KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Effects of Extremophilic PGPR on Growth, Physiological, and Biochemical Responses in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars under Salt Stress

Münüre Tanur Erkoyuncu(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5004-4771
Noyan Eken(EGE UNIVERSITY, EGE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0001-6609-7106
Erdoğan Hakkı(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7147-7875
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-01-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings indicate that extremophilic PGPR strains, particularly P. poae, may contribute to improved stress-related physiological traits in peanut, although their effectiveness depends strongly on host genotype and environmental conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of extremophilic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) applications on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of two peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars (Ayşehanım and Adanur) under salt stress conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Experiments were carried out at two salt concentrations [control (0 mM NaCl) and 300 mM NaCl], including a non-inoculated control and three bacterial inoculations (Pseudomonas extremorientalis, Olivibacter soli, and P. poae).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings indicate that extremophilic PGPR strains, particularly P. poae, may contribute to improved stress-related physiological traits in peanut, although their effectiveness depends strongly on host genotype and environmental conditions.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · Salt stress · PGPR

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of extremophilic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) applications on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of two peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars (Ayşehanım and Adanur) under salt stress conditions. Experiments were carried out at two salt concentrations [control (0 mM NaCl) and 300 mM NaCl], including a non-inoculated control and three bacterial inoculations (Pseudomonas extremorientalis, Olivibacter soli, and P. poae). The results revealed that the Ayşehanım cultivar was more sensitive to salt stress in terms of growth parameters, whereas the Adanur cultivar exhibited a more tolerant profile by maintaining root development and pigment contents. Among the PGPR treatments, PGPR inoculation—particularly P. poae—was associated with improved physiological responses under salinity. In the Adanur cultivar, P. poae application was associated with a 7% increase in SPAD values compared to the control (44.26 → 47.49) and approximately 25% higher carotenoid content (1.86 → 2.32) under 300 mM NaCl stress. These responses suggest a strain-dependent contribution of PGPR to the maintenance of pigment-related traits under saline conditions.Correlation and multivariate analyses revealed strong associations between growth parameters and electrical conductivity (r = –0.72 to –0.85), while total phenolic content (TPC) exhibited positive correlations. Overall, PGPR inoculation showed ameliorative potential against salt stress; however, the magnitude and direction of responses were cultivar- and parameter-dependent. The findings indicate that extremophilic PGPR strains, particularly P. poae, may contribute to improved stress-related physiological traits in peanut, although their effectiveness depends strongly on host genotype and environmental conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erkoyuncu, M. T., Eken, N., Hakkı, E. (2026). Effects of Extremophilic PGPR on Growth, Physiological, and Biochemical Responses in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars under Salt Stress. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1777116

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. Agami, R., Medani, R., Abd El-Mola, I., & Taha, R. (2016). Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or proline induces stress tolerance in basil plants (Ocimum basilicum L.) exposed to water stress. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, 2(5), 78.
  2. Akram, N. A., Shafiq, F., & Ashraf, M. (2018). Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): A Prospective Legume Crop to Offer Multiple Health Benefits Under Changing Climate. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 17(5), 1325-1338. http://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12383
  3. Al-Turki, A., Murali, M., Omar, A. F., Rehan, M., & Sayyed, R. Z. (2023). Recent advances in PGPR-mediated resilience toward interactive effects of drought and salt stress in plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1214845. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1214845
  4. Alexander, A., Singh, V. K., & Mishra, A. (2020). Halotolerant PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BJ01 Induces Salt Tolerance by Modulating Physiology and Biochemical Activities of Arachis hypogaea. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 568289. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.568289
  5. Ali, B., Wang, X., Saleem, M. H., Sumaira, Hafeez, A., Afridi, M. S., Khan, S., Zaib Un, N., Ullah, I., Amaral Junior, A. T. D., Alatawi, A., Ali, S.,. (2022). PGPR-Mediated Salt Tolerance in Maize by Modulating Plant Physiology, Antioxidant Defense, Compatible Solutes Accumulation and Bio-Surfactant Producing Genes. Plants 11(3), 345. http://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030345
  6. Arora, A., Sairam, R., & Srivastava, G. (2002). Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants. Current science, 1227-1238. http://doi.org/www.jstor.org/stable/24107045
  7. Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. (2013). Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 51(2), 163-190. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6
  8. Baniaghil, N., Arzanesh, M., Ghorbanli, M., & Shahbazi, M. (2013). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth parameters, antioxidant enzymes and microelements of canola under salt stress. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 3(1), 17-27.
  9. Blois, M. S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181(4617), 1199-1200. http://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  10. Cappellari, L. d. R., Chiappero, J., Palermo, T. B., Giordano, W., & Banchio, E. (2020). Volatile organic compounds from rhizobacteria increase the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and improve the antioxidant status in Mentha piperita L. grown under salt stress. Agronomy, 10(8), 1094. http://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081094
  11. Desheva, G., Desheva, G. N., & Stamatov, S. K. (2020). Germination and early seedling growth characteristics of Arachis hypogaea L. under salinity (NaCl) stress. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 85(2), 113-121.
  12. Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S., Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D., Mishra, J., & Arora, N. K. (2019). Salt-Tolerant Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Enhancing Crop Productivity of Saline Soils. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2791. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02791
  13. Eken, N. (2024). Puccinella distans L. (Jacq). Parl. Bitkisinin Rizosferinden Ekstremofilik Bakterilerin İzolasyonu ve Moleküler Tanımlanması ile PGPR Özelliğine Sahip Olanların Biyokömür Ortamında Ekmeklik Buğday (Triticum avestivum L.) Gelişimi Üzerine Etkisi. (PhD thesis) Selçuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Konya, Türkiye.
  14. Enebe, M. C., & Babalola, O. O. (2018). The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: a survival strategy. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 102(18), 7821-7835. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9214-z
  15. Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008). Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New phytologist, 179(4), 945-963. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x
  16. García‐Gutiérrez, L., Zeriouh, H., Romero, D., Cubero, J., de Vicente, A., & Pérez‐García, A. (2013). The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF 6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate‐and salicylic acid‐dependent defence responses. Microbial Biotechnology, 6(3), 264-274. http://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12028
  17. Huang, A. C., Jiang, T., Liu, Y. X., Bai, Y. C., Reed, J., Qu, B., Goossens, A., Nutzmann, H. W., Bai, Y., Osbourn, A.,. (2019). A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science, 364(6440), eaau6389. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6389
  18. Jiang, H., Qi, P., Wang, T., Chi, X., Wang, M., Chen, M., Chen, N., Pan, L.,. (2019). Role of halotolerant phosphate‐solubilising bacteria on growth promotion of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) under saline soil. Annals of Applied Biology, 174(1), 20-30. http://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12473
  19. Kang, S.-M., Khan, A. L., Waqas, M., You, Y.-H., Kim, J.-H., Kim, J.-G., Hamayun, M., Lee, I.-J.,. (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria reduce adverse effects of salinity and osmotic stress by regulating phytohormones and antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 673-682. http://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.894587
  20. Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In Methods in Enzymology (Vol. 148, pp. 350-382). Elsevier, United States.
  21. Lucy, M., Reed, E., & Glick, B. R. (2004). Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van leeuwenhoek, 86(1), 1-25. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000024903.10757.6e
  22. Lutts, S., Kinet, J., & Bouharmont, J. (1996). NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativaL.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Annals of botany, 78(3), 389-398. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0134
  23. Lyu, D., Backer, R., & Smith, D. L. (2022). Three plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alter morphological development, physiology, and flower yield of Cannabis sativa L. Industrial Crops and Products, 178, 114583. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114583
  24. Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in plant science, 7(9), 405-410. http://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9
  25. Mondal, S., Phadke, R. R., & Badigannavar, A. M. (2015). Genetic variability for total phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity of testaless seeds of a peanut recombinant inbred line population and identification of their controlling QTLs. Euphytica, 204(2), 311-321. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1324-9
  26. Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, cell & environment, 25(2), 239-250. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
  27. Nawaz, A., Shahbaz, M., Asadullah, Imran, A., Marghoob, M. U., Imtiaz, M., & Mubeen, F. (2020). Potential of Salt Tolerant PGPR in Growth and Yield Augmentation of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under Saline Conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 2019. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.02019
  28. Neshat, M., Abbasi, A., Hosseinzadeh, A., Sarikhani, M. R., Dadashi Chavan, D., & Rasoulnia, A. (2022). Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) induce antioxidant tolerance against salinity stress through biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 28(2), 347-361. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01128-0
  29. Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 60(3), 324-349. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010
  30. Ramel, F., Mialoundama, A. S., & Havaux, M. (2013). Nonenzymic carotenoid oxidation and photooxidative stress signalling in plants. Journal of experimental botany, 64(3), 799-805. http://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers223
  31. Safdar, H., Amin, A., Shafiq, Y., Ali, A., Yasin, R., Shoukat, A., Hussan, M. U., Sarwar, M. I.,. (2019). A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Nature and Science, 17(1), 34-40.
  32. Sharma, A., Shahzad, B., Rehman, A., Bhardwaj, R., Landi, M., & Zheng, B. (2019). Response of Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Role of Polyphenols in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Molecules, 24(13), 2452. http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132452
  33. Sharma, S., Kulkarni, J., & Jha, B. (2016). Halotolerant Rhizobacteria Promote Growth and Enhance Salinity Tolerance in Peanut. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1600. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01600
  34. Shukla, P. S., Agarwal, P. K., & Jha, B. (2012). Improved salinity tolerance of Arachis hypogaea (L.) by the interaction of halotolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of plant growth regulation, 31(2), 195-206. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-011-9231-y
  35. Son, K.-H., Ide, M., & Goto, E. (2020). Growth characteristics and phytochemicals of canola (Brassica napus) grown under UV radiation and low root zone temperature in a controlled environment. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 61(2), 267-277. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00219-4
  36. Sonkurt, M. (2018). Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Edici Bakteri (Pgpb) Uygulamalarının Ekmeklik ve Makarnalık Buğdayda Gelişme, Verim ve Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. (Master’s thesis) Siirt University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Siirt, Türkiye.
  37. Subramanian, P., & Gurunathan, J. (2020). Differential Production of Pigments by Halophilic Bacteria Under the Effect of Salt and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant Activity. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 190(2), 391-409. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03107-w
  38. Waśkiewicz, A., Muzolf-Panek, M., & Goliński, P. (2012). Phenolic content changes in plants under salt stress. In Ecophysiology and responses of plants under salt stress (pp. 283-314). Springer.
  39. Yang, X., Zhang, G., Ding, H., Ci, D., Dai, L., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Influence of salt stress on the rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure and growth performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Microbiology, 23(3), 453-465. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-020-00118-0
  40. Yang, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, H., Wen, S., Zhang, G., Qin, F., & Dai, L. (2022). Comprehensive effects of salt stress and peanut cultivars on the rhizosphere bacterial community diversity of peanut. Archives of Microbiology, 204(1), 15. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02619-6
  41. Yılmaz, A., & Çiftçi, V. (2021). Pütresin’in tuz stresi altında yetişen yer fıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.)’na etkisi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (31), 562-567. http://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1013051
  42. Yılmaz, M., Şahin, C. B., Yıldız, D., Demir, G., Yıldız, R., & İşler, N. (2022). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea) üretiminin genel durumu, önemli sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 2(1), 8-17.
  43. Yu, X., Li, Y., Long, C., & Han, L. (2022). Alleviation of salt stress and promotion of growth in peanut by Tsukamurella tyrosinosolvens and Burkholderia pyrrocinia. Biologia, 77(9), 2423-2433. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01073-z
  44. Ali, B., Wang, X., Saleem, M. H., Sumaira, Hafeez, A., Afridi, M. S., Khan, S., Zaib Un, N., Ullah, I., Amaral Junior, A. T. D., Alatawi, A., Ali, S.,. (2022). PGPR-Mediated Salt Tolerance in Maize by Modulating Plant Physiology, Antioxidant Defense, Compatible Solutes Accumulation and Bio-Surfactant Producing Genes. Plants 11(3), 345. http://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030345
  45. Huang, A. C., Jiang, T., Liu, Y. X., Bai, Y. C., Reed, J., Qu, B., Goossens, A., Nutzmann, H. W., Bai, Y., Osbourn, A.,. (2019). A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science, 364(6440), eaau6389. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6389
  46. Jiang, H., Qi, P., Wang, T., Chi, X., Wang, M., Chen, M., Chen, N., Pan, L.,. (2019). Role of halotolerant phosphate‐solubilising bacteria on growth promotion of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) under saline soil. Annals of Applied Biology, 174(1), 20-30. http://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12473
  47. Kang, S.-M., Khan, A. L., Waqas, M., You, Y.-H., Kim, J.-H., Kim, J.-G., Hamayun, M., Lee, I.-J.,. (2014). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria reduce adverse effects of salinity and osmotic stress by regulating phytohormones and antioxidants in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 673-682. http://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.894587
  48. Safdar, H., Amin, A., Shafiq, Y., Ali, A., Yasin, R., Shoukat, A., Hussan, M. U., Sarwar, M. I.,. (2019). A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Nature and Science, 17(1), 34-40.