Dergiler / Review of Armenian Studies / 2026 / Issue: 54

Sınırötesi Krizlerin Bölgesel Yansımaları: Ermenistan Perspektifinden İran Krizinin Jeopolitik ve Güvenlik Analizi

Regional Repercussions of Transboundary Crises: A Geopolitical and Security Analysis of the Iran Crisis from the Perspective of Armenia

Gül Seda Acet İnce(Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi)0000-0003-3329-7480
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-10
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen bulgular, müdahale öncesinde İran’ın Ermenistan için kritik bir dengeleyici rol üstlendiğini; ancak söz konusu müdahalenin bu rolü zayıflattığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Güney Kafkasya’da yer alan Ermenistan’ın Orta Doğu’da meydana gelen geniş ölçekli bir çatışmadan nasıl etkilendiğini ve bu süreçte ulusal güvenlik stratejilerini nasıl yeniden şekillendirdiğini analiz etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:İran’da yaşanan askeri gelişmeler, bölgesel güç dengesinde önemli bir kırılmaya yol açmış ve Ermenistan’ın geleneksel güvenlik anlayışının yeniden değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen bulgular, müdahale öncesinde İran’ın Ermenistan için kritik bir dengeleyici rol üstlendiğini; ancak söz konusu müdahalenin bu rolü zayıflattığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:South Caucasus · Regional security complex theory · Armenia

Özet

Bu çalışma, Güney Kafkasya’da yer alan Ermenistan’ın Orta Doğu’da meydana gelen geniş ölçekli bir çatışmadan nasıl etkilendiğini ve bu süreçte ulusal güvenlik stratejilerini nasıl yeniden şekillendirdiğini analiz etmektedir. İran’da yaşanan askeri gelişmeler, bölgesel güç dengesinde önemli bir kırılmaya yol açmış ve Ermenistan’ın geleneksel güvenlik anlayışının yeniden değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmıştır. Çalışma, teorik olarak Bölgesel Güvenlik Kompleksi Teorisi ile küçük devlet literatürünü birleştirerek, hem bölgesel güvenlik dinamiklerinin yapısal sınırlarını hem de kapasite asimetrisine sahip aktörlerin stratejik tercihlerini açıklamaktadır. Nitel araştırma yöntemine dayanan bu çalışma, teorik genelleme yapmaya imkân tanıyan kritik bir örnek incelemesi ile yürütülmüş ve veri toplama sürecinde doküman analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, müdahale öncesinde İran’ın Ermenistan için kritik bir dengeleyici rol üstlendiğini; ancak söz konusu müdahalenin bu rolü zayıflattığını göstermektedir. Bu olgu, Erivan yönetimini Batılı ve bölge dışı aktörlerle yeni güvenlik ilişkileri kurmaya yöneltmiş; aynı zamanda mevcut tehdit kaynaklarıyla daha esnek ve pragmatik stratejiler geliştirmesine neden olmuştur. Sonuç olarak çalışma, bölgesel bir çatışmanın, komşu güvenlik komplekslerinde yer alan devletlerin güvenlik algılarını ve dış politika yönelimlerini dönüştürme kapasitesini ortaya koyarak literatüre katkı sunmaktadır.

Abstract

This study evaluates how Armenia, located in the South Caucasus, was influenced by a large-scale conflict in the Middle East and how it reshaped national security strategies in the process. Military developments in Iran have led to a significant shift in the regional balance of power and necessitated a re-evaluation of Armenia’s traditional security approach. The study theoretically assembles Regional Security Complex Theory with small states literature, elucidating both the structural boundaries of regional security dynamics and the strategic preferences of actors with capacity asymmetry. On the basis of qualitative research method, the study employs a single-case study design and uses document analysis as its primary data collection method. The findings demonstrate that Iran played a critical balancing role for Armenia prior to the intervention; nevertheless, the intervention weakened this role. This casus has led the Armenian government to establish novel security associations with Western and non-regional actors and has also led it to develop more flexible and pragmatic strategies with current threat sources. Consequently, the study contributes to the literature by presenting the capacity of a regional conflict to transform the security apprehensions and foreign policy orientations of states in neighboring security complexes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İnce, G. S. A. (2026). Sınırötesi Krizlerin Bölgesel Yansımaları: Ermenistan Perspektifinden İran Krizinin Jeopolitik ve Güvenlik Analizi. Review of Armenian Studies, Issue: 54. https://doi.org/10.54842/ras.1917725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (36)

  1. Aktaş, Alperen. “Armenia, US Launch ‘Eagle Partner-2025’ Joint Military Drills.” Anadolu Agency, July 12, 2025. Accessed March 21. https://www. aa.com.tr/en/world/armenia-us-launch-eagle-partner-2025-joint-military drills/3657553
  2. Alizada, Nazrin. “Iran and the South Caucasus: The 44Day Karabakh War in the Changing Geopolitical Equation.” Review of Armenian Studies, no. 50 (2024): 141–162.
  3. Altınsoy, Zeynep Deniz “Legal Assessment of Allegations of Armenia’s Child Soldier Use in Second Karabakh War.” Review of Armenian Studies, no. 52 (2025): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.54842/ras.1786951
  4. Amable, Dennis Senam. “Theorizing the Emergence of Security Regions: An Adaptation for the Regional Security Complex Theory.” Global Studies Quarterly 2 (2022): 1–10.
  5. Banka, Andris. “Tehlikeli Müttefikler mi? Küçük Devletler ve Büyük Güçlerin Tuzağa Düşme Riskleri.” Avrupa Uluslararası Güvenlik Dergisi (2025): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2025.16
  6. Broers, Laurence. Armenia and Azerbaijan: Anatomy of a Rivalry. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.
  7. Bruchmann, Sascha, and Martin Sampson. “The USIsrael Campaign in Iran.” International Institute for Strategic Studies, Online Analysis, (February 2026, Accessed March 19, 2026. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/ online-analysis/2026/02/the-us-israel-campaign-in-iran/
  8. Bukhari, Syed Rizwan Haider. “From Negotiation to Escalation: Coercive Diplomacy, Military Force, and the 2026 Iran–US Nuclear Conflict.” Journal of Development and Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (2026): 304–315. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2026(7-I)25
  9. Burke, Jason. “Middle East War Could Be Decided by Who Runs Out of Missiles or Interceptors First, Analysts Say.” The Guardian, March 3, 2026. Accessed March 19, 2026. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/ mar/03/middle-east-war-decided-interceptors-missiles
  10. Burrows, Emma, and Stephanie Liechtenstein. “Israeli Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Program Are Sweeping but Can They Decimate It?” Associated Press, June 14, 2025. Accessed March 19, 2026.https://apnews.com/ article/iran-israel-nuclear-attack-uranium-enrichment-radiation-5ded3c22 4531adf510668c5860801882
  11. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  12. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998. Chechelashvili, Valeri, Temur Kekelidze, and Nodar Kharshiladze. Challenges to Russia’s Influence in the South Caucasus. New Eurasian Strategies Centre, 2025. Accessed March 18, 2026. https://nestcentre.org/wp-content/ uploads/2025/08/NEST-Centre-Challenges-to-Russias-influence-in-the South-Caucasus-1.pdf
  13. Chedia, Anri R. “Zangezur Corridor: Economic Potential and Political Constraints.” Russia in Global Affairs 22, no. 1 (2024): 194–216. https:// doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2024-22-1-194-216 Collective Security Treaty Organization. The Republic of Armenia. Accessed March 21, 2026. https://en.odkb-csto.org/countries/armeniya/#loaded
  14. Council of the European Union. “Armenia: EU Establishes a Civilian Mission to Contribute to Stability in Border Areas.” Consilium – European Union, January 23, 2023. Accessed March 21,2026. https://www.consilium. europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/01/23/armenia-eu-sets-up-a civilian-mission-to-ensure-security-in-conflict-affected-and-border-areas/
  15. De Waal, Thomas. The Caucasus: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  16. Demir, Yeşim. “İran’ın Güney Kafkasya Politikası.” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 22, no. 2 (2022): 573–88. European Security & Defence. “Diversifying Armenia’s Defence: Shifting Alliances and Military Modernisation.” May 20, 2025. Accessed March 21, 2026.https://euro-sd.com/2025/05/articles/44516/diversifying-armenias defence-shifting-alliances-and-military-modernisation/?
  17. Giragosian, Richard. “Armenia as a Bridge to Iran? Russia Won’t Like It.” Al Jazeera, August 30, 2015. Accessed September 6, 2026, https://www. aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/8/30/armenia-as-a-bridge-to-iran-russia wont-like-it/
  18. Giragosian, Richard. “Armenia’s Strategic Reorientation.” Geopolitics 6 (2024). Accessed March 20, 2026. https://politicsgeo.com/wp-content/ uploads/2025/08/Richard-Giragosian-Armenias-Strategic-Reorientation. pdf
  19. Güler, Burak. “İran’ın Füze Gücü: Teknolojik Yetkinlikler, Sınırlar ve Bölgesel Denge – III.” Time of Defence, 2026. Accessed March 19, 2026. https:// www.timesofdefence.com.tr/iranin-fuze-gucu-teknolojik-yetkinlikler sinirlar-ve-bolgesel-denge-iii/
  20. Ibekwe, Emmanuel Ogueri, and Uzoma D. Nosiri. “Counter Terrorism: An Assessment of Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) in Combating Boko Haram Insurgency in the Lake Chad Region.” African Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences (AJSBS) 13, no. 2 (2023): 526–542.
  21. Idahosa, S. O., E. M. Savicheva, S. I. Ikhidero, and K. M. Adebayo. “Regional Security Complex and Threat Dynamics of the Sahelian States.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 23, no. 1 (2023): 67–87. Ingebritsen, Christine, Iver B. Neumann, Sieglinde Gstöhl, and Jessica Beyer. Small States in International Relations. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006.
  22. International Energy Agency (IEA). Armenia 2022 Energy Policy Review. Paris: IEA/OECD Publishing, 2022. Accessed March 20, 2026. https://iea. blob.core.windows.net/assets/8328cc7c-e65e-4df1-a96f-514fdd0ac31e/ Armenia2022EnergyPolicyReview.pdf
  23. International Energy Agency (IEA). Armenia Energy Profile. Paris: IEA, 2023, Accessed September 6, 2026, https://www.iea.org/reports/armenia energy-profile
  24. International Monetary Fund, “Republic of Armenia: First Review under the Stand-By Arrangement, Request for Modification of Performance Criteria and Monetary Policy Consultation Clause—Press Release; and Staff Report”, IMF Staff Country Reports 2026, no. 132 (June 10, 2026), Accessed September 7, 2026 https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229049955.002
  25. Ismailov, Eldar, and Vladimer Papava. The Central Caucasus: Essays on Geopolitical Economy. Stockholm: CA&CC Press, 2014
  26. Jensen, Benjamin. “Operational Art in the Age of Battle Networks.” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), September, 16 2025. Accessed September 5, 2026 https://www.csis.org/analysis/chapter-4-operational art-age-battle-networks
  27. Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30, no. 2 (1978): 167–214, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958
  28. Jervis, Robert. “Deterrence Theory Revisited.” World Politics 31, no. 2 (1979): 289–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009945
  29. Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.
  30. Kaleji, Vali. “Strategic Rail Connectivity: Time to Reconnect Iran and the South Caucasus.” Baku Dialogues: Policy Perspectives on the Silk Road Region 6, no. 1 (2022): 102–22.
  31. Kaleji, Vali. “The Complex Web of Interdependence and Threat Balancing That Prevents War Between Iran and Azerbaijan,” Middle East Institute, 4 April 2023, Accessed September 6, 2026 https://mei.edu/publication/ complex-web-interdependence-and-threat-balancing-prevents-war between-iran-and/
  32. Kassimeris, Christos. “The Foreign Policy of Small Powers.” International Politics 46, no. 1 (2009): 84–101.
  33. Kelbizadeh, Elnur H. “The Dynamics of the Development of ArmenianIranian Relations in the PostSoviet Period.” History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus 15, no. 4 (2019): 639–651. https://doi.org/10.32653/ CH154639-651
  34. Kelly, Robert E. “Security Theory in the ‘New Regionalism.’” International Studies Review 9 (2007): 197–229.
  35. Keohane, Robert O. “Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics.” International Organization 23, no. 2 (1969): 291–310. https://doi. org/10.1017/S002081830003160X
  36. Council of the European Union. “Armenia: EU Establishes a Civilian Mission to Contribute to Stability in Border Areas.” Consilium – European Union, January 23, 2023. Accessed March 21,2026. https://www.consilium. europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/01/23/armenia-eu-sets-up-a civilian-mission-to-ensure-security-in-conflict-affected-and-border-areas/