik olarak düzenlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, 2016 ile 2025 yılları arasında Web of Science veritabanında anahtar kelime araması yapılarak bulunan 23 makale tematik analiz kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Literatür taraması sürecinde, her bir risk teması, ona atıfta bulunan yayınların sayısına göre sıklıklarına göre kategorize edilmiştir. Hesaplanan sayısal yoğunluk, bu risklerin literatürdeki önemini göstermektedir. Bulgularla tutarlı olarak, riskler dört ana tema altında gruplandırılmıştır: (i) çevresel, (ii) ekonomik, (iii) sosyal ve (iv) örgütsel. Çalışma, afet sonrası geçici barınma stratejilerinin sürdürülebilirlik perspektifinden yeniden değerlendirilmesine yardımcı olmayı ve tasarım stratejisi süreçlerinin geliştirilmesi için veriye dayalı bir temel sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

Abstract

Disasters, whether natural or man-made, underscore the urgent demand for effective temporary housing solutions. Post-disaster temporary housing is crucial for providing quick response and shelter, but it also presents several risks related to sustainability principles. In this study, the sustainability risks of temporary housing practices are identified through a comprehensive literature review and organized thematically. In this context, 23 papers found through a keyword search in the Web of Science database between 2016 and 2025 were analyzed using thematic analysis. During the literature review process, each risk theme was categorized by frequency based on the number of publications that referenced it. The numerical density calculated shows the prominence of these risks in the literature. Consistent with the findings, the risks were grouped into four main themes: (i) environmental, (ii) economic, (iii) social, and (iv) organizational. The study aims to assist in reevaluating post-disaster temporary housing strategies from a sustainability perspective and to provide a data-driven foundation for developing design strategy processes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Serter, M., Ayalp, G. G. (2026). Afet Sonrası Geçici Konutların Sürdürülebilirlik Risk Faktörlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Resilience, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.32569/resilience.1831630

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (30)

  1. Afkhamiaghda, M., Elwakil, E., & Afsari, K. (2021). Creating a Performance Indicator for Temporary Housing Creating a Performance Indicator for Temporary Housing Authors: Corresponding Author: Creating a Performance Indicator for Temporary Housing. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 48(9), 1093–1104. https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjce-pubshttps://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjce-pubs
  2. Atmaca, A., & Atmaca, N. (2016). Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings. Applied Energy, 171, 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.058
  3. Atmaca, N. (2017). Life-cycle assessment of post-disaster temporary housing. Building Research and Information, 45(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1127116 Avlar, E., Limoncu, S., & Tızman, D. (2023). Post-earthquake temporary housing unit: CLT E-BOX. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 38(1), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1027894
  4. Biswas, A. (2019). Exploring Indian post-disaster temporary housing strategy through a comparative review. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-09-2018-0037
  5. Biswas, A., & Puriya, A. (2020). Comparative Assessment of Indian Post-Disaster Temporary Housing Strategies. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000386
  6. Bologna, R. (2020). Operational dimension of post-disaster housing temporality and technical control tools. TECHNE, 20, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-8232
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Bris, P., & Bendito, F. (2019). Impact of Japanese post-disaster temporary housing areas’ (THAs) design on mental and social health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234757
  9. Félix, D., Branco, J. M., & Feio, A. (2013). Temporary housing after disasters: A state of the art survey. Habitat International, 40, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.03.006
  10. Hosseini, S. M. A., De La Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016). Multi-criteria decision-making method for assessing the sustainability of post-disaster temporary housing units technologies: A case study in Bam, 2003. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.012
  11. Hosseini, S. M. A., de la Fuente, A., & Pons, O. (2016). Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for Sustainable Site Location of Post-Disaster Temporary Housing in Urban Areas. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001137
  12. Hosseini, S. M. A., Farahzadi, L., & Pons, O. (2021). Assessing the sustainability index of different post-disaster temporary housing unit configuration types. Journal of Building Engineering, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102806
  13. Hosseini, S. M. A., Ghalambordezfooly, R., & de la Fuente, A. (2022). Sustainability Model to Select Optimal Site Location for Temporary Housing Units: Combining GIS and the MIVES–Knapsack Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084453
  14. Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2020). A sustainability-based model for dealing with the uncertainties of post-disaster temporary housing. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 5(5), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1583487
  15. Hosseini, S. M. A., Yazdani, R., & Fuente, A. de la. (2020). Multi-objective interior design optimization method based on sustainability concepts for post-disaster temporary housing units. Building and Environment, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106742
  16. Montalbano, G., & Santi, G. (2023). Sustainability of Temporary Housing in Post-Disaster Scenarios: A Requirement-Based Design Strategy. Buildings, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13122952
  17. Oggioni, C., Chelleri, L., & Forino, G. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities for Pre-disaster Strategic Planning in Post-disaster Temporary Housing Provision. Evidence from Earthquakes in Central Italy (2016-2017). IJPP-Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 9(1), 96–129.
  18. Perrucci, D., & Baroud, H. (2020). A review of temporary housing management modeling: Trends in design strategies, optimization models, and decision-making methods. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410388
  19. Perrucci, D. V., & Baroud, H. (2021). Temporary housing operations: A simulation-based inventory management approach using the newsvendor model. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102512
  20. Perrucci, D. V., Wilson, J., Brown, R., Mireles Camey, J., Doktycz, C., Perry, M., & Buitrago, G. C. (2025). Using the critical path method (CPM) for evaluating allocation potential of temporary housing units. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-025-10196-z
  21. Pomponi, F., Moghayedi, A., Alshawawreh, L., D’Amico, B., & Windapo, A. (2019). Sustainability of post-disaster and post-conflict sheltering in Africa: What matters? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.06.007
  22. Reza Mojahedi, M., Vafamehr, M., & Ekhlassi, A. (2021). Designing post-disaster temporary housing inspired by the housing of indigenous nomads of Iran. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(2), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctaa061
  23. Shi, J., Duan, K., Wu, G., Zhang, R., & Feng, X. (2020). Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public–private partnerships (PPPs) research field: a new bibliometric journey. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2145–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03607-1
  24. Shrestha, S. R., & Orchiston, C. H. R. (2023). Context, culture, and cordons: The feasibility of post-earthquake cordons learned through a case study in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Earthquake Spectra, 39(4), 2152–2172. https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231191740
  25. Song, Y., Mithraratne, N., & Zhang, H. (2016). Life-time performance of post-disaster temporary housing: A case study in Nanjing. Energy and Buildings, 128, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.019
  26. Sukhwani, V., Napitupulu, H., Jingnan, D., Yamaji, M., & Shaw, R. (2021). Enhancing cultural adequacy in post-disaster temporary housing. Progress in Disaster Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100186
  27. Tsai, S. L., Ochiai, C., Deng, C. Z., & Tseng, M. H. (2022). A sustainable post-disaster housing development framework for an indigenous Hao-Cha community in Taiwan: considering culture and livelihood in housing extensions. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2021-0019
  28. Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
  29. Wang, C., Costa, R., & Baker, J. (2022). Simulating Post-disaster Temporary Housing Needs for Displaced Households and Out-of-town Contractors. Earthquake Spectra, 38(4), 2922–2940. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1374097/v1
  30. Watanabe, H., & Maruyama, T. (2021). Residential preference transitions of disaster victims: A case using three-wave panel data in Mashiki following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102062