KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Assessing Blockchain Integration in the Turkish Land Registry System: A Conceptual Model

Ümit Gedik(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, GAYRİMENKUL GELİŞTİRME VE YÖNETİMİ (DR))0000-0002-8687-3659
Orhan Ercan(ANKARA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PR.)0000-0001-5231-8692
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-06
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Overall, the findings present a realistic, scalable framework for strengthening transparency, institutional trust, and interoperability in land administration.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Digital transformation has become increasingly central to public service delivery, and land administration is no exception.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although recent digital initiatives such as TAKBIS and Web-Tapu have significantly modernized administrative processes, they have not fully resolved persistent challenges, including data security concerns, procedural delays, fragmented stakeholder integration, and limited auditability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Overall, the findings present a realistic, scalable framework for strengthening transparency, institutional trust, and interoperability in land administration.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Blockchain technology · Land Management · Land registry

Abstract

Digital transformation has become increasingly central to public service delivery, and land administration is no exception. This study examines the applicability and implications of integrating blockchain technology into Türkiye’s land registry system through a conceptual model. Although recent digital initiatives such as TAKBIS and Web-Tapu have significantly modernized administrative processes, they have not fully resolved persistent challenges, including data security concerns, procedural delays, fragmented stakeholder integration, and limited auditability. Drawing on international experiences from Sweden, Georgia, India, the United Arab Emirates, Brazil, Honduras, and Bangladesh, the study conducts a comparative assessment and adapts the key lessons to Türkiye’s institutional, legal, and technical context. The proposed blockchain-supported conceptual model aims to enhance data integrity, automate verification processes through smart contracts, and introduce immutable audit trails while functioning as a complementary layer rather than a replacement for existing centralized structures. The model is aligned with Türkiye’s national digital transformation agenda and is expected to contribute to selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDGs 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). At the same time, the study acknowledges challenges related to legal infrastructure, accessibility, digital literacy, and the high cost of technical implementation. Overall, the findings present a realistic, scalable framework for strengthening transparency, institutional trust, and interoperability in land administration.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gedik, Ü., Ercan, O. (2026). Assessing Blockchain Integration in the Turkish Land Registry System: A Conceptual Model. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1895953

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (56)

  1. Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0034-9
  2. Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355-364.
  3. Mezkit, M. (2020). Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü’nün Endüstri 4.0 Uygulamaları. Yeni Fikir Dergisi, 12 (24), 21-43.
  4. Alkashto, H., & Elewi, A. (2024). Integration of blockchain and machine learning for safe and efficient autonomous car systems: A survey. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(2), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1366248
  5. Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N. B., Liman Kaban, A., Taşçı, A., & Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital Bilgi Çağı: Dijital Toplum, Dijital Dönüşüm, Dijital Eğitim ve Dijital Yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7 (2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584
  6. Ethiraj, N., Sivabalan, T., Sofia, J., Harika, D., & Nikolova, P. (2025). A comprehensive review on application of machine intelligence in additive manufacturing. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(1), 37-46. DOI: 10.31127/tuje.1502587
  7. Karahan, Ç. (2023). Dijital Dönüşüm İçin Blokzincir Kullanımına Yönelik Bir Karar Verme Modeli Önerisi: Kamu İhale Süreci Uygulama Örneği. PhD Thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi.
  8. TKGM. (2025a). Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü İşlem Rehberi. Official Publications. https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/basin-i/yayinlarimiz
  9. Yağcı, Ö. (2021). Gayrimenkul Mevzuati Kapsaminda Yasal Süreçler ve Elektronik İmza ile Yapi Ruhsati Uygulama Önerisi. Master Thesis, Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Gayrimenkul Gel. ve Yön. ABD.
  10. Tekelioğlu, N. (2022). Dijital Tapu Sicili: Blokzinciri Teknolojisinin Tapu Sicilinde Kullanılmasına Dair Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme. İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Yayınevi, 80(1), 1-39, DOI: 10.26650/mecmua.2022.80.1.0001.
  11. Tunçer, S. (2023). Blokzincir Tabanlı Akıllı Sözleşme Kullanarak Güvenli Veri Saklama ve Veri Doğrulama. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elektronik ve Bilgisayar Müh. ABD, PhD Thesis, Bilecik.
  12. Vos, J., Lemmen C., & Beentjes. B. (2017). Blockchain-Based Land Administration Feasible, Illusory or A Panacae?. 2017. World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty.
  13. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
  14. Junaid, L., Bilal, K., Khalid, O., & Erbad, A. (2023). Blockchain-Enabled Land Management Systems. Telecommunication Systems, 84, 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-023-01032-2
  15. Thakur, V., Doja, M. N., Dwivedi, Y. K., Ahmad, T., & Khandanga, G. (2020). Land records on Blockchain for implementation of Land Titling in India. International Journal of Information Management, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.013
  16. Çetin, M. (2022). Tapu Kayıt Sistemlerinde Blokzincir Kullanılması ve Türk Tapu Sicili Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi. Terazi Hukuk Dergisi, 17 (191), 34-52. ISSN: 1306-9802
  17. Ekmekçi, H. S. (2019). Applicability of Blockchain Technology to Turkish Land Registry System. Tilburg University, International Business Law, Master Thesis.
  18. Ahmmad, M. R., Al Rafi, A., Islam, A., Sharker, S. U., Rafi, Z. H., Hasan, M., Ali, S., & Khan, S. H. (2024). Enhancing Land Management Policy in Bangladesh: A Blockchain-Based Framework for Transparent and Efficient Land Management. Land Use Policy, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.landusepol.2024.107436.
  19. Saari, A., Junnila, S., & Vimpari, J. (2022). Blockchain’s Grand Promise for the Real Estate Sector: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311940
  20. Mendi, A. F. (2021). Blokzincir Tabanlı Gayrimenkul El Değişim Sistemi İle Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kullanılarak Kamu Yatırımlarının Bölgesel Fiyat Belirlemedeki Etkisinin Hiyerarşik Model İle Ortaya Çıkarılması; İzmir Örneği. PhD Thesis. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü.
  21. Kargar, P. (2019). Akıllı Sözleşme Tabanlı Tapu Kayıt Sistemi. Master Thesis. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Isparta.
  22. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.
  23. Garcia-Teruel R. M. (2020). Legal challenges and opportunities of blockchain technology in the real estate sector. Journal of Property Planning, and Environmental Law, 12(2), 129-145. DOI: 10.1108/JPPEL-07-2019-0039
  24. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  25. Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017). A blockchain research framework: What we (don’t) know, where we go from here, and how we will get there. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 385-409. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0
  26. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on Blockchain Technology? A Systematic Review. Plos One, 11(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0163477
  27. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548
  28. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://ethereum.org/whitepaper/
  29. Yontar, E. (2023). Challenges, threats and advantages of using blockchain technology in the framework of sustainability of the logistics sec. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7(3), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1094375
  30. Duygu, R., & Karaarslan, E. (2025). Towards a barrier-free virtual world and metaverse: Fairverse. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(4), https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1752298
  31. Alam, K. M., Rahman A., Tasnim, A., & Akther, A. (2022). A Blockchain-based Land Title Management System for Bangladesh. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34, 3096-3110.
  32. Priyadarshi, A., & Sree, T. R. (2025). Multi-tier blockchain-based land registry using fog computing. IEEE Access. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528457
  33. Casey, M. J., & Wong, P. (2017). Global supply chains are about to get better, thanks to blockchain. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/03/global-supply-chains-are-about-to-get-better-thanks-to-blockchain
  34. Lemieux, V. (2017). Evaluating the Use of Blockchain in Land Transactions: An Archival Science Perspective. European Property Law Journal, 392-440.
  35. Keirns, G. (2017) Blockchain Land Registry Tech Gets Test in Brazil. www.coindesk.com
  36. Lemieux, V., Flores, D., & Lacombe, C. (2018). Title and code: Real Estate Transaction Recording in the Blockchain in Brazil. Records in the Chain Project, University of British Columbia. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10569.85606
  37. Alketbi, A., Nasir, Q., & Talib, M. A. (2018). Blockchain for government services - Use cases, security benefits, and challenges. IEEE Access, 7. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817610
  38. Khan, S., Shael, M., Majdalawieh, M., Nizamuddin, N., & Nicho, M. (2022). Blockchain for Governments: The Case of the Dubai Government. Sustainability, 14, 6576. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116576
  39. Narayanaprakash, K., Malarchelvi, S. K., Ranjithkumar, S., Sridevi, R., Anitha, P. & Kumar, N. S. (2023). A Survey Analysıs on Decentralızed Land Regıstry System Usıng Blockchaın and Smart Contracts. 2023 International Conference on Computer Science and Emerging Technologies (CSET). DOI: 10.1109/CSET58993.2023.10346967
  40. Nazir, A. (2023). An Optimized Concurrent Proof of Authority Consensus Protocol. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 874-877. DOI: 10.1109/SANER56733.2023.00105
  41. Bratcher, L. (2024). Blockchain Land Registry Best Practices: The Political and Technical Feasibility of Harnessing Blockchain Technology to Improve Land Administration. PhD Thesis. The University of Texas at Dallas.
  42. Ameyaw, P.D., & de Vries, W.T. (2021). Toward Smart Land Management: Land Acquisition and the Associated Challenges in Ghana. A Look into a Blockchain Digital Land Registry for Prospects. Land 2021, 10, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030239
  43. OECD. (2021). OECD Blockchain in Development Report. https://www.oecd.org/.
  44. Paavo, J. P., Rodríguez Puentes, R. & Chigbu, U. E. (2025). Practicality of Blockchain Technology for Land Registration: A Namibian Case Study. Land, 14. DOI: 10.3390/land14081626
  45. Lawal, O. O., Nawari, N. O., & Alem, B. W. (2022). Geospatial Blockchain for Land Registration and Cadastral Data Management using Geographical Information System: A Theoretical Framework. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Congress, Spain.
  46. Habib, M., Okayli, M., & Habib, A. (2025). Proposing a framework for blockchain-based implementation in cadastral systems of conflict-impacted communities. Discover Computing, 28, 178. DOI: 10.1007/s10791-025-09698-9
  47. Polat, Z. A. (2017). Arazi Yönetiminin Tapu ve Kadastro İşlemlerine Yönelik Harici Veri Modeli Tasarimi ve Uygulaması. PhD Thesis, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  48. TKGM. (2014). Tapu Sicili Uygulamaları. Karamete Tasarım Yayınevi, Baskı-1. Official Publications, Ankara.
  49. Şen, N., & Ercan, O. (2023). Web Tapu applications from perspective of employees. 3. International Conference on Real Estate Development and Management, Ankara.
  50. Alkan, A. O. (2020). Blokzincir Teknolojisinin Benimsenmesini Etkileyen Faktörler: Güvenlik Açısından Ampirik Bir Çalışma. Master Thesis. Baskent University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Tech. and Inf. Management.
  51. Çoruhlu, Y. E., Alemdar, A., & Çelik, M. Ö. (2024). Taşınmaz Satışlarında Noterlerin Yetkilendirilmesinin Tapu Sistemi Olası Etkilerinin Kadastro 2014 Vizyonuyla Araştırılması. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(3), 1245-1274. DOI: 10.31466/kfbd.1449638
  52. TKGM. (2025b). İdare Faaliyet Raporu 2024. https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/en/node/331.
  53. Nair, A., Patel, H., Parmar, V., Agrawal, S., & Vala, B. (2024). Land registration System Using Blockchain. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET), 13(3), 45-52. DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2024.1303076
  54. Proskurovska, A., & Dörry, S. (2022). The blockchain challenge for Sweden's housing and mortgage markets. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(8), 1569-1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221116896
  55. Ünal, G. & Uluyol, Ç. (2020). Blok Zinciri Teknolojisi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(2), 167-175. DOI: 10.17671/gazibtd.516990
  56. Mgungile, J. A., & Tonkal, Ö. (2026). Scalable intrusion detection in IoT networks: A big data analytics approach. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(1), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1793847