KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2020 / Volume: 33 Issue: 3

Comparison of the predictive utility of Revised Trauma Score, Emergency Trauma Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale-Age-Pressure scores for emergency department mortality in multiple trauma patients

Melis Efeoglu Sacak(Marmara University)0000-0002-8446-9898
Haldun Akoglu(Marmara University)0000-0002-1316-0308
Ozge Onur(Marmara University)0000-0002-0110-3533
Arzu Denızbası(Marmara University)0000-0002-4589-8251
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-10-23
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: In this study, all trauma scores performed similar in the ED for the prediction of ED mortality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the utility of Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure (GAP) scores, and Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS) in multiple trauma patients for the prediction of mortality in the emergency department (ED).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: In this observational diagnostic accuracy study, a consecutive convenience sample of all adult patients (older than 16 years) with multiple trauma (injuries confined to at least two body regions) admitted to the trauma bay of the ED during the shifts of the researchers was used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: In this study, all trauma scores performed similar in the ED for the prediction of ED mortality.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:RTS · EMTRAS · GAP

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the utility of Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure (GAP) scores, and Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS) in multiple trauma patients for the prediction of mortality in the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: In this observational diagnostic accuracy study, a consecutive convenience sample of all adult patients (older than 16 years) with multiple trauma (injuries confined to at least two body regions) admitted to the trauma bay of the ED during the shifts of the researchers was used. Presence of ED mortality was recorded, and RTS, EMTRAS, and GAP scores were calculated at the analysis stage of this study. Results: The study sample included 279 multiple trauma patients. Of the 279 patients, 13 (4.7%) died in the ED. Among the 266 patients who survived to hospital admission, 3 were lost to-follow-up (foreigner patients). In the following 30 days, 28 more patients were lost, 23 in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (23/62, 37.1%), 4 in the wards (4/131, 3.1%), and 1 after discharge (1/73, 0.1%). The prognostic accuracies (AUC) of RTS, EMTRAS, and GAP were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.93, respectively, for ED mortality. Conclusion: In this study, all trauma scores performed similar in the ED for the prediction of ED mortality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sacak, M. E., Akoglu, H., Onur, O., Denızbası, A. (2020). Comparison of the predictive utility of Revised Trauma Score, Emergency Trauma Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale-Age-Pressure scores for emergency department mortality in multiple trauma patients. Marmara Medical Journal, Volume: 33 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.815526

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AJ, Copes W, Fouty WJ. Trauma score. Crit Care Med 1981;9:672-6. doi: 10.1097/00003.246.198109000-00015
  2. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA, Flanagan ME. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma [Internet] 1989;29:623-9. doi: 10.1097/00005.373.198905000- 00017 Accessed on 23.02.2016
  3. Kondo Y, Abe T, Kohshi K, Tokuda Y, Cook EF, Kukita I. Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score. Crit Care BioMed Central 2011;15:R191. doi: 10.1186/cc10348
  4. Raum MR, Nijsten MWN, Vogelzang M, et al. Emergency trauma score: an instrument for early estimation of trauma severity. Crit Care Med 2009;37:1972-7. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0b013e31819fe96a
  5. Wutzler S, Maegele M, Wafaisade A, et al. Risk stratification in trauma and haemorrhagic shock: scoring systems derived from the TraumaRegister DGU(®). Injury 2014;45 Suppl 3:S29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.014
  6. Kim YH, Seo KS, Lee MJ, et al. Application of new trauma scoring systems for mortality prediction in patients with adult major trauma. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2014;25:447-55.
  7. Joosse P, de Jong W-JJ, Reitsma JB, Wendt KW, Schep NW, Goslings JC. External validation of the emergency trauma score for early prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med 2014;42:83-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829e53f5
  8. Peris A, Mangini M, Spina R, Franci A, Ognibene A, Zagli G. Application of emergency trauma score in a hub-and-spoke regional system. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:507-8. doi: 10.1093/ bja/aet268
  9. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h5527 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527
  10. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support. 10 ed. American College of Surgeons; 2018. ISBN 78-0-9968262-3-5. Available at: https:// viaaerearcp.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/atls-2018.pdf Accessed on 11.03.2016
  11. Ahun E, Koksal O, Sığırlı D, Torun G, Donmez SS, Armagan E. Value of the Glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial blood pressure score for predicting the mortality of major trauma patients presenting to the emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2014;20:241-7. doi: 10.5505/ tjtes.2014.76399
  12. Tan JH, Tan HCL, Noh NAM, Mohamad Y, Alwi RI. Validation of the trauma mortality prediction scores from a Malaysian population. Burns Trauma. BioMed Central 2017;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s41038.017.0102-z
  13. Nakhjavan-Shahraki B, Yousefifard M, Hajighanbari M, et al. Worthing Physiological Score vs Revised Trauma Score in outcome prediction of trauma patients; a Comparative study. Emerg (Tehran) 2017;5:e31.
  14. Kim SC, Kim DH, Kim TY, et al. The Revised Trauma Score plus serum albumin level improves the prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:1882-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.027
  15. Mangini M, Di Valvasone S, Greco C, et al. Validation of the new proposed Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS). Critical Care BioMed Central 2010;14(S1):P252. doi: 10.1186/cc8484
  16. Park HO, Kim JW, Kim SH, et al. Usability verification of the Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS) and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in patients with trauma: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8449. doi: 10.1097/MD.000.000.0000008449
  17. Hamed R, Maaref A, Amira F, Aouni H, Mekki I, Jebali A. Prognostic value of scoring tools in severe trauma patients admitted ot the emergency department. Tunis Med 2018;96:203-8.
  18. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support. 10 ed. American College of Surgeons; 2018. ISBN 78-0-9968262-3-5. Available at: https:// viaaerearcp.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/atls-2018.pdf Accessed on 11.03.2016
  19. Kim SC, Kim DH, Kim TY, et al. The Revised Trauma Score plus serum albumin level improves the prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:1882-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.027
  20. Hamed R, Maaref A, Amira F, Aouni H, Mekki I, Jebali A. Prognostic value of scoring tools in severe trauma patients admitted ot the emergency department. Tunis Med 2018;96:203-8.