KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2019 / Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Pre-service Science Teachers’ Professional Learning Through Content Representations (CoRes) Construction

Chokchai Yuenyong0000-0002-8606-5969
Warangkana Thongnoppakun0000-0002-0908-6694
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The resultant CoRes design and discussions indicate that the process of CoRes construction does have potentials for preservice science teachers ’ PCK development .

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to develop preservice science teachers ’ PCK for teaching science throughout Content representations ( CoRes ) construction activity of teacher professional development program .
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Research participants are three 5th year preservice science teachers from department of General Science, faculty of Education, Phuket Rajabhat University .
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The resultant CoRes design and discussions indicate that the process of CoRes construction does have potentials for preservice science teachers ’ PCK development .
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Pedagogical content knowledge · preservice science teacher

Abstract

This study aims to develop preservice science teachers ’ PCK for teaching science throughout Content representations ( CoRes ) construction activity of teacher professional development program . Research participants are three 5th year preservice science teachers from department of General Science, faculty of Education, Phuket Rajabhat University . Park and Oliver ( 2008 ) PCK conceptualization was used as a theoretical framework in this research . And, Content representations ( CoRes ) by Loughran et al . ( 2004 ) was employed as a research instrument in the lesson preparation process in order to elicit and portray teacher ’ s PCK for teaching science . Data are collected from the first preservice science teachers ’ CoRes design for teaching a given topic and student grade . Science student teachers are asked to create CoRes for teaching in topic ‘ Motion in one direction ’ for 7th grade students. The second CoRes designs are created for teaching their own lesson in school practicum . The development of preservice science teachers ’ PCK for teaching science represent from the analysis of CoRes design . The instances of preservice science teachers ’ PCK in aspects of science curriculum and student ’ s understanding of science is articulated and portrayed during lesson preparation using CoRes design . The resultant CoRes design and discussions indicate that the process of CoRes construction does have potentials for preservice science teachers ’ PCK development .

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yuenyong, C., Thongnoppakun, W. (2019). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Professional Learning Through Content Representations (CoRes) Construction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Volume: 7 Issue: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1279882

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (23)

  1. Adadan, E. & Oner, D. (2014). Exploring the Progression in Preservice Chemistry Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Representations: The Case of “Behavior of Gases”. Research in Science Education. 44, 829–85.
  2. Attakorn, K., Tayut, T., Pisitthawat, K., & Kanokorn, S. (2014). Soft skills of new teachers in the secondary schools of Khon Kaen Secondary Educational Service Area 25, Thailand. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1010-1013.
  3. Garritz, A., Labastida-Piña, DV., Espinosa-Bueno S., & Padilla, K., (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge of inquiry: an instrument to document it and its application to high school science teachers. Paper presented in National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, USA.
  4. Großschedl, J., Welter, V., & Harms, U. (2018). A new instrument for measuring preservice biologyteachers' pedagogical content knowledge: The PCK IBI. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 402-439.
  5. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes-a Strategy for Building PCK in Pre-service Science Teacher Education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355. Institute for Promotion of Teaching of Science and Technology (IPST). (2002). National Science Curriculum Standards. Bangkok: Kurusapa Ladproa.
  6. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.
  7. Knight, J. (2012). High-impact instruction: A framework for great teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  8. Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.
  9. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In Search of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science: Developing Ways of Articulating and Documenting Professional Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
  10. Loughran, J., Berry, A., Mulhall, P., & Woolnough, J. (2006). Understanding and valuing the development of pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. In Toward Research-Based Science Teacher Education (pp. 65–76). Aachan: Shaker.
  11. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., and Berry, A., (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1321.
  12. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. PCK and Science Education. Kluwer Press.
  13. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the Development of Pre-Service Science Elementary Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 23(7), 699–721.
  14. Nuangchalerm, P. (2016). Preferred and Actual Opinions about Inquiry-based Instruction and Understanding in Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Preservice Science Teachers. Journal Humanities and Social Science Mahasarakham University, 35(6), 127-134.
  15. Nuangchalerm, P., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2018). Comparative study between Indonesian and Thai Novice Science Teacher Students in Content of Science. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(2), 23-29.
  16. Office of the National Education Commission (ONEC). (2002). National Education Act B.E. 2002, Office of the National Education Commission, Bangkok.
  17. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008b). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.
  18. Prachagool, V., Nuangchalerm, P., Subramaniam, G., & Dostál, J. (2016). Pedagogical decision making through the lens of teacher preparation program. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 41-52.
  19. Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science Teacher Learning Progressions: A Review of Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.
  20. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  21. Wisetsat, C., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019) Enhancing Innovative Thinking of Thai Pre-service Teachers through Multi-educational Innovations. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 409-419.
  22. Wongsila, S. and Yuenyong, C. (2019). Enhancing Grade 12 Students’ Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Ability in Learning of the STS Genetics and DNA Technology Unit. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 215-235.
  23. Yuenyong, C. and Thathong, K. (2015). Physics teachers’ constructing knowledge base for physics teaching regarding constructivism in Thai contexts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 546-553.