Dergiler / Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) for Children Aged 4 to 8: Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study

Nimet Haşıl Korkmaz(ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7648-3289
Fatma Demir Zengin(T.C. MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI)0000-0002-6484-7329
Selen Uğur Mutlu(ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3052-9066
Pınar Bağçeli Kahraman(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, TEMEL EĞİTİM BÖLÜMÜ, OKUL ÖNCESİ EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-0551-7741
Sayfa
283–301
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, it is expected that it will contribute to upcoming research and applications in the area of early childhood education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study examined the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Physical Literacy Questionnaire for Children (PL-C Quest), developed by Barnett and colleagues (2020) for children aged 4 - 8.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample consisted of 375 students from kindergartens and elementary schools in Kocaeli.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, it is expected that it will contribute to upcoming research and applications in the area of early childhood education.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Physical literacy · Physical development · Movement training

Abstract

The study examined the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Physical Literacy Questionnaire for Children (PL-C Quest), developed by Barnett and colleagues (2020) for children aged 4 - 8. The sample consisted of 375 students from kindergartens and elementary schools in Kocaeli. The value for internal consistency was found to be 0.95 for the physical domain, 0.73 for the social domain, 0.75 for the cognitive domain, 0.78 for the psychological domain, and 0.89 for the total scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a structure consisting of 24 items - 4 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) subsequently validated the theoretical structure, resulting in a 21-item form after the removal of three items. Both versions demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. These results indicate that the Turkish PL-C Quest is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing the physical literacy levels of children aged 4 - 8 years. Furthermore, it is expected that it will contribute to upcoming research and applications in the area of early childhood education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Korkmaz, N. H., Zengin, F. D., Mutlu, S. U., Kahraman, P. B. (2026). Physical Literacy in Children Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) for Children Aged 4 to 8: Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.1825458

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (46)

  1. Albright, J. J., & Park, H. M. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS, LISREL, Mplus, and SAS/STAT CALIS. Technical Working Paper, Indiana University.
  2. Barnett, L. M., Mazzoli, E., Hawkins, M., Lander, N., Lubans, D. R., Caldwell, S., Comis, P., Keegan, R. J., Cairney, J., Dudley, D., Stewart, R. L., Long, G., Schranz, N., Brown, T. D., & Salmon, J. (2020). Development of a self-report scale to assess children’s perceived physical literacy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(1), 91–116. [CrossRef]
  3. Bánfai-Csonka, H., Bánfai, B., Jeges, S., & Betlehem, J. (2022). Understanding health literacy among university health science students of different nationalities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), Article 11758. [CrossRef]
  4. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. [CrossRef]
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Manual of data analysis for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation] (31st ed.). Pegem Akademi.
  6. Caldwell, H. A. T., Miller, M. B., Tweedie, C., Zahavich, J. B. L., Cockett, E., & Rehman, L. (2022). The impact of an after-school physical activity program on children’s physical activity and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods evaluation study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), Article 5640. [CrossRef]
  7. Carl, J., Barratt, J., Wanner, P., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., & Pfeifer, K. (2022). The effectiveness of physical literacy interventions: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 52(12), 2965–2999. [CrossRef]
  8. Clayton, M. F., & Pett, M. A. (2008). AMOS versus LISREL. Nursing Research, 57(4), 283–292. [CrossRef]
  9. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Pegem Akademi.
  10. Çolak, H. (2019). The impact of daily habits on the physical activity levels of children aged 7–10: An investigation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 118–125. [CrossRef]
  11. Dimitri, P., Joshi, K., & Jones, N. (2020). Moving more: physical activity and its positive effects on long term conditions in children and young people. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 105(11), 1035–1040. [CrossRef]
  12. Durden-Myers, E. J. (2024). Advancing physical literacy research in children. Children, 11(6), Article 702. [CrossRef]
  13. Erdem, C., & Eğmir, E. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programı okuryazarlığı düzeyleri [Teacher candidates’ curriculum literacy levels]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 123–138. [CrossRef]
  14. Ferrer, E., Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. J. (2004). Modeling latent growth curves with incomplete data using different types of structural equation modeling and multilevel software. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 452–483. [CrossRef]
  15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [CrossRef]
  16. Foulkes, J. D., Foweather, L., Fairclough, S. J., & Knowles, Z. (2020). “I wasn’t sure what it meant to be honest”—Formative research towards a physical literacy intervention for preschoolers. Children, 7(7), Article 76. [CrossRef]
  17. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
  18. Gerger, G., & Ünlü, H. (2023). Investigation of high school students’ physical activity levels and physical literacy and E-Health Literacy: Descriptive research. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(3), 441–452. [CrossRef]
  19. Giblin, S., Collins, D., & Button, C. (2014). Physical literacy: Importance, assessment and future directions. Sports Medicine, 44(9), 1177–1184. [CrossRef]
  20. Hallal, P. C. (2014). Physical activity and health in Brazil: Research, surveillance and policies. Cadernos De Saúde Pública, 30(12), 2487–2489. [CrossRef]
  21. Jefferies, P., Ungar, M., Aubertin, P., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical literacy and resilience in children and youth. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 346. [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y., & Chen, S. (2020). Physical literacy in children and adolescents: Definitions, assessments, and interventions. European Physical Education Review, 27(1), 96–112. [CrossRef]
  23. Lundvall, S. (2015). Physical literacy in the field of physical education – A challenge and a possibility. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 113–118. [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, Q., Zhang, P., Liu, Y., Ma, X., & Jennings, G. (2022). Intervention of physical activity for university students with anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), Article 15338. [CrossRef]
  25. Orhan, R. (2019). Çocuk gelişiminde fiziksel aktivite ve sporun önemi [The importance of physical activity and sport in child development]. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 157–176.
  26. Özdoğru, A. A. (2018). Çocuk ve ergenlerin okul dışı zamanlarda spor aktivitelerine katılımı [Participation of children and adolescents in sports activities during out-of-school time]. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 86–101. [CrossRef]
  27. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  28. Pekğöz Çeviker, A., & Ayhan, Z. (2023). İlkokul beden eğitimi ve oyun dersinde öğrencilerin fiziksel okuryazarlığının refah politikalarına etkisi [The effect of students' physical literacy on welfare policies in primary school physical education and games course]. Journal of History School, 66, 2779–2792. [CrossRef]
  29. Pot, N., & Van Hilvoorde, I. (2013). Generalizing the effects of school sports: comparing the cultural contexts of school sports in the Netherlands and the USA. Sport in Society, 16(9), 1164–1175. [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Davids, K. (2018). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: Embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162–175. [CrossRef]
  31. Robinson, D. B., Randall, L., & Barrett, J. (2018). Physical literacy (mis)understandings: What do leading physical education teachers know about physical literacy? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 288–298. [CrossRef]
  32. Sevimli-Celik, S., Kirazcı, S., & İnce, M. L. (2011). Preschool movement education in Turkey: Perceptions of preschool administrators and parents. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(5), 323–333. [CrossRef]
  33. Shearer, C., Goss, H. R., Boddy, L. M., Knowles, Z. R., Durden-Myers, E. J., & Foweather, L. (2021). Assessments related to the physical, affective and cognitive domains of physical literacy amongst children aged 7–11.9 years: A systematic review. Sports Medicine - Open, 7(1), Article 37. [CrossRef]
  34. Strong, W. B., Malina, R. M., Blimkie, C. J., Daniels, S. R., Dishman, R. K., Gutin, B., Hergenroeder, A. C., Must, A., Nixon, P. A., Pivarnik, J. M., Rowland, T., Trost, S., & Trudeau, F. (2005). Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. The Journal of Pediatrics, 146(6), 732–737. [CrossRef]
  35. Suntoda, A., Anira, A., Nugroho, W. A., & Wibowo, R. (2021). Physical literacy assessment of elementary school children in Indonesian urban areas. TEGAR Journal of Teaching Physical Education in Elementary School, 5(1), 76–83. [CrossRef]
  36. Şahin, M. G., & Öztürk, N. B. (2018). Eğitim alanında ölçek geliştirme süreci: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Scale development process in the field of education: A content analysis study]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 191–207. [CrossRef]
  37. Telama, R., Yang, X., Viikari, J., Välimäki, I., Wanne, O., & Raitakari, O. (2005). Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: A 21-year tracking study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(3), 267–273. [CrossRef]
  38. Tremblay, M. S., Costas-Bradstreet, C., Barnes, J. D., Bartlett, B., Dampier, D., Lalonde, C., Leidl, R., Longmuir, P., McKee, M., Patton, R., Way, R., & Yessis, J. (2018). Canada's physical literacy consensus statement: Process and outcome. BMC Public Health, 18(Suppl. 2), Article 1034. [CrossRef]
  39. Vainauskas, T., Dilys, L., Šukys, S., Miežienė, B., Emeljanovas, A., Karanauskienė, D., & Česnaitienė, V. J. (2020). Relationship between primary school children’s physical fitness, physical activity and their parents’ physical activity. Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 2(117), 4-10. [CrossRef]
  40. Whitehead, M. (2007). Physical literacy: The concept and its importance. In T. D. J. Earle (Ed.), Physical activity in children and adolescents: An evidence-based approach (pp. 51–58). Routledge.
  41. Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Routledge.
  42. Whitehead, M. (2013). Physical literacy: A way of life for children and young people. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(8), 14–19.
  43. World Health Organization. (2018). World health statistics 2018: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/272596
  44. Wright, P. M., & Stork, S. (2013). Recommended practices for promoting physical activity in early childhood education settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(5), 40–43. [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, C., Quan, M., Zhang, H., Zhou, C., & Chen, P. (2018). Impact of parents’ physical activity on preschool children’s physical activity: A cross-sectional study. PeerJ, 6, Article e4405. [CrossRef]
  46. Yetgin, M. (2020). Büyük ve küçük şehirlerde yaşayan ilkokul öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite ve beslenme davranışlarının karşılaştırılması [Comparison of physical activity and nutrition behaviors of primary school students living in large and small cities]. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(2), 114–125. [CrossRef]