KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yeni Medya / 2022 / Cilt: 2022 Sayı: 12

Tiktok ve Gazetecilik İlişkisi Üzerine Ülkeler Arası Karşılaştırmalı İçerik Analizi

A Cross-Country Comparative Content Analysis on the Connection of Tiktok and Journalism

Sedat Erol(BEYKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4650-213X
Sayfa
302–325
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca gazetecilerin, kalıplaşmış gazeteci kimliğinin sınırları dışında sosyal medyada yaygınlaşan “fenomen” davranışlarını sergilemesi ve Tiktok’ta yer alan filtreler, efektler ve metin bileşenlerinde yapılabilen değişikliklerin fiziki gerçeklik ile sunulan görüntüler arasındaki ilişkinin uzaklaşmasına yol açması çalışmanın önemli çıktıları arasında yer almıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sosyal medya platformlarının sunduğu paylaşım formatları ve genç nesillerin haber tüketim pratikleri göz önünde bulundurularak milyonlarca kişi tarafından kullanılan Tiktok platformunu; gazetecilik kültürü, haber üretimi, haber tüketimi ve gazeteciliğin geleceği çerçevesinde tahlil etmenin önemli olacağı düşünülmüştür.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Farklı ülkelerin yaygın gazetelerinin Tiktok paylaşımlarındaki ortak ve ayrışan noktalar nelerdir?
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca gazetecilerin, kalıplaşmış gazeteci kimliğinin sınırları dışında sosyal medyada yaygınlaşan “fenomen” davranışlarını sergilemesi ve Tiktok’ta yer alan filtreler, efektler ve metin bileşenlerinde yapılabilen değişikliklerin fiziki gerçeklik ile sunulan görüntüler arasındaki ilişkinin uzaklaşmasına yol açması çalışmanın önemli çıktıları arasında yer almıştır.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Tiktok · Sosyal Medya · Yeni Medya

Özet

Sosyal medya platformlarının sunduğu paylaşım formatları ve genç nesillerin haber tüketim pratikleri göz önünde bulundurularak milyonlarca kişi tarafından kullanılan Tiktok platformunu; gazetecilik kültürü, haber üretimi, haber tüketimi ve gazeteciliğin geleceği çerçevesinde tahlil etmenin önemli olacağı düşünülmüştür. Tiktok’ta yapılan paylaşımları diğer sosyal medya platformlarından ayıran özelliklerinden birisi içerik temalarının genelinde eğlence unsurlarının bulunmasıdır. Bu bilgilere dayanarak oluşturulan iki temel araştırma sorusu şöyledir: Tiktok’un demografik yapısı ve platformun yapısal imkânları, haber üretim süreçlerini belirlemekte midir? Farklı ülkelerin yaygın gazetelerinin Tiktok paylaşımlarındaki ortak ve ayrışan noktalar nelerdir? Araştırmada yöntem olarak içerik analizi tercih edilmiş ve The Washington Post, Daily Mail ve Hürriyet’in Tiktok paylaşımları incelenmiştir. 2021 yılı başından başlamak üzere her üç gazeteden yapılan 50 Tiktok paylaşımı, toplamda 150 paylaşım platforma hâkim tasarım, tür, içerik düzenleme olanakları, dil ve etkileşim bağlamında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda gazetelerin, Tiktok paylaşımlarında genellikle renkli haberleri tercih ettiği, ciddi haberler ele alındığında ise platformun yapısına uygun olarak eğlenceli, nüktedan, komedi unsurları barındıran bir dile başvurduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca gazetecilerin, kalıplaşmış gazeteci kimliğinin sınırları dışında sosyal medyada yaygınlaşan “fenomen” davranışlarını sergilemesi ve Tiktok’ta yer alan filtreler, efektler ve metin bileşenlerinde yapılabilen değişikliklerin fiziki gerçeklik ile sunulan görüntüler arasındaki ilişkinin uzaklaşmasına yol açması çalışmanın önemli çıktıları arasında yer almıştır.

Abstract

Considering the sharing formats offered by social media platforms, Tiktok; It was thought that it would be important to analyze within the framework of journalism culture, news production, news consumption and the future of journalism. One of the features of the shares made on Tiktok is the presence of entertainment elements throughout the content themes. The two main research questions created on the basis of this information are as follows: Do the demographic structure of Tiktok and the structural possibilities of the platform determine the news production processes? What are the common and divergent points in the Tiktok posts of popular newspapers from different countries? Content analysis was preferred as a method in this study. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the newspapers generally prefer soft news in their Tiktok posts, and when hard news is considered, they use a language that is funny, prank and contains comedy elements in accordance with the structure of the platform. In addition, journalists exhibiting 'phenomenon' behaviors that have become widespread in social media and the changes that can be made in the video components in Tiktok are among the important outputs of the study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erol, S. (2022). Tiktok ve Gazetecilik İlişkisi Üzerine Ülkeler Arası Karşılaştırmalı İçerik Analizi. Yeni Medya, Cilt: 2022 Sayı: 12, 302–325. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1089436

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. Ariel, Y. & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, interactivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972404
  2. Bandy, J. & Diakopoulos, N. (2020, September). #TulsaFlop: A case study of algorithmically-influenced collective action on TikTok. Paper presented at the FAccTRec Workshop on Responsible Recommendation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.07716.pdf
  3. Bardoel, J. & Deuze, M. (2001). Network journalism: Converging competences of media professionals and professionalism. Australian Journalism Review, 23(2), 91-103.
  4. Beer, C. (2019, January 3). Is TikTok setting the scene for music on social media?. https://blog.globalwebindex.com/trends/tiktok-music-social-media/
  5. Borges-Rey, E. (2015). News images on Instagram. Digital Journalism, 3(4), 571-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1034526
  6. Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society. 20(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
  7. Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021). The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720983865
  8. Chaykowski, K. (2015, September 22). Instagram hits 500 million users soaring past Twitter. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kathleenchaykowski/2015/09/22/instagram-hits-400-million-users-soaring-past-twitter/?sh=7b0451083335
  9. Clayton, R. (2019). The context of vertical filmmaking literature. Quarterly Review of Film and Video. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2021.1874853
  10. Corbett, P. (2017, December 6). Beyond the play button: The case for vertical video. Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/beyond-the-play-button-th_b_8347496
  11. Çelenk, H. (2020, August 5). 10 liraya gazete mi olur? Haftalık Gazete’nin yazı işleri müdürü anlatıyor. Journo. https://journo.com.tr/haftalik-gazete
  12. Digital 2021. (2021, 1 August). We Are Social. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2021 Djerf-Pierre, M., Ghersetti, M. & Hedman, U. (2016). Appropriating social media. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152557
  13. Erol, S. (2020). Kent ortamında akıllı telefon kullanımı: Metrobüs yolcuları üzerine etnografik bir araştırma. Intermedia International E-journal, 7(12), 161-182. DOI: 10.21645/intermedia.2020.73
  14. Failory. (2017, September 12). Platform to share short looping video clips. https://www.failory.com/cemetery/vine
  15. Ferguson A,G. (2017, October 3). The police are using computer algorithms to tell if you’re a treat. https://time.com/4966125/police-departments-algorithms-chicago/
  16. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P., Foot, K. (Eds.) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (pp. 167–193). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
  17. Hatton, K. (2021, July 23). How to use the green screen effect on TikTok. Verge. https://www.theverge.com/22588655/tiktok-green-screen-effect-how-to
  18. Hermida, A. (2013). #Journalism: Reconfiguring journalism research about twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.808456
  19. Hermida, A., & Mellado, C. (2020). Dimensions of social media logics: Mapping forms of journalistic norms and practices on Twitter and Instagram. Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864-884. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1805779
  20. Jennings, R. (2019, July 12). TikTok, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/12/10/18129126/tiktok-app-musically-meme-cringe
  21. Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co-evolution of two chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120
  22. Klug, D., Qin, Y., Evans, M.C. & Kaufman, G.F. (2021, June). Trick and please. A mixed-method study on user assumptions about the TikTok algorithm. Presented at 13th ACM Web Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447535.3462512
  23. Kraemer, F., van Overveld, K. & Peterson, M. (2011). Is there an ethics of algorithms?. Ethics Inf.Technol. 13, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9233-7
  24. Kwak, H., Changhyun, L., Hosung, P., Sue M. (2010, April). What is twitter, a social network or a news media?. Paper presented at 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 591–600. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1772690.1772751
  25. Lin, Y. & Yao, D. & Chen, X. (2021). Happiness begets money: Emotion and engagement in live streaming. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211002477
  26. Lischka, J. A. (2021). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism, 22(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918788472
  27. Manjoo, F. (2015, August 12). Vertical video on the small screen. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/13/technology/personaltech/vertical-video-on-the-small-screen-not-a-crime.html?_r=0
  28. McGlew, M. (2020 January 14). This is How the TikTok Algorithm Works. https://later.com/blog/tiktok-algorithm
  29. Mulier, L., Slabbinck, H. & Vermeir, I. (2021). This way up: The effectiveness of mobile vertical video marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 55, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.12.002
  30. Newton, C. (2016, August 11). Why Vine died: Closing the loop. https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/28/13456208/why-vine-died-twitter-shutdown
  31. Omnicore. (2020, August 30). TikTok by the numbers: Stats, demographics & fun facts. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/tiktok-statistics/
  32. Perez, S. (2020, April 6). Kids now spend nearly as much time watching TikTok as YouTube in US, UK and Spain. https://techcrunch.com/2020/06/04/kids-now-spend-nearly-as-much-time-watching-tiktok-as-youtube-in-u-s-u-k-and-spain/
  33. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann, S. Pingree (eds). Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, U.S: Sage. https://www.academia.edu/533664/Interactivity_From_new_media_to_communication
  34. Richards, R. (2006). Users, interactivity and generation. New Media & Society, 8(4), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806064485 Sang, Y. & J, Y. Lee., S, Park., Fisher, C., Fuller, G. (2020). Signalling and Expressive interaction: Online news users’ different modes of interaction on digital platforms. Digital Journalism, 8(4), 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1743194
  35. Schifferes, S., Newman, N., Thurman, N., Corney, D., Göker, A. & Martin, C. (2014). Identifying and verifying vews through social Media. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 406-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.892747
  36. Sohn, D. (2011). Anatomy of interaction experience: Distinguishing sensory, semantic, and behavioral dimensions of interactivity. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1320–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405806
  37. Statista. (2020, July 1). Most Popular Content Categories on TikTok. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1130988/most-popular-categories-tiktok-worldwide-hashtag-views/
  38. Thurman, N. (2018). Social media, surveillance, and news work. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 76-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345318
  39. Tüfekçi, Z. (2021, March 5). The Clubhouse App and the Rise of Oral Psychodynamics. https://www.theinsight.org/p/the-clubhouse-app-and-the-rise-of
  40. van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
  41. Vine. (2016, August 11). Important news about Vine. https://medium.com/@vine/important-news-about-vine-909c5f4ae7a7
  42. Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in U.S. journalism. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162
  43. Weimann, G. & Masri, N. (2020). Spreading hate on TikTok. Conflict & Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1780027
  44. Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
  45. Qiu, H., Klug, D. (2021, October). Motivations and expectations for virtual gift-giving in Douyin livestreams. Paper presented at AoIR 2021: The 22nd Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers. Virtual Event: AoIR. Retrieved from http://spir.aoir.org.
  46. Yang, F., & Shen, F. (2018). Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research. 45(5), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217700748
  47. Yang, S., Zhao, Y.L., & Ma, Y. (2021, April). Analysis of the reasons and development of short video application, taking TikTok as an example. 2nd International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352600075_Research_on_an_Empirical_Analysis_of_Short_Video_Transmission_in_Kindergartens_Based_on_SPSS_--Taking_Tik_Tok_as_an_Example
  48. Yu, Z. (2021). An empirical study of consumer video activism in China: Protesting against businesses with short videos. Chinese Journal of Communication, 14(3), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1871390
  49. Yu, X. (2019). User-Generated News: Netizen Journalism in China in the Age of Short Video. Global Media and China. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436419836064
  50. Zhicong, L. & Haijun, X., Seongkook, H. & Daniel, W. (2018, April). You watch, you give, and you engage: A study of live streaming practices in China. Presented at the ACM 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAt. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322950915_You_Watch_You_Give_and_You_Engage_A_Study_of_Live_Streaming_Practices_in_China
  51. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2020). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
  52. Zhao, Y. (2020, August). Analysis of TikTok’s success based on its algorithm mechanism. Paper presented at International Conference on Big Data and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9434487
  53. Zhao, Z. (2021, February). Analysis on the “Douyin (Tiktok) Mania” phenomenon based on recommendation algorithms. Paper presented at International Conference on New Energy Technology and Industrial Development. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123503029
  54. Zhang, X. & Li, W. (2020). From social media with news: journalists’ social media use for sourcing and verification. Journalism Practice, 14(10), 1193-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1689372