KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Mühendis ve Makina / 2026 / Cilt: 65 Sayı: 714

Farklı Ebatlarda Tasarlanan Polimer Elektrolit Membranlı Yakıt Hücresi (PEMYH) Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi

EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE FUEL CELL (PEMFC) DESIGNED IN DIFFERENT SIZES

Adem Yılmaz(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7266-0866
Sinan Ünvar(AGRI IBRAHIM CECEN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9144-7638
Bünyamin Aygün(AĞRI İBRAHİM ÇEÇEN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9384-1540
Sayfa
1101–120
Yayın Tarihi
2024-04-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu durumda; yüzey alanı 5 cm2 olan yakıt hücresinin C60H60’da, 25 cm2 olanın C60H46‘da ve 50 cm2 olanın C60H46’da en verimli olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Geleceğin teknolojisi olan yakıt hücreleri hidrojen ile oksijenin kimyasal reaksiyon sonucu birleşmesi ile elektrik enerjisinin meydana gelmesini ve atık olarak H2O ile ısı açığa çıkmasını sağlayan cihazlardır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmada farklı boyutlardaki (5-25-50 cm2) yakıt hücrelerinin yakıt sarfiyatı ile ilgili incelemeler yapılarak performansa etki eden faktörler deneysel olarak belirlenmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu durumda; yüzey alanı 5 cm2 olan yakıt hücresinin C60H60’da, 25 cm2 olanın C60H46‘da ve 50 cm2 olanın C60H46’da en verimli olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yakıt hücresi · mebran · polimer elektrolit

Özet

Geleceğin teknolojisi olan yakıt hücreleri hidrojen ile oksijenin kimyasal reaksiyon sonucu birleşmesi ile elektrik enerjisinin meydana gelmesini ve atık olarak H2O ile ısı açığa çıkmasını sağlayan cihazlardır. Yanma olmaksızın elektrik üretildiği için daha az kirlilik meydana gelmektedir. Polimer Elektrolit Membran (PEM) yakıt hücresindeki kimyasal reaksiyonun oluştuğu kısım membran zardan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada farklı boyutlardaki (5-25-50 cm2) yakıt hücrelerinin yakıt sarfiyatı ile ilgili incelemeler yapılarak performansa etki eden faktörler deneysel olarak belirlenmiştir. Öncelikli olarak PEM yakıt hücresi kurulumu yapılmış, kurulan hücrenin özelliklerine göre uygun miktarlarda Hidrojen (H2) ve Oksijen (O2) yakıt hücresine gönderilmiştir. Çalışma esnasında değişik boyutlardaki yakıt pillerinin performansları belirlenmiştir. Yakıt hücresindeki C-H oranı değerlerine göre yakıt hücresinin davranışı belirlenmiş ve üretilen akıma göre güç değerleri bulunmuştur. Boyutlarına göre yakıt hücrelerinin performansları değerlendirilerek üretecekleri elektrik enerji miktarları hesaplanmıştır. Bu durumda; yüzey alanı 5 cm2 olan yakıt hücresinin C60H60’da, 25 cm2 olanın C60H46‘da ve 50 cm2 olanın C60H46’da en verimli olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Abstract

Fuel cells, the technology of the future, are devices that create electrical energy by combining hydrogen and oxygen as a result of a chemical reaction and release heat with H2O as waste. Since electricity is produced without combustion, less pollution occurs. The part where the chemical reaction takes place in the Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) fuel cell consists of the membrane. In this study, the fuel consumption of different sizes (5-25-50 cm2) of fuel cells was investigated and the factors affecting the performance were determined experimentally. First of all, the PEM fuel cell was installed, and appropriate amounts of Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2) were sent to the fuel cell according to the characteristics of the established cell. During the study, the performances of different sizes of fuel cells were determined. The behavior of the fuel cell was determined according to the C-H ratio values in the fuel cell and power values were found according to the produced current. The performance of fuel cells was evaluated according to their size and the amount of electrical energy they would produce was calculated. In this case, it was determined that the fuel cell with a surface area of 5 cm2 was the most efficient in C60H60, 25 cm2 in C60H46 and 50 cm2 in C60H46, respectively

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yılmaz, A., Ünvar, S., Aygün, B. (2024). Farklı Ebatlarda Tasarlanan Polimer Elektrolit Membranlı Yakıt Hücresi (PEMYH) Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi. Mühendis ve Makina, Cilt: 65 Sayı: 714, 1101–120. https://doi.org/10.46399/muhendismakina.1358445

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (43)

  1. Aili, D., Henkensmeier, D., Martin, S., Singh, B., Hu, Y., Jensen, J.,. Qingfeng, L. (2020). Polybenzimidazole-based high-temperature polymer electrolytemembrane fuel cells: New insights and recent progress. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 3, 793–845. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-020-00080-5
  2. Bakonyi, P., Koók, L., Rózsenberszki, T., Tóth, G., Bélafi-Bakó, K. & Nemestóthy, N.(2020). Development and application of supported ionic liquid membranes in microbial fuel cell technology: A concise overview. Membranes, 10(16). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10010016
  3. Campanari, S., Manzolini, G. & García de la Iglesia, F. (2009). Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. Journal of Power Sources, 186, 464–477. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.115
  4. Cano, Z.P., Banham, D., Ye, S., Hintennach, A., Lu, J., Fowler, M. & Chen, Z. (2018). Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nature Energy, 3, 279–289. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1
  5. Carbone, A., Pedicini, R., Portale, G., Longo, A., D’Ilario, L. & Passalacqua, E. (2006). Sulphonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes for fuel cell application: Thermal and structural characterization. Journal of Power Sources, 163, 18– 26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.066
  6. Chae, K.J., Choi, M., Ajayi, F.F., Park, W., Chang, I.S.& Kim, I.S. (2008). Mass transport through a proton exchange membrane (Nafion) in microbial fuel cells. Energy Fuels, 22, 169–176. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700308u
  7. Cleghorn, S., Springer, T., Wilson, M., Zawodzinski, C., Zawodzinski, T.A. & Gottes-feld, S. (1997). PEM fuel cells for transportation and stationary power generation applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 22, 1137–1144. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00016-5
  8. Cruz-Martínez, H., Tellez-Cruz, M.M., Guerrero-Gutiérrez, O.X., Ramírez-Herrera, C.A., Salinas-Juárez, M.G., Velázquez-Osorio, A. & Solorza-Feria, O. (2019). Mexican contributions for the improvement of electrocatalytic properties for the oxygen reduction reaction in PEM fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 12477–12491. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.168
  9. Ebrahimi, M., Kujawski,W., Fatyeyeva, K. & Kujawa, J. A. (2021). Review on Ionic Liquids-Based Membranes for Middle and High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells (PEM FCs). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, 5430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115430
  10. Escorihuela, J., Olvera-Mancilla, J., Alexandrova, L., del Castillo, L. & Compañ, V. (2020). Recent progress in the development of composite membranes based on polybenzimidazole for high temperature proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell applications. Polymers, 12(9), 1861. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091861
  11. Esmaeili, N., Gray, E.M.A. & Webb, C.J. (2019). Non-fluorinated polymer composite proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications-A review. Chemphyschem: a European Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry, 20, 2016–2053. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201900191
  12. Haile, S.M., Boysen, D., Chisholm, C.R.I. & Merle, R. (2001). Solid acids as fuel cell electrolytes. Nature, 410, 910–913. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/35073536
  13. Hammes-Schiffer, S. & Soudackov, A. (2008). Protoncoupled electron transfer in solution, proteins, and electrochemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 112, 14108–14123. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp805876e
  14. Han, I., Park, S. & Chung, C. (2016). Modeling and operation optimization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell system for maximum efficiency. Energy Conversion and Management, 113, 52-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.045
  15. Huang, Y., Ding, H. & Zou Y. (2020). Ecological Performance Analysis of an Integrated Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell and Thermoelectric Devices. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2581-2593. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.03.31
  16. Ito, H., Maeda, T., Nakano, A. & Takenaka, H. (2011). Properties of Nafion membranes under PEM water electrolysis conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 10527–10540. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.127
  17. Kaliaguine, S., Mikhailenko, S.D., Wang, K., Xing, P., Robertson, G.P., & Guiver, M.D. (2003). Properties of SPEEK based PEMs for fuel cell application. Catalysis Today, 82, 213-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00235-9
  18. Kraytsberg, A. & Ein-Eli, Y. (2014). Review of advanced materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Fuels, 28, 7303–7330. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef501977k
  19. Kreuer, K.D., Paddison, S.J., Spohr, E. & Schuster, M. (2004). Transport in proton conductors for fuel-cell applications: Simulations, elementary reactions, and phenomenology. Chemical Reviews, 104, 4637–4678. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020715f
  20. Li, Q., Jensena, J., Savinell, R.F. & Bjerrum, N. (2009). High temperature proton exchange membranes based on polybenzimidazoles for fuel cells. Progress in Polymer Science, 34, 449–477. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.003
  21. Li, G., Kujawski, W. & Rynkowska, E. (2019). Advancements in proton exchange membranes for high-performance high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFC). Reviews in Chemical Engineering. https:// doi.org/10.1515/revce-2019-0079
  22. Liu, C., Khan, S., Lee, M., Kim, K., Akhtar, K. & Han, H. (2013). Fuel cell based on novel hyper-branched polybenzimidazole membrane. Macromolecular Research, 21, 35–41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-012-0191-2
  23. Mauritz, K.A. & Moore, R.B. (2004). State of understanding of Nafion. Chemical Reviews, 104, 4535–4585. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0207123
  24. Mogorosi, K., Oladiran, M.T. & Rakgati, E. (2020). Mathematical Modelling and Experimental Investigation of a Low Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. Energy and Power Engineering, 12, 653-670. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2020.1211039
  25. Mubin, A.N., Bahrom, M.H., Azri, M., Ibrahim, Z., Rahim, N.A. & Raihan, S.R. (2017). Analysis performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 210 012052. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/210/1/012052
  26. Nalbant, Y., Colpan, C.O. & Devrim, Y. (2020). Energy and exergy performance assessments of a high temperature-proton exchange membrane fuel cell based integrated cogeneration system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45, 3584-3594. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.252
  27. Omran, A., Lucchesi, A., Smith, D., Alaswad, A., Amiri, A., Wilberforce, T., … Olabi, A.G. (2021). Mathematical model of a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell. International Journal of Thermofluids. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2021.100110
  28. Özgür, T., & Yakaryilmaz, A.C. (2018). Thermodynamic analysis of a Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 18007-18013. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.152
  29. Parnian, M.J., Rowshanzamir, S., Prasad, A. & Advani, S.G. (2018). High durability sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)-ceria nanocomposite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 556, 12-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.083
  30. Pineri, M. & Eisenberg, A. (1987). Structure and Properties of Ionomers. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. ISBN-10: 9401082049, ISBN-13: 978-9401082044
  31. Samms, S.R., Wasmus, S. & Savinell, R.F. (1996). Thermal stability of nafion® in simulated fuel cell environments. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 143, 1498. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1836669
  32. Scott, K. & Shukla, A. (2004). Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Principles and advances. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 3, 273–280. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-004-6884-z
  33. Toghyani, S., Nafchi, F.M., Afshari, E., Hasanpour, K., Baniasadi, E. & Atyabi, S.A. (2018). Thermal and electrochemical performance analysis of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell under assembly pressure on gas diffusion layer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 4534-4545. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.068
  34. Vazifeshenas, Y., Sedighi, K. & Shakeri, M. (2016). Numerical investigation of a novel compound flow-field for PEMFC performance improvement. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(43), 15032–15039. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.077
  35. Vidakovic-Koch, T., Gonzalez Martinez, I., Kuwertz, R., Kunz, U., Turek, T. & Sundmacher, K. (2012). Electrochemical membrane reactors for sustainable chlorine recycling. Membranes, 2, 510–528. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes2030510
  36. Wang, Y., Chen, K.S., Mishler, J., Cho, S.C. & Adroher, X.C. (2011). A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Applied Energy, 88, 981–1007. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030
  37. Wang, L., Ni, J., Liu, D., Gong, C. & Wang, L. (2018). Effects of branching structures on the properties of phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole as a membrane material for high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 16694–16703. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.181
  38. Whittingham, M., Savinell, R. & Zawodzinski, T. (2004). Introduction: Batteries and fuel cells. Chemical Reviews, 104, 4243–4244. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020705e
  39. Wilberforce, T. & Olabi, A.G. (2020). Proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance prediction using artificial neural network. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 6037-6050. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.263
  40. The Model 850 Fuel Cell Test System. (2023). Erişim adresi: https://www.scribner.com/products/fuel-cell-test-systems/850-fuel-cell-test system/#1503940946730-2-374a5-f1ee
  41. Zhang, H. &Shen, P.K. (2012). Recent development of polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. Chemical Reviews, 112, 2780–2832. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200035s
  42. Zhang, H. & Sun, C. (2021). Cost-effective iron-based aqueous redox flow batteries for large-scale energy storage application: A review. Journal of Power Sources, 493, 229445. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22944
  43. Aili, D., Henkensmeier, D., Martin, S., Singh, B., Hu, Y., Jensen, J.,. Qingfeng, L. (2020). Polybenzimidazole-based high-temperature polymer electrolytemembrane fuel cells: New insights and recent progress. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 3, 793–845. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-020-00080-5