KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2

Orman yangınları sonrasında ağaçların canlılık durumlarının tahmin edilmesi

Predicting post-fire tree mortality

Coşkun Okan Güney(EGE ORMANCILIK ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ, ORMAN YANGINLARI ARAŞTIRMALARI BAŞMÜHENDİSLİĞİ)0000-0003-4664-8024
Aylin Güney(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8955-2770
Sayfa
220–232
Yayın Tarihi
2024-06-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu amaçla, orman yangınları sonrasındaki ağaç ölüm mekanizmaları, canlılık durumu modellemelerinde kullanılan değişkenler ve ölçme yöntemleri, modellerin oluşturulması ve oluşturulan modellerin nasıl kullanılabileceği hakkında bilgiler verilmiş, bundan sonra yapılacak çalışmalar için literatür özetlenerek konunun iyi ve eksik yönleri tartışılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bir orman yangınından sonra, farklı derecelerde yanmış alanlardan oluşan mozaik bir yapı meydana gelmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Tahminler yapılırken ağacın farklı kısımlarındaki zarar derecesi, morfolojik özellikler, yangın davranışı özellikleri ve ikinci dereceden ölüm etkenleri dikkate alınabilir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu amaçla, orman yangınları sonrasındaki ağaç ölüm mekanizmaları, canlılık durumu modellemelerinde kullanılan değişkenler ve ölçme yöntemleri, modellerin oluşturulması ve oluşturulan modellerin nasıl kullanılabileceği hakkında bilgiler verilmiş, bundan sonra yapılacak çalışmalar için literatür özetlenerek konunun iyi ve eksik yönleri tartışılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yangın ekolojisi · yangın hasarı · yangın zararı

Özet

Bir orman yangınından sonra, farklı derecelerde yanmış alanlardan oluşan mozaik bir yapı meydana gelmektedir. Kısmen yanmış ve yaşama ihtimali olan ağaçların ölüp ölmeyeceğinin tahmin edilmesi, yangın sonrası odun üretimi ve silvikültürel planlamalar için önemlidir. Yangın sonrası ağaçların canlılık durumlarının doğru şekilde tahmin edilebilmesi ise yangının meydana gelme süreçlerinin ve sonrasında ağaçlara nasıl zarar verdiğinin iyi bilinmesine bağlıdır. Tahminler yapılırken ağacın farklı kısımlarındaki zarar derecesi, morfolojik özellikler, yangın davranışı özellikleri ve ikinci dereceden ölüm etkenleri dikkate alınabilir. Genellikle lojistik regresyon yöntemi kullanılarak modellenmektedir. Bu modeller belirli doğruluk düzeyinde canlılık durumu tahminleri sağlamaktadır ve bireysel ağaçlar için oluşturulabileceği gibi meşcere düzeyinde de değerlendirilebilir. Bu derlemenin amacı, yangın sonrası canlılık durumu modelleme çalışmaları için kılavuz nitelinde bilgiler sunmaktır. Bu amaçla, orman yangınları sonrasındaki ağaç ölüm mekanizmaları, canlılık durumu modellemelerinde kullanılan değişkenler ve ölçme yöntemleri, modellerin oluşturulması ve oluşturulan modellerin nasıl kullanılabileceği hakkında bilgiler verilmiş, bundan sonra yapılacak çalışmalar için literatür özetlenerek konunun iyi ve eksik yönleri tartışılmıştır.

Abstract

After a forest fire, a mosaic structure of areas burned to varying degrees is created. Predicting whether partially burned and potentially viable trees will die is crucial for post-fire timber production and silvicultural planning. A good understanding of the processes of fire occurence and fire damage to trees is essential for precise prediction of post-fire tree mortality. The degree of damage to different parts of the tree, morphological characteristics, fire behavior characteristics, and secondary mortality factors can be taken into account when making predictions and are usually modeled using logistic regression. These models provide mortality estimates at a certain level of accuracy and can be used for individual trees or stand level. The aim of this review is to provide guidelines for post-fire mortality modeling research. To this end, our review provides information on the mechanisms of post-fire tree mortality, variables and measurements used in mortality modeling, model construction and application, summarizes the literature for future studies, and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the topic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Güney, C. O., Güney, A. (2024). Orman yangınları sonrasında ağaçların canlılık durumlarının tahmin edilmesi. Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1441012

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (92)

  1. Adams, H.D., Williams, A.P., Xu, C., Rauscher, S.A., Jiang, X., McDowell, N.G., 2013. Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 438. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2013.00438
  2. Agee, J. K., 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island press, California, ABD.
  3. Alexander, M.E., Cruz, M.G., Taylor, S.W., 2020. Crown scorch height. In: Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires (Ed: Manzello S.L.), Springer, Gaithersburg, USA, pp.197-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_72-1
  4. Anderegg, W.R., Hicke, J.A., Fisher, R.A., Allen, C.D., Aukema, J., Bentz, B., Hood, S., Lichstein, J.W., Macalady, A.K., McDowell, N., Pan, Y., Raffa, K., Sala, A., Shaw, J.D., Stephenson, N.L., Tague, C. Zeppel, M., 2015. Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytologist, 208 (3): 674-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13477
  5. Andrews, P., Bevins, C., Seli, R., 2008. BehavePlus fire modelling system, version 4.0: user’s guide. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-106WWW Revised.
  6. Bär, A., Michaletz, S.T., Mayr, S., 2019. Fire effects on tree physiology, New Phytologist. 223: 1728–1741. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15871
  7. Beverly, J.L., Martell, D.L., 2003. Modeling Pinus strobus mortality following prescribed fire in Quetico Provincial Park, northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33 (4): 740-751. https://doi.org/10.1139/X02-209
  8. Bond, W.J., Keeley, J.E., 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20 (7): 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tree.2005.04.025
  9. Bowman, D.M., Balch, J.K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W.J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M.A., D’Antonio, C.M., DeFries, R.S., Doyle, J.C. Harrison, S.P., 2009. Fire in the Earth system. Science, 324 (5926): 481-484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886
  10. Brown, J.K., Debyle, N.V., 1987. Fire damage, mortality, and suckering in aspen. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17 (9): 1100-1109. https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-168
  11. Butler, B., Cohen, J., Latham, D., Schuette, R., Sopko, P., Shannon, K., Jimenez, D., Bradshaw, L., 2004. Measurements of radiant emissive power and temperatures in crown fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(8): 1577-1587. https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-060
  12. Cansler, C.A., Hood, S.M., van Mantgem, P.J., Varner, J.M., 2020. A large database supports the use of simple models of post-fire tree mortality for thick-barked conifers, with less support for other species. Fire Ecology, 16(1): 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-020-00082-0
  13. Catry, F., Rego, F., Moreira, F., Fernandes, P., Pausas, J., 2010a. Post-fire tree mortality in mixed forests of central Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(7): 1184-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.010
  14. Catry, F.X., Rego, F.C., Bação, F.L., Moreira, F., 2010b. Modeling and mapping wildfire ignition risk in Portugal. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18 (8): 921-931.
  15. Chatziefstratiou, E.K., Bohrer, G., Bova, A.S., Subramanian, R., Frasson, R.P.M., Scherzer, A., Butler, B.W., Dickinson, M. B., 2013. FireStem2D – A Two-Dimensional heat transfer model for simulating tree stem injury in fires. Plos One, 8 (7): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070110
  16. Cruz, M., Butler, B., Alexander, M., Forthofer, J., Wakimoto, R., 2006. Predicting the ignition of crown fuels above a spreading surface fire. Part I: Model idealization, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15(1): 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF04061 Davis, R.S., Hood, S., Bentz, B.J., 2012. Fire-injured ponderosa pine provide a pulsed resource for bark beetles, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42(12): 2022-2036. https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-147
  17. DeNitto, G., Cramer, B., Gibson, K., Lockman, B., McConnell, T., Stipe, L., Sturdevant, N., Taylor, J., 2000. Survivability and deterioration of fire-injured trees in the northern Rocky Mountains: a review of the literature. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, 2000-13.
  18. Dickinson, M.B., Johnson, E.A., 2001. Fire effects on trees, In: Forest Fires, (Ed., Edward A.J. and Miyanishi K.), Elsevier, Canada, pp. 477-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012386660-8/50016-7
  19. Dickinson, M.B., Johnson, E.A., 2004. Temperature-dependent rate models of vascular cambium cell mortality. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(3): 546-559. https://doi.org/10.1139/X03-223
  20. Fairman, T.A., Nitschke, C.R., Bennett, L.T., 2016. Too much, too soon? A review of the effects of increasing wildfire frequency on tree mortality and regeneration in temperate eucalypt forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 25 (8):831-848. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf15010
  21. Finney, M.A., Martin, R.E., 1993. Modeling effects of prescribed fire on young-growth coast redwood trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(6): 1125-1135. https://doi.org/ 10.1139/x93-143
  22. Flannigan, M., Stocks, B., Turetsky, M., Wotton, M., 2009. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Global Change Biology, 15(3): 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01660.x
  23. Furniss, T.J., Larson, A.J., Kane, V.R., Lutz, J.A., 2019. Multi-scale assessment of post-fire tree mortality models. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(1): 46-61. https://doi.org/ 10.1071/wf18031
  24. Grayson, L.M., Progar, R.A., Hood, S.M., 2017. Predicting post-fire tree mortality for 14 conifers in the Pacific Northwest, USA: Model evaluation, development, and thresholds. Forest Ecology and Management, 399: 213-226. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.038
  25. Güney, C.O., Güney, A., 2020. Assessing fire severity, bark char codes, and cambium damage to determine post-fire tree mortality in Turkish Red Pine, 10th International Ecology Symposium, 26-28 November, Bursa, Türkiye, pp. 132.
  26. Güney, C.O., Güney, A., Sarı, A., Kavgacı, A., 2021. Kızılçamın yangın sonrası canlılık durumunun modellenmesi. T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Batı Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Proje Sonuç Raporu, Proje Numarası: 19.9401/2018-2021, Antalya.
  27. Güney, C.O., Sarı, A., Cekim, H.O., Küçüksille, E.U., Sentürk, Ö., Gülsoy, S., Özkan, K., 2022. An advanced approach for leaf flammability index estimation. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 31(3): 277-290. https://doi.org/ 10.1071/WF21022
  28. Hare, R.C., 1965. Notes and observations: Chemical test for fire damage. Journal of Forestry, 63(12): 939-939.
  29. Harrington, M., 1993. Predicting Pinus ponderosa mortality from dormant season and growing-season fire injury. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 3(2): 65-72.
  30. Heikkilä, T.V., Grönqvist, R., Jurvélius, M., 2010. Wildland fire management: handbook for trainers, Roma, Italy, FAO.
  31. Hély, C., Flannigan, M., Bergeron, Y., 2003. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in the southeastern Canadian mixed-wood boreal forest, Forest Science, 49 (4): 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.4.566
  32. Higgins, S.I., Bond, W.J., Trollope, W.S., 2000. Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass–tree coexistence in savanna. Journal of Ecology, 88(2): 213-229.
  33. Hood, S., 2007. Scorch height, http://www.firewords.net/ definitions/scorch_height.htm Accessed: 03.04.2024. Hood, S., Bentz, B., 2007. Predicting postfire Douglas-fir beetle attacks and tree mortality in the northern Rocky Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(6): 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-313
  34. Hood, S., Bentz, B., Gibson, K., Ryan, K. DeNitto, G., 2007a. Assessing post-fire Douglas-fir mortality and Douglas-fir beetle attacks in the northern Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-199
  35. Hood, S., Lutes, D., 2017. Predicting post-fire tree mortality for 12 Western US conifers using the first order fire effects model (FOFEM). Fire Ecology, 13 (2): 66-84. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.130290243
  36. Hood, S.M., McHugh, C.W., Ryan, K.C., Reinhardt, E., Smith, S. L., 2007b. Evaluation of a post-fire tree mortality model for western USA conifers. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16(6): 679-689.
  37. Hood, S.M., Cluck, D.R., Smith, S.L., Ryan, K.C., 2008. Using bark char codes to predict post-fire cambium mortality. Fire Ecology, 4(1): 57-73. https://doi.org/10.4996/ fireecology.0401057
  38. Hood, S.M., 2010. Mitigating old tree mortality in long-unburned, fire-dependent forests: a synthesis, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-238.
  39. Hood, S.M., Varner, J.M., van Mantgem, P., Cansler, C.A., 2018. Fire and tree death: understanding and improving modeling of fire-induced tree mortality. Environmental Research Letters, 13 (11): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae934
  40. Hood, S.M., Varner, J.M., 2019. Post-fire tree mortality. In: Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires (Ed: Manzello S.L.), Springer, Gaithersburg, USA pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_252-1
  41. Hood, S.M., Ragenovich, I., Schaupp, W.C., 2020. Post-fire assessment of tree status and marking guidelines for conifers in Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. General Technical Report, R6-FHP-RO-2020-02.
  42. Hull Sieg, C., McMillin, J.D., Fowler, J.F., Allen, K.K., Negron, J.F., Wadleigh, L.L., Anhold, J.A., Gibson, K.E., 2006. Best predictors for postfire mortality of ponderosa pine trees in the Intermountain West. Forest Science, 52(6): 718-728. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/52.6.718
  43. Keeley, J.E., 2009. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18 (1): 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1071/ WF07049
  44. Keyser, T.L., Smith, F.W., Lentile, L.B., Shepperd, W.D., 2006. Modeling postfire mortality of ponderosa pine following a mixed-severity wildfire in the Black Hills: the role of tree morphology and direct fire effects. Forest Science, 52 (5): 530-539. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/52.5.530
  45. Kobziar, L., Moghaddas, J., Stephens, S.L., 2006. Tree mortality patterns following prescribed fires in a mixed conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(12): 3222-3238. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-183
  46. Lambert, S., Stohlgren, T.J., 1988. Giant sequoia mortality in burned and unburned stands. Journal of Forestry, 86(2): 44-46.
  47. Liang, S., Hurteau, M.D., Westerling, A.L., 2017. Potential decline in carbon carrying capacity under projected climate-wildfire interactions in the Sierra Nevada. Scientific Reports, 7 (1): 2420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02686-0
  48. Lowell, E. C., 2010. Effects of fire, insect, and pathogen damage on wood quality of dead and dying western conifers, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-816.
  49. Mantgem, P.V., Schwartz, M., 2004. An experimental demonstration of stem damage as a predictor of fire-caused mortality for ponderosa pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(6): 1343-1347. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-001
  50. McDowell, N.G., Beerling, D.J., Breshears, D.D., Fisher, R.A., Raffa, K.F., Stitt, M., 2011. The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(10): 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003
  51. McHugh, C.W., Kolb, T.E., 2003a. Ponderosa pine mortality following fire in northern Arizona. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12 (1): 7-22.
  52. McHugh, C.W., Kolb, T.E., 2003b. Corrigendum to: ponderosa pine mortality following fire in northern Arizona. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12(2): 245-245. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF02054
  53. McHugh, C.W., Kolb, T.E. Wilson, J.L., 2003. Bark beetle attacks on ponderosa pine following fire in northern Arizona. Environmental Entomology, 32(3): 510-522.
  54. Michaletz, S., Johnson, E., 2008. A biophysical process model of tree mortality in surface fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38 (7): 2013-2029. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-024
  55. Michaletz, S.T., Johnson, E.A., 2006. A heat transfer model of crown scorch in forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(11): 2839-2851. https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-158
  56. Michaletz, S.T., Johnson, E.A., 2007. How forest fires kill trees: a review of the fundamental biophysical processes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22(6): 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701803544
  57. Michaletz, S.T., 2018. Xylem dysfunction in fires: towards a hydraulic theory of plant responses to multiple disturbance stressors. New Phytologist, 217(4): 1391-1393.
  58. Outcalt, K.W., Wade, D.D., 2004. Fuels management reduces tree mortality from wildfires in southeastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 28(1): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/28.1.28
  59. Pausas, J.G., Keeley, J.E., 2017. Epicormic resprouting in fire-prone ecosystems. Trends in Plant Science, 22 (12): 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.010
  60. Peterson, D.L., 1985. Crown scorch volume and scorch height: estimates of postfire tree condition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15(3): 596-598.
  61. Peterson, D.L., Ryan, K.C., 1986. Modeling postfire conifer mortality for long-range planning. Environmental Management, 10(6): 797-808.
  62. Peterson, D.L., Arbaugh, M.J., 1989. Estimating postfire survival of Douglas-fir in the Cascade Range. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19(4): 530-533.
  63. Pounden, E., Greene, D.F., Michaletz, S.T., 2014. Non‐serotinous woody plants behave as aerial seed bank species when a late‐summer wildfire coincides with a mast year. Ecology and Evolution, 4 (19): 3830-3840. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1247
  64. Quevedo, L., Rodrigo, A., Espelta, J.M., 2007. Post-fire resprouting ability of 15 non-dominant shrub and tree species in Mediterranean areas of NE Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 64 (8): 883-890. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007053
  65. Raymond, C.L., Peterson, D.L., 2005. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(12): 2981-2995. https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-206
  66. Reed, C.C., Hood, S.M., 2024. Nonstructural carbohydrates explain post-fire tree mortality and recovery patterns. Tree Physiol, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpad155
  67. Regelbrugge, J.C., Conard, S.G., 1993. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in Pinus ponderosa forests in the central Sierra-Nevada of California. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 3(3): 139-148.
  68. Reinhardt, E.D., Keane, R.E., Brown, J.K., 1997. First order fire effects model: FOFEM 4.0 user's guide. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, PB-97-133011/XAB; FSGTR/INT-344.
  69. Reinhardt, E.D., Crookston, N.L., 2003. The fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-116.
  70. Rigolot, E., 2004. Predicting postfire mortality of Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinea L. Plant Ecology, 171(1): 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029382.59284.71
  71. Rodríguez-Trejo, D.A., Castro-Solis, U.B., Zepeda-Bautista, M., Carr, R.J., 2007. First year survival of Pinus hartwegii following prescribed burns at different intensities and different seasons in central Mexico. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16(1): 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05061
  72. Ryan, K.C., 1982a. Evaluating potential tree mortality from prescribed burning, Site preparation and fuels management on steep terrain: proceedings of a symposium, Washington State University, Spokane, 15-17 February, Washington, pp. 15-17.
  73. Ryan, K.C., 1982b. Techniques for assessing fire damage to trees. Fire, its Field Effects. Intermountain Fire Council, 19-21 October, Missoula, Montana, USA, pp. 1-11.
  74. Ryan, K.C., Noste, N. V., 1985. Evaluating prescribed fires, in: JE Lotan et al.(tech. coor), Proceedings - Symposium and Workshop on Wilderness Fire, USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiement Station, General Technical Report INT-182. Utah State University, 230-238.
  75. Ryan, K.C., Reinhardt, E.D., 1988. Predicting postfire mortality of seven western conifers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18(10): 1291-1297.
  76. Ryan, K.C., Amman, G.D., 1996. Bark beetle activity and delayed tree mortality in the Greater Yellowstone Area following the 1988 fires. Proceedings of the Second Biennial Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The Ecological Implications of Fire in the Greater Yellowstone, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairland, Washington, USA, pp. 151–158.
  77. Ryan, K.C., 2002. Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. Silva Fennica, 36(1): 13-39. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.548
  78. Ryan, K.C., Jones, A.T., Koerner, C.L., Lee, K.M., 2012. Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Cultural Resources and Archaeology, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 3. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 224 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-42
  79. Satio, K., 2001. Flames. In: Forest Fires Behavior and Ecological Effects, (Ed: Johnson E.A., Miyanishi K.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 11-54.
  80. Schwilk, D.W., Knapp, E.E., Ferrenberg, S.M., Keeley, J.E., Caprio, A.C., 2006. Tree mortality from fire and bark beetles following early and late season prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 232(1): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.036
  81. Shearman, T.M., Varner, J.M., Hood, S.M., Cansler, C.A., Hiers, J.K., 2019. Modelling post-fire tree mortality: Can random forest improve discrimination of imbalanced data?. Ecological Modelling, 414, 108855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel. 2019.108855
  82. Sidoroff, K., Kuuluvainen, T., Tanskanen, H., Vanha-Majamaa, I., 2007. Tree mortality after low-intensity prescribed fires in managed Pinus sylvestris stands in southern Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22(1): 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580500365935
  83. Stephens, S.L., Finney, M.A., 2002. Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion. Forest Ecology and Management, 162(2): 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00521-7
  84. Thies, W.G., Westlind, D.J., Loewen, M., Brenner, G., 2006. Prediction of delayed mortality of fire-damaged ponderosa pine following prescribed fires in eastern Oregon, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15(1): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05025
  85. Thompson, M.T.C., Koyama, A., Kavanagh, K.L., 2017. Wildfire effects on physiological properties in conifers of central Idaho forests, USA. Trees, 31(2): 545-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1489-z
  86. Valor, T., Casals, P., Altieri, S., González-Olabarria, J.R., Piqué, M., Battipaglia, G., 2018. Disentangling the effects of crown scorch and competition release on the physiological and growth response of Pinus halepensis Mill. using δ13C and δ18O isotopes. Forest Ecology and Management, 424: 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.056
  87. Van Mantgem, P., Schwartz, M., 2003. Bark heat resistance of small trees in Californian mixed conifer forests: testing some model assumptions. Forest Ecology and Management, 178(3): 341-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00554-6
  88. Von Gadow, K., 2000. Evaluating risk in forest planning models. Silva Fennica, 34(2): 181-191. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.639
  89. Wagner, C.E.V., 1973. Height of crown scorch in forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 3(3): 373-378.
  90. Wallin, K.F., Kolb, T.E., Skov, K.R., Wagner, M.R., 2003. Effects of crown scorch on ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in northern Arizona. Environmental Entomology, 32(3): 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.3.652
  91. Woolley, T., Shaw, D.C., Ganio, L.M., Fitzgerald, S., 2012. A review of logistic regression models used to predict post-fire tree mortality of western North American conifers. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 21(1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09039
  92. Hood, S.M., Ragenovich, I., Schaupp, W.C., 2020. Post-fire assessment of tree status and marking guidelines for conifers in Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. General Technical Report, R6-FHP-RO-2020-02.