KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 22 Issue: 1

Determination of Genotype, Housing System and Age Effect on Egg Production and Quality Traits of Layers

Bilgehan Yılmaz Dikmen(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, ZOOTECHNICS PR.)0000-0002-4397-5428
Merve Gündüz(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, ZOOTECHNICS PR.)0000-0002-5449-9893
Ahmet Kaşif(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, ZOOTECHNICS PR.)0000-0002-2629-0240
Beytullah Faruk Sevinç(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, ZOOTECHNICS PR.)0009-0008-3591-0465
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study could help breeders look for commercial genotypes for rearing in different housing systems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to determine the effects of housing systems (free system-FR, conventional cage-CC and enriched cage-EC) on the egg production and quality traits of layer genotypes (Lohmann Sandy-LS, Lohmann White-LW and Lohmann Brown-LB) at 35, 45, 55 and 65 weeks of age.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 180 layers were used for egg production traits.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study could help breeders look for commercial genotypes for rearing in different housing systems.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:genotype · layer · system

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of housing systems (free system-FR, conventional cage-CC and enriched cage-EC) on the egg production and quality traits of layer genotypes (Lohmann Sandy-LS, Lohmann White-LW and Lohmann Brown-LB) at 35, 45, 55 and 65 weeks of age. A total of 180 layers were used for egg production traits. A total of 45 eggs were analyzed for egg quality traits at each age period. The highest feed intake was in FR-reared LS layers at 35 wk of age (P=0.000). The lowest yolk index was in CC, and FR-reared LW layers at 65 wk of age (P=0.042). The lowest haugh unit was in EC-reared LB layers at 65 wk of age (P=0.041). The highest yolk color was in CC-reared LB layers and EC-reared LS and LB layers at 45 wk of age (P=0.009). It can be concluded that feed intake of layers, yolk index, haugh unit and yolk color of eggs are affected by the age and genotype of layers reared in different housing systems. The production and egg quality traits are affected by the age of layers. The genotype of layers influences the production and egg quality traits, excluding egg weight and yolk index. The housing system affected feed intake of layers and some egg quality parameters, except for yolk and shell weight, shell ratio, shell thickness, shape index and yolk color. The study could help breeders look for commercial genotypes for rearing in different housing systems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dikmen, B. Y., Gündüz, M., Kaşif, A., Sevinç, B. F. (2025). Determination of Genotype, Housing System and Age Effect on Egg Production and Quality Traits of Layers. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, Volume: 22 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1683955

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (41)

  1. Abebe, F., Mulatu, H. and Kelemework, S. (2023). Review of factors affecting egg quality and its effect. Journal of Animal Health, 3(2), 17-32. https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JAH/article/view/2224
  2. Ahammed, M., Chae, B. J., Lohakare, J., Keohavong, B., Lee, M.H., Lee, S.J., Kim, D.M., Lee, JY., Ohh, S.J. (2014). Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27, 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13394.
  3. Alig, B.N., Malheiros, R.D. and Anderson, K.E. (2023). Evaluation of physical egg quality parameters of commercial brown laying hens housed in five production systems. Animals, 13, 716. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani13040716
  4. Alkan, S. (2023). Determination of egg quality traits in Lohmann Sandy hens raised in free range system. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 12(2), 271-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.29278/azd.1264872
  5. Aygün, A., Narinç, D. (2024). Effects of rooster presence in free-range systems on egg performance, egg quality and fear response. Poultry Studies, 21(2), 34-42. http://doi.org/10.34233/jpr.1593986
  6. Aygün, A., Narinç, D. and Arısoy, H. (2025). Comparison of performance, egg quality, and egg cost of different laying genotypes in free-range system from 21 to 44 weeks of age. Animals, 15(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15010086
  7. Castellini, C., Mugnai, C., Moscati, L., Mattioli, S., Guarino Amato, M., Mancinelli, A.C., Dal Bosco, A. (2016). Adaptation to organic rearing system of eight different chicken genotypes: behaviour, welfare and performance. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(1), 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2015.1131893
  8. EU Commission. (2021). Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets. EU market situation for eggs. Brussels.
  9. Erek, M., Matur, E. (2024). Effects of housing systems on production performance, egg quality, tonic immobility and feather score in laying hens. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10, e70112. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70112
  10. Hisasaga, C., Griffin, S.E., Tarrant, K.J. (2020). Survey of egg quality in commercially available table eggs. Poultry Science, 99, 7202-7206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.049
  11. Johnston, S.A., Gous, R.M. (2007). Modelling the changes in the proportion of the egg components during a laying cycle. British Poultry Science, 48, 347-353.
  12. Lay, Jr. D. C., Fulton, R.M., Hester, P.Y., Karcher, D.M., Kjaer, J.B., Mench, J.A., Mullens, B.A., Newberry, R.C., Nicol, C.J., O’Sullivan, N.P., Porter, R.E. (2011). Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Science, 90, 278-294. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00962
  13. Ledvinka, Z., Zita, L. and Klesalová, L. (2012). Egg quality and some factors influencing it: A review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 43(1), 46-52.
  14. Leyendecker, M., Hamann, H., Hartung, J., Kamphues, J., Ring, C., Glünder, G., Ahlers, C., Sander, I., Neuman, U., Distl, O. (2001). Analysis of genotype environment interactions between layer lines and housing systems for performance traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength: 1st communication: performance traits. Zuchtungskunde, 73(4), 290-307.
  15. Majewski, E., Potori, N., Sulewski, P., Was, A., Mórawska, M., Gebska, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Grontkowska, A., Szili, V., Erdos, A. (2024). End of the cage age? A study on the impacts of the transition from cages on the EU laying hen sector. Agriculture, 14(1), 111. https:// doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14010111
  16. Neijat, M., House, J.D., Guenter, W. and Kebreab, E. (2011). Production performance and nitrogen flow of Shaver White layers housed in enriched or conventional cage systems. Poultry Science, 90, 543-554. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01069
  17. NRC. (1994). National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academic Press.
  18. Onbaşılar, E.E., Unal, N., Erdem, E., Kocakaya, A., Yaranoglu, B. (2015). Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science, 94(4), 559-564. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev009
  19. Philippe, F. X., Mahmoudi, Y., Cinq-Mars, D., Lefrançois, M., Moula, N., Palacios, J., Godbout, S. (2020). Comparison of egg production, quality and composition in three production systems for laying hens. Livestock Science, 232, 103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103917
  20. Rakonjac, S., Dosković, V., Bošković, S.B., Škrbić, Z., Lukić, M., Petričević, V., Petrović, D.M. (2021). Production performance and egg quality of laying hens as influenced by genotype and rearing system. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 23(2), 001-008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1045
  21. Rodenburg, T.B., Giersberg, M.F., Petersan, P., Shields, S. (2022). Freeing the hens: Workshop outcomes for applying ethology to the development of cage-free housing systems in the commercial egg industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 251, 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105629.
  22. Riczu, C.M., Saunders Blades, J.L., Yngvesson, A.K., Robinson, F.E., Korver, D.R. (2004). End of cycle bone quality in white and brown egg laying hens. Poultry Science, 83, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.375.
  23. Rizzi C, Chiericato, G.M. (2005). Organic farming production, effect of age on the productive yield and egg quality of hens of two commercial hybrid lines and two local breeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 4, 160-162. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.3s.160
  24. Samiullah, S., Roberts, J.R. and Chousalkar, K.K. (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00805
  25. Scott, T.A., Silversides, F.G. (2000). The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poultry Science, 79, 1725-1729. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1725
  26. Silversides, F.G., Twizeyimana, F. and Villeneue, P. (1993). Research note: A study relating to the validity of the haugh unit correction for egg weight in fresh eggs. Poultry Science, 72, 760-764. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720760
  27. Singh, R., Cheng, K.M. and Silversides, F.G. (2009). Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poultry Science, 88, 256-264. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00237
  28. Sokołowicz, Z., Krawczyk, J. and Dykiel, M. (2018). The effect of the type of alternative housing system, genotype and age of laying hens on egg quality. Annals of Animal Science, 18(2), 541-555. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0004
  29. Stojčić, M.D., Perić, L., Milošević, N., Rodić, V., Glamočić, D., Škrbić, Z., Lukić, M. (2012). Effect of genotype and housing system on egg production, egg quality and welfare of laying hens. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 10, 556-559.
  30. Suk, Y.O., Park, C. (2001). Effect of breed and age of hens on the yolk to albumen ratio in two different genetic stocks. Poultry Science, 80, 855-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.855.
  31. Şekeroğlu, A., Sarıca, M., Demir, E., Ulutaş, A.Z., Tilki, M., Saatçi, M., Omed, H. (2010). Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(12), 1739-1744. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1739.1744
  32. Şekeroğlu, A., Duman, M., Tahtalı, Y., Yıldırım, A., Eleroğlu, H. (2014). Effect of cage tier and age on performance, egg quality and stress parameters of laying hens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 44 (3), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i3.11
  33. Tainika, B., Şekeroğlu, A., Akyol, A., Şentürk, Y.E., Abacı, S.H., Duman, M. (2024). Effects of age, housing environment, and strain on physical egg quality parameters of laying hens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 26(3), 001-014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2024-1911
  34. Tutkun, M., Denli, M. and Demirel, R. (2018). Productivity and egg quality of two commercial layer hybrids kept in free-range system. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 6(10), 1444-1447. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i10.1444-1447.2070
  35. Tůmová, E., Uhlířová, L., Tůma, R., Chodová, D., Máchal, L. (2017). Age related changes in laying pattern and egg weight of different laying hen genotypes. Animal Reproduction Science, 183, 21-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.06.006
  36. Van Den Brand, H., Parmentier, H.K. and Kemp, B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs. cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. British Poultry Science, 45, 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400014283
  37. Yakubu, A., Salako, A.E. and Ige, A.O. (2007). Effects of genotype and housing system on the laying performance of chickens in different seasons in the semi-humid tropics. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(6), 434-439. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.434.439
  38. Yannakopoulos, A.L., Tserveni Gousi, A.S. and Nikokyris, P. (1994). Egg composition as influenced by time of oviposition, egg weight, and age of hens. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 58, 206-213.
  39. Yılmaz Dikmen, B., İpek, A., Şahan, Ü., Petek, M., Sözcü, A. (2016). Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Science, 95, 1564-1572. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew082
  40. Yılmaz Dikmen, B., İpek, A., Şahan, Ü., Sözcü, A., Baycan, S.C. (2017). Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 41(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1604-71
  41. Zemková, L., Simeonovová, J., Lichovníková, M. and Somerlíková, K. (2007). The effects of housing systems and age of hens on the weight and cholesterol concentration of the egg. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 52(4), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.17221/2269-CJAS