KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Politik Ekonomik Kuram / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Uluslararası Ticaret Üzerinden Alınan Vergilerin ve Döviz Kurunun İthalat Üzerindeki Etkisi

The Impact of Taxation on International Commerce and Exchange Rate on Imports

Meltem Keskin(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ŞEREFLİKOÇHİSAR UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8536-4940
Semra Aydoğdu Bağcı(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ŞEREFLİKOÇHİSAR UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8078-5626
Sayfa
798–813
Yayın Tarihi
2024-09-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Analiz sonucunda hem uluslararası ticaretten alınan vergilerdeki artışın ve hem de döviz kurundaki artışın ithalat hacmini azalttığı tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sermaye piyasalarının küreselleşmesi, beraberinde sermaye hareketlerini de hızlandırarak dünyayı büyük bir pazara evirmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmanın amacı, ithalattan alınan vergiler ile nominal döviz kurundaki değişimin mal ve hizmet ithalat hacmine olan etkisini incelemektir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Analiz sonucunda hem uluslararası ticaretten alınan vergilerdeki artışın ve hem de döviz kurundaki artışın ithalat hacmini azalttığı tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Uluslararası Piyasalar · Uluslararası Ticaret Üzerinden Alınan Vergiler · Döviz Kuru

Özet

Sermaye piyasalarının küreselleşmesi, beraberinde sermaye hareketlerini de hızlandırarak dünyayı büyük bir pazara evirmiştir. Dış ticaret ise ülkelerin finansal yapısının oluşumunda önemli araç olmuştur. Bununla birlikte ülkeler arası ticarette gümrük vergisi ve ithalat kotaları gibi unsurlar dış ticarette belirleyici olmaktadır. Ülkelerin finansal politika aracı olan vergiler, dış ticaretin özellikle de ithalatın yönlendirilmesinde kullanılmaktadır. Dış ticaret faaliyetlerini belirleyici faktörlerinden biri ise döviz kurudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ithalattan alınan vergiler ile nominal döviz kurundaki değişimin mal ve hizmet ithalat hacmine olan etkisini incelemektir. Dünya Bankası resmi internet sayfasından alınan 1999–2021 dönemine ait veriler ile 20 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) ülkesinin incelendiği bu çalışmada AR (1) Kalıntılı Tesadüfi Etkiler Genelleştirilmiş En Küçük Kareler Regresyon Model Tahmincisi yardımıyla model analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda hem uluslararası ticaretten alınan vergilerdeki artışın ve hem de döviz kurundaki artışın ithalat hacmini azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç uluslararası ticaretten alınan vergiler ile döviz kurundaki azaltmanın ithalat hacmini artırdığı sonucunu ampirik olarak da desteklemektedir.

Abstract

The globalization of capital markets has accelerated capital movements, turning the world into one large marketplace. International trade has become an important tool in shaping the financial structure of countries. However, elements such as customs duties and import quotas play a decisive role in trade between countries. Taxes, which are a financial policy tool of countries, are used to influence foreign trade, particularly imports. One of the determining factors in foreign trade activities is the exchange rate. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of taxes on imports and the change in the nominal exchange rate on the import volume of goods and services. In this study, which examined 20 Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries with data for the period 1999-2021 taken from the World Bank official website, the model was analyzed with the help of AR (1) Residual Random Effects Generalized Least Squares Regression Model Estimator. The analysis revealed that increases in international trade taxes and exchange rate increases reduce the import volume. This result empirically supports the conclusion that taxes on international trade and reductions in exchange rates increase import volume.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Keskin, M., Bağcı, S. A. (2024). Uluslararası Ticaret Üzerinden Alınan Vergilerin ve Döviz Kurunun İthalat Üzerindeki Etkisi. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 798–813. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1504659

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (75)

  1. Abel, A. B., Bernanke, B. S. & Croushore, D. (2017). Macroeconomics. (9th Edition). Trans. Ö.F. Çolak. Elif Publishing House.
  2. Agbeyegbe, T. D., Stotsky, J. & WoldeMariam, A. (2006). Trade liberalization, exchange rate changes, and tax revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2), 261-284. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049-0078(06)00015-7
  3. Agbeyegbe, T. Stotsky, J. G. & WoldeMariam, A. (2004). Trade liberalization, exchange rate changes, and tax revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/178. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp04178.pdf
  4. Akthar, M., & Hilton, R. S. (1984). Effects of exchange rate uncertainty on German and US trade. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, 9(1), 7-16. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/quarterly_review/1984v9/v9n1article2.pdf
  5. Anastassiou, T. & Dritsaki, C. (2005). Tax revenues and economic growth: An empirical investigation for Greece using causality analysis. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfe-2-6-3
  6. Aristovnik, A., & Čeč, T. (2009). Compositional analysis of foreign currency reserves in the 1999-2007 period: The euro vs. the dollar as leading reserve currency. MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 1-21. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14350/1/Article_Aristovnik_Cec.pdf
  7. Arslanalp, S. & Simpson-Bell, C. (2021). US dollar share of global foreign exchange reserves drops to 25-year low. IMF, 5. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/05/05/blog-us-dollar-share-of-global-foreign-exchange-reserves-drops-to-25-year-low
  8. Atkin, D. & Donaldson, D. (2021). The Role of Trade in Economic Development, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Papers, 29314, 1-115.
  9. Bahmani- Oskooee, M. & Usman, A. & Ullah, S. (2023). Asymmetric Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Commodity Trade Between Pakistan and China. Global Business Review, 24(2) 510 –534, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/ 10.1177/0972150920916287?casa_token=nkAAcDeLMpgAAAAA:tYu8Bdx0sW49Sc5UXLLLrwatXk3Jy8rjShsg_rePtypWrob8ZRT31uVHKNIVxO29pHnZCvABv2v8Gg
  10. Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1178. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5fdc1c793ef7d0ff017bb5d5399eb582c4251605
  11. Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2010). Instrumental variable estimation in a data rich environment. Econometric Theory, 26(6), 1577–606. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40930668.
  12. Baltagi, B. H. & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814 – 823. https://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~fdominic/teaching/bio655/extras/Baltagi_Wu.pdf
  13. Barkat, K., Jarallah, S. & Alsamara, M. (2024). o Exchange Rate Changes Improve the Trade Balance inGCC Countries: Evidence from Nonlinear Panel Cointegration. The International Trade Journal, 38 (2), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2022.2121341
  14. Bawa Yussif, A-R., Onifade, S. T., Ay, A., Canitez, M. & Bekun, F. V. (2024). Modeling the volatility of exchange rate and international trade in Ghana: empirical evidence from GARCH and EGARCH. Journal of Economic and Administrative Science, 40(2), 308-324. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-11-2020-0187
  15. Bhargava, A., Franzini, L. & Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297285
  16. Beck, S. & Chaves, A. (2011). The impact of taxes on trade competitiveness. Working Papers 11-09, Department of Economics, University of Delaware, Newark.
  17. Bond, E. W., Duan, Y., Ji, T. & Yi Lu. (2023). Trade and welfare effects of export tax: Theory and evidence from China's incomplete export VAT rebate. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 214, 542-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4325960
  18. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Baltagi, B.H. (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (pp. 161-177). Vol. 15, JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
  19. Breuer, J. B., McNown, R. & Wallace, M. (2002). Series-Specific unit root tests with panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(5), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00276.
  20. Brown, M. B. & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(346), 364-367. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2285659
  21. Bussy, A. (2023). Corporate tax evasion: Evidence from international trade. European Economic Review, 159, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104571
  22. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
  23. Choi, I. (2002) Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels, Mimeo. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
  24. Convey. L. (2024). What is a reserve currency? Retrieved from https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/what-is-a-reserve-currency
  25. Cooper, R. N. (1971). An Assessment of Currency Devaluation in Developing Countries, Yale University Press.
  26. Çetin, F. & Keskin, M. (2024). Implications of international double taxation prevention agreements Turkey is party to on our foreign trade. Vergi Raporu, 296, 18-38. https://vergiraporu.com.tr/ReadArticle.aspx?Id=c506c80e-68a3-4268-8d1a-f11c8a266e98
  27. Erceg, C., Prestipino, A. & Raffo, A. (2023). Trade policies and fiscal devaluations. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(4), 104-140. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/pdf/doi/10.1257/mac.20210163
  28. Feldstein, M. S. & Krugman, P. R. (1990). International trade effects of value-added taxation. A. Razin and J. Slemrod (Eds.), Taxation in the global economy (pp. 263-282). University of Chicago Press.
  29. Fisher, R.A. (1932). Inverse probability and the use of likelihood. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 28, 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100010094
  30. Fisman, R. & Wei, S. J. (2004). Tax rates and tax evasion: Evidence from “Missing Imports” in China. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 471-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/381476
  31. Gotur, P. (1985). Effects of exchange rate volatility on trade. IMF Staff Papers, 32, 475 – 512. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866807
  32. Gujarati, D. N. & Porter, D. C. (2012). Basic Econometrics. (Ü. Şenesen and G. Gündem Şenesen, Trans.). İstanbul: Ezgi Printing.
  33. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panels. Econometrics Journal, 3, 148-161.
  34. Hadri, K. & Kurozumi, E. (2012). A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor. Economic Letters, 115(1), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.036
  35. Harris, R. & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00076-1
  36. Hatipler, M. (2011). Türkiye-AB gümrük birliği antlaşması ve antlaşmanın türkiye ekonomisine etkileri. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 14-32. https://unis.trakya.edu.tr/yayin-detay/2_CpGqCJa_1/turkiye-ab-gumruk-birligi-antlasmasi-ve-antlasmanin-turkiye-ekonomisine-etkileri
  37. Hausman, J. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271. http://www.econ.uiuc.edu/~econ536/ Papers/hausman78.pdf
  38. Holzner, M., Jovanović, B. & Vukšić, G. (2021). How do corporate taxes affect international trade? (No. 212). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw, 1-46. https://wiiw.ac.at/how-do-corporate-taxes-affect-international-trade-p-5990.html
  39. Hook, L.S. & Boon, T. H. (2000). Exchange rate volatility and Malaysian export to its major trading partners. Working Paper, 6. Universiti Putra Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2009.00220.x
  40. Hoyos, R. D. & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata Journal, 6(4), 482-496. https://doi/pdf/10.1177/1536867X0600600403
  41. Hwang, H. D. & Lee, J. W. (2005). Exchange rate volatility and trade flows of the UK in 1990s. International Area Review, 8(1), 173-182. https://doi/10.1177/223386590500800109
  42. Im, K., Pesaran, H. & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  43. Kaya, M. & Doğan, A. (2020). The role, declaration and control of customs value in taxation of goods subject to foreign trade. Gümrük Ticaret Dergisi, 7(19), 10-24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1054870
  44. Kayani, U. N., Aysan, A. F., Gul, A, Haider, S. A. & Ahmad, S. (2023). Unpacking the asymmetric impact of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: A study of selected developed and developing Asian economies. PLoS ONE, 18(10): e0291261, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291261
  45. Kolçak, M. (2013). The effects of foreign trade taxes on Turkish economy. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(4), 188-209. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/30528
  46. Kreuter, H. & Riccaboni, M. (2023). The impact of import tariffs on GDP and consumer welfare: A production network approach. Economic Modelling, Volume 126, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106374
  47. Lerner, A. P. (1936). The symmetry between import and export taxes. Economica, 3(11), 306-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549223
  48. Levene, H. (1960). Robust Tests for Equality of Variances. I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 278-292). Stanford University Press.
  49. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
  50. Lindé, J. & Pescatori, A. (2019). The macroeconomic effects of trade tariffs: Revisiting the Lerner symmetry result. Journal of International Money and Finance, 95, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.01.019
  51. Nicholson, M. W. (2013). The impact of tax regimes on international trade patterns. Contemporary Economic Policy, 31(4), 746-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2012.00321.x
  52. Maddala, G.S. & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-652. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
  53. Madzivanyika, E. (2016). Customs duty incentives and their effects on customs revenue mobilization: The case of Zimbabwe (2009-2014). Public and Municipal Finance, 5(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.05(1).2016.01
  54. McKenzie, M. D. (1998). The impact of exchange rate volatility on Australian trade flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 8(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-4431(98)00022-5
  55. Moon, H. R. & Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 1, 81-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.020
  56. Nishimura, Y. & Hirayama, K. (2013). Does exchange rate volatility deter Japan-China trade? Evidence from pre- and post-exchange rate reform in China. Japan and the World Economy, vol. 25, 90-101. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0922142513000108
  57. Oral Erbaş, S. (2008). Olasılık ve İstatistik. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  58. Pehlivan, O. &Öz, E. (2022). Uluslararası maliye ve vergilendirme. Ekin Yayınevi.
  59. Pesaran, M. H. (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Cambridge Working Papers in Econometrics, 435, 1-39. https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research-files/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0435.pdf
  60. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  61. Pesaran M. H., Ullah, A. & Yamagata, T. (2008), A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11, 105-127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23116064
  62. Pesaran M. H, Vanessa Smith L. & Yamagata T (2013). Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure. Journal of Econometrics, 175(2), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.02.001
  63. Petrović, P. & Gligorić, M. (2010). Exchange rate and trade balance: J-Curve effect, Panoeconomicus, 57(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1001023P
  64. Reese, S. & Westerlund, J. (2016). Panicca: Panic on cross‐section averages, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(6), 961-981. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26609658
  65. Rosenow, S. & O’shea, B. J. (2010). A handbook on the WTO customs valuation agreement. Cambridge University Press.
  66. Shoven, J. B. & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22(3), 1007-1051. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/mdg_ workshops/eclac_training_mdgs/shoven_whalley_jstor2725306.pdf
  67. Siripurapu, A. & Berman, N. (2023). The Dollar: The World’s Reserve Currency. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ dollar-worlds-reserve-currency
  68. Spiegel, M. R. & Stephens, L. J. (2011). Statistics (S. Çelebioğlu, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
  69. Taylor, M.P. & Sarno, L. (1998). The behavior of real exchanges during the post-Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics, 46(2), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00054-8
  70. Ünlü, F. (2024). Trade Balance, Real Exchange Rate and Trade Policy Uncertainty in Türkiye: Evidence from the SVAR Approach. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 40, 63–75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3384091
  71. Wilson, P. &Tat, K. C. (2001). Exchange rates and the trade balance: The case of Singapore 1970 to 1996. Journal of Asian Economics, 12(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(01)00072-0
  72. Yavuz, H. & Beşel, F. (2015). Relationship Between Taxes on International Trade and Transactions Income and Economic Growth in Türkiye: Frequency Domain Causality Analysis. Journal of Politics, Economics and Management Research, 3(1), 45-55. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1024814
  73. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2020). Panel zaman serileri analizi Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  74. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2018). Panel veri ekonometrisi Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  75. Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2013). İleri panel veri analizi Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.