KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

ENERJİ VERİMLİ BİNALAR İÇİN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR VE ÇEVRE DOSTU PENCERE VE CAM TEKNOLOJİLERİ: SON GELİŞMELER VE UYGULAMALAR

Sustainable and Environmental Friendly Window and Glass Technologies for Energy Efficient Buildings: Recent Developments and Applications

Ayşe Pınar Mert Cüce(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6522-7092
Tamer Güçlü(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5864-3864
Ahmet Burhaneddin Beşir(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2496-0001
Erdem Cuce(Recep Tayyip Erdogan University)0000-0003-0150-4705
Sayfa
503–522
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Aerogel camlar görsel kaliteyi etkilese de sınırlı bir et kalınlığında ortaya koyduğu benzersiz ısıl direnç açısından farkındalık oluşturmaktadır

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada enerji verimli düşük/sıfır karbon binalar için geliştirilen sürdürülebilir ve çevre dostu pencere ve cam teknolojilerinin kapsamlı bir analizi sunulmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Pencereler bina kabuğundan gerçekleşen toplam ısı kayıplarının yaklaşık %60’ından sorumlu olduğu için, çalışmalar çoğunlukla ısıl direnci yüksek ürün geliştirme üzerine yoğunlaşmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Aerogel camlar görsel kaliteyi etkilese de sınırlı bir et kalınlığında ortaya koyduğu benzersiz ısıl direnç açısından farkındalık oluşturmaktadır
🔬Tür:Derleme
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Binalar · enerji verimliliği · pencereler

Özet

Bu çalışmada enerji verimli düşük/sıfır karbon binalar için geliştirilen sürdürülebilir ve çevre dostu pencere ve cam teknolojilerinin kapsamlı bir analizi sunulmaktadır. Ortalama ısı transfer katsayısı (Uvalue), güneş ısı kazanç katsayısı, görünür ışık geçirgenlik katsayısı, UV ve IR ışık bloklama kapasitesi, termal konfor, maliyet ve ticarileşebilme potansiyeli gibi temel performans kriterleri üzerinden söz konusu yeni nesil pencere ve cam teknolojileri incelenmekte ve konvansiyonel ürünlerle karşılaştırılmaktadır. Pencereler bina kabuğundan gerçekleşen toplam ısı kayıplarının yaklaşık %60’ından sorumlu olduğu için, çalışmalar çoğunlukla ısıl direnci yüksek ürün geliştirme üzerine yoğunlaşmaktadır. Bu manada vakum cam teknolojisi oldukça iyimser sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır. Vakum camlar 0.50 W/m2 K’in altında U değerlerine sahiptir. Bu değer hava ya da argon dolgulu çok katmanlı klasik pencere teknolojilerinde 2.00-2.70 W/m2 K aralığındadır. Isıl dirençli fotovoltaik cam uygulamaları (TRPVG) yaklaşık 1.19 W/m2 K’lik bir U değeri ile hem çift katmanlı camlara göre iki kat daha iyi ısıl yalıtım ortaya koymakta hem de birim m2 ’den yaklaşık 100 W elektrik üretimine imkân tanımaktadır. Low-e camlar sert iklim koşullarında pencere orijinli ısıl kayıpların etkin minimizasyonunda anahtar rol oynamaktadır. Aerogel camlar görsel kaliteyi etkilese de sınırlı bir et kalınlığında ortaya koyduğu benzersiz ısıl direnç açısından farkındalık oluşturmaktadır

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of sustainable and environmentally friendly window and glass technologies developed for energy efficient low / zero carbon buildings. The new generation of window and glass technologies are examined over the basic performance criteria such as average heat transfer coefficient (U-value), solar heat gain coefficient, visible light transmission coefficient, thermal comfort, cost and commercialization potential. As the windows are responsible for the approximate % 60 of heat loss from the building's shell, the works are mostly concentrated on the development of products with high thermal resistance. In this context, vacuum glass technology reveals quite optimistic results. Vacuum glasses have U values below 0.50 W/m2 K. This value is in the range of 2.00-2.70 W/m2 K in air or argon filled multi-layered classical window technologies. Thermal resistance photovoltaic glass applications (TRPVG) provide a U value of about 1.19 W/m2 K. And thus, it provides twice as good thermal insulation compared to double-layer glass, and allows the production of approximately 100 W of electricity per m2 . Low-e glasses play a key role in the efficient minimization of window-based thermal losses in harsh climatic conditions. Although aerogel glasses affect visual quality, it is a very impressive technology because it offers a unique thermal resistance at a limited wall thickness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Cüce, A. P. M., Güçlü, T., Beşir, A. B., Cuce, E. (2019). ENERJİ VERİMLİ BİNALAR İÇİN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR VE ÇEVRE DOSTU PENCERE VE CAM TEKNOLOJİLERİ: SON GELİŞMELER VE UYGULAMALAR. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 503–522. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.562173

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (67)

  1. Baetens, R. Jelle, B. P. ve Gustavsen, A. (2010a) Phase change materials for building applications: A state-of-the-art review, Energy and Buildings, 42(9), 1361–1368. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2010.03.026
  2. Baetens, R. Jelle, B. P. ve Gustavsen, A. (2010b) Properties, requirements and possibilities of smart windows for dynamic daylight and solar energy control in buildings: A state-ofthe-art review, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 94(2), 87–105. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2009.08.021
  3. Bansal, N. K. Garg, S. N. Lugani, N. ve Bhandari, M. S. (1994) Determination of glazing area in direct gain systems for three different climatic zones, Solar Energy, 53(1), 81–90. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(94)90608-4
  4. Carlos, J. S. Corvacho, H. Silva, P. D. ve Castro-Gomes, J. P. (2010) Real climate experimental study of two double window systems with preheating of ventilation air, Energy and Buildings, 42(6), 928–934. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2010.01.003
  5. Casini, M. (2018) Active dynamic windows for buildings: A review, Renewable Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.049
  6. Chae, Y. T. Kim, J. Park, H. ve Shin, B. (2014) Building energy performance evaluation of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) window with semi-transparent solar cells, Applied Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.106
  7. Chaiyapinunt, S. Phueakphongsuriya, B. Mongkornsaksit, K. ve Khomporn, N. (2005) Performance rating of glass windows and glass windows with films in aspect of thermal comfort and heat transmission, Energy and Buildings, 37(7), 725–738. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2004.10.008
  8. Chen, X. Lv, Q. ve Yi, X. (2012) Smart window coating based on nanostructured VO2 thin film, Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 123(13), 1187–1189. doi: 10.1016/J.IJLEO.2011.07.048
  9. Chow, T. Li, C. ve Lin, Z. (2010) Innovative solar windows for cooling-demand climate, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 94(2), 212–220. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2009.09.004
  10. Cuce, E. (2014) Development of innovative window and fabric technologies for low-carbon buildings, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Nottingham, 2014.
  11. Cuce, E. (2018) Accurate and reliable U-value assessment of argon-filled double glazed windows: A numerical and experimental investigation, Energy and Buildings, 171, 100– 106. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2018.04.036
  12. Cuce, E. Besir, A. B. ve Cuce, P. M. (2018) Low/Zero-Carbon Buildings for a Sustainable Future, Low Carbon Transition - Technical, Economic and Policy Assessment: Low Carbon Transition - Technical, Economic and Policy Assessment, InTech. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.74540
  13. Cuce, E. ve Cuce, P. M. (2018) Smart retrofit solutions of buildings toward a low carbon world, Energy Research Journal, 9, 78–87. doi.org/ 10.3844/erjsp.2018.78.87
  14. Cuce, E. ve Cuce, P. M. (2013) A comprehensive review on solar cookers, Applied Energy, 102, 1399–1421. doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2012.09.002
  15. Cuce, E. ve Cuce, P. M. (2017) Solar Pond Window Technology for Energy-Efficient Retrofitting of Buildings: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(5), 1909–1916. doi: 10.1007/s13369-016-2375-0
  16. Cuce, E. ve Cuce, P. M. (2019) Optimised thermal insulation performance of a novel photovoltaic (PV) glazing technology called TRPVG through a comprehensive CFD research: An experimental validation, Energy Reports, 5, 1185–1195. doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.046
  17. Cuce, E. Cuce, P. M. ve Young, C. H. (2016) Energy saving potential of heat insulation solar glass: Key results from laboratory and in-situ testing, Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.134
  18. Cuce, E. ve Riffat, S. B. (2015) A state-of-the-art review on innovative glazing technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.084
  19. Cupelli, D. Nicoletta, F. P. Manfredi, S. Filpo, G. De ve Chidichimo, G. (2009) Electrically switchable chromogenic materials for external glazing, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 93(3), 329–333. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2008.11.010
  20. Delalat, F. Ranjbar, M. ve Salamati, H. (2016) Blue colloidal nanoparticles of molybdenum oxide by simple anodizing method: decolorization by PdCl2 and observation of in-liquid gasochromic coloration, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 144, 165–172. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2015.08.038
  21. Demirbas, M. F. (2006) Thermal Energy Storage and Phase Change Materials: An Overview, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1(1), 85–95. doi: 10.1080/009083190881481
  22. Duer, K. Svendsen, S. Moller Mogensen, M. ve Birck Laustsen, J. (2002) Energy labelling of glazings and windows in Denmark: calculated and measured values, Solar Energy, 73(1), 23–31. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(02)00031-2
  23. Fanger, P. O. Thermal Comfort, Analysis ve Application in Environmental Engineering, Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1970,.
  24. Farid, M. M. Khudhair, A. M. Razack, S. A. K. ve Al-Hallaj, S. (2004) A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications, Energy Conversion and Management, 45(9–10), 1597–1615. doi: 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2003.09.015
  25. Feuermann, D. ve Novoplansky, A. (1998) Reversible low solar heat gain windows for energy savings, Solar Energy, 62(3), 169–175. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00015-2
  26. Gago, E. J. Muneer, T. Knez, M. ve Köster, H. (2015) Natural light controls and guides in buildings. Energy saving for electrical lighting, reduction of cooling load, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.08.002
  27. Ghosh, R. Baker, M. B. ve Lopez, R. (2010) Optical properties and aging of gasochromic WO3, Thin Solid Films, 518(8), 2247–2249. doi: 10.1016/J.TSF.2009.08.003
  28. Goia, F. Zinzi, M. Carnielo, E. ve Serra, V. (2015) Spectral and angular solar properties of a PCM-filled double glazing unit, Energy and Buildings, 87, 302–312. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2014.11.019
  29. Granqvist, C. G. (2014a) Electrochromics for smart windows: Oxide-based thin films and devices, Thin Solid Films, 564, 1–38. doi:10.1016/J.TSF.2014.02.002
  30. Granqvist, C. G. (2014b) Oxide-based chromogenic coatings and devices for energy efficient fenestration: Brief survey and update on thermochromics and electrochromics, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, 32(6), 060801. doi: 10.1116/1.4896489
  31. Hasnain, S. M. (1998) Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, Part I:heat storage materials and techniques, Energy Conversion and Management, 39(11), 1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(98)00025-9
  32. Heiselberg, P. (1994) Draught risk from cold vertical surfaces, Building and Environment, 29(3), 297–301. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(94)90026-4
  33. Hien, W. N. Liping, W. Chandra, A. N. Pandey, A. R. ve Xiaolin, W. (2005) Effects of double glazed facade on energy consumption, thermal comfort and condensation for a typical office building in Singapore, Energy and Buildings, 37(6), 563–572. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2004.08.004
  34. Iqbal, I. ve Al-Homoud, M. S. (2007) Parametric analysis of alternative energy conservation measures in an office building in hot and humid climate, Building and Environment, 42(5), 2166–2177. doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2006.04.011
  35. Jelle, B. P. Gustavsen, A. Nilsen, T. N. ve Jacobsen, T. (2007) Solar material protection factor (SMPF) and solar skin protection factor (SSPF) for window panes and other glass structures in buildings, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 91(4), 342–354. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2006.10.017
  36. Jelle, B. P. Hynd, A. Gustavsen, A. Arasteh, D. Goudey, H. ve diğ. (2012) Fenestration of today and tomorrow: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 96, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2011.08.010
  37. Karlsson, J. Karlsson, B. ve Roos, A. (2001) A simple model for assessing the energy performance of windows, Energy and Buildings, 33(7), 641–651. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00131-6
  38. Krarti, M. Erickson, P. M. and Hillman, T. C. (2005) A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting, Building and Environment, 40(6), 747–754. doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2004.08.007
  39. Lampert, C. M. (1993) Optical switching technology for glazings, Thin Solid Films, 236(1–2), 6–13. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90633-Z
  40. Lemarchand, P. Doran, J. ve Norton, B. (2014) Smart Switchable Technologies for Glazing and Photovoltaic Applications, Energy Procedia, 57, 1878–1887. doi: 10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2014.10.052
  41. Li, D. H. ve Lam, J. C. (2000) Measurements of solar radiation and illuminance on vertical surfaces and daylighting implications, Renewable Energy, 20(4), 389–404. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00126-3
  42. Li, D. H. W. Lam, T. N. T. Chan, W. W. H. and Mak, A. H. L. (2009) Energy and cost analysis of semi-transparent photovoltaic in office buildings, Applied Energy, 86(5), 722– 729. doi:10.1016/J.APENERGY.2008.08.009
  43. Li, D. H. W. Lau, C. C. S. ve Lam, J. C. (2005) Predicting daylight illuminance on inclined surfaces using sky luminance data, Energy, 30(9), 1649–1665. doi: 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2004.04.038
  44. Lien, A. G. Hestnes, A. G. ve Aschehoug, Ø. (1997) The use of transparent insulation in low energy dwellings in cold climates, Solar Energy, 59(1–3), 27–35. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00120-X
  45. Llordés, A. Garcia, G. Gazquez, J. ve Milliron, D. J. (2013) Tunable near-infrared and visible-light transmittance in nanocrystal-in-glass composites, Nature, 500(7462), 323– 326. doi: 10.1038/nature12398
  46. Long, L. ve Ye, H. (2014) How to be smart and energy efficient: A general discussion on thermochromic windows, Scientific reports, 4, 6427.
  47. Maccari, A. ve Zinzi, M. (2000) Simplified algorithms for the Italian energy rating scheme for fenestration in residential buildings, Solar Energy, 69, 75–92. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(01)00045-7
  48. Manz, H. ve Menti, U.-P. (2012) Energy performance of glazings in European climates, Renewable Energy, 37(1), 226–232. doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2011.06.016
  49. Miyazaki, T. Akisawa, A. ve Kashiwagi, T. (2005) Energy savings of office buildings by the use of semi-transparent solar cells for windows, Renewable Energy, 30(3), 281–304. doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2004.05.010
  50. Mukherjee, S. Hsieh, W. L. Smith, N. Goulding, M. ve Heikenfeld, J. (2015) Electrokinetic pixels with biprimary inks for color displays and color-temperature-tunable smart windows, Applied Optics, 54(17), 5603. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.005603
  51. Norton, B. Eames, P. C. Mallick, T. K. Huang, M. J. McCormack, S. J. ve diğ. (2011) Enhancing the performance of building integrated photovoltaics, Solar Energy, 85(8), 1629–1664. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2009.10.004
  52. Olivieri, L. Caamaño-Martín, E. Moralejo-Vázquez, F. J. Martín-Chivelet, N. Olivieri, F. ve diğ. (2014) Energy saving potential of semi-transparent photovoltaic elements for building integration, Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.054
  53. Parkin, I. P. ve Manning, T. D. (2006) Intelligent Thermochromic Windows, Journal of Chemical Education, 83(3), 393. doi: 10.1021/ed083p393
  54. Rezaei, S. D. Shannigrahi, S. ve Ramakrishna, S. (2017) A review of conventional, advanced, and smart glazing technologies and materials for improving indoor environment, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 159, 26–51. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2016.08.026
  55. Roos, A. ve Karlsson, B. (1994) Optical and thermal characterization of multiple glazed windows with low U-values, Solar Energy, 52(4), 315–325. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(94)90138-4
  56. Rudolph, S. E. Dieckmann, J. ve Brodrick, J. (2009) Technologies for smart windows, ASHRAE Journal, 51(7), 104–106. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-69749088341&partnerID=40&md5=498818b186eeba0f27a763bcdef485ad
  57. Shian, S. ve Clarke, D. R. (2016). Electrically tunable window device, Optics Letters, 41(6), 1289. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.001289
  58. Skandalos, N. ve Karamanis, D. (2015) PV glazing technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.145
  59. Skandalos, N. ve Karamanis, D. (2016) Investigation of thermal performance of semitransparent PV technologies, Energy and Buildings. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.072
  60. Smith, G. B. ve Granqvist, C. G. Green Nanotechnology: Solutions for Sustainability and Energy in the Built Environment (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2010), Google Scholar.
  61. Stegou-Sagia, A. Antonopoulos, K. Angelopoulou, C. ve Kotsiovelos, G. (2007) The impact of glazing on energy consumption and comfort, Energy Conversion and Management, 48(11), 2844–2852. doi: 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2007.07.005
  62. Tuchinda, C. Srivannaboon, S. ve Lim, H. W. (2006) Photoprotection by window glass, automobile glass, and sunglasses, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 54(5), 845–854. doi: 10.1016/J.JAAD.2005.11.1082
  63. Wittwer, V. Datz, M. Ell, J. Georg, A. Graf, W. ve diğ. (2004) Gasochromic windows, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 84(1–4), 305–314. doi: 10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2004.01.040
  64. Yohanis, Y. G. ve Norton, B. (1999) Utilization factor for building solar-heat gain for use in a simplified energy model, Applied Energy, 63(4), 227–239. doi: 10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00032-X
  65. Zhang, W. Lu, L. Peng, J. ve Song, A. (2016) Comparison of the overall energy performance of semi-transparent photovoltaic windows and common energy-efficient windows in Hong Kong, Energy and Buildings. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.016
  66. Zhou, X. ve Milbrandt, R. (2014) Demonstration with Energy Assessments of Thermochromic Window Systems., ASHRAE Transactions, 120(1), 330–339. Retrieved fromhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=96045434&site=eds-live&authtype=ip,uid
  67. Fanger, P. O. Thermal Comfort, Analysis ve Application in Environmental Engineering, Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1970,.