KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Politik Ekonomik Kuram / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

Siyasal Sessizlik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Psikometrik Doğrulaması

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Political Silence Scale

Mehmet Kapusızoğlu(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1496-1286
Ahmet Karadağ(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4031-0295
Sayfa
1055–1082
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen sonuçlar, geliştirilen siyasal sessizlik ölçeğinin protesto temelli, algılanan risk temelli, uyum temelli ve değer temelli olmak üzere dört alt boyutlu geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Siyasal sessizlik, bireyin sahip olduğu siyasal düşüncenin kamuoyu önünde ifade edilmemesidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği için ilk aşamada 640 akademisyenden elde edilen verilerle Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi, ikinci aşamada ise 643 akademisyenden elde edilen verilerle Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen sonuçlar, geliştirilen siyasal sessizlik ölçeğinin protesto temelli, algılanan risk temelli, uyum temelli ve değer temelli olmak üzere dört alt boyutlu geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sessizlik · Siyasal Sessizlik · Suskunluk Sarmalı

Özet

Siyasal sessizlik, bireyin sahip olduğu siyasal düşüncenin kamuoyu önünde ifade edilmemesidir. Bireyin siyasal düşüncesini ifade edememesi menfaat elde etmek ya da korku gibi çeşitli sebeplere bağlı olarak ortaya çıkabilir. Bu çalışma, akademisyenlerin siyasal sessizlik nedenlerini çok boyutlu bir biçimde ele almayı ve siyasal sessizliği ölçmeye yarayacak bir ölçek geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma nicel araştırma desenine dayalı olarak ölçek geliştirme ve psikometrik doğrulama sürecini içermektedir. Ölçek geliştirme sürecinde literatürde yer alan bilgilerden yola çıkılarak madde havuzu oluşturulmuş ve oluşturulan madde havuzunun kapsam geçerliliği uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda elde edilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği için ilk aşamada 640 akademisyenden elde edilen verilerle Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi, ikinci aşamada ise 643 akademisyenden elde edilen verilerle Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenirliği Cronbach alfa katsayısı ile hesaplanmış, yakınsak ve ayrışma geçerliği ise bileşik güvenirlik (CR), ortalama açıklanan varyans (AVE) ve Fornell–Larcker kriterleri temelinde incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, geliştirilen siyasal sessizlik ölçeğinin protesto temelli, algılanan risk temelli, uyum temelli ve değer temelli olmak üzere dört alt boyutlu geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Abstract

Political silence refers to the failure of political thought to translate into political action for various reasons. Individuals may remain silent out of fear that future interests will be harmed or to secure specific benefits. This study aims to conceptualize political silence among individuals as a multidimensional construct by focusing on academics in Türkiye and to develop a valid and reliable measurement scale. The research, based on a quantitative design, includes scale development and psychometric validation. During the scale development process, an item pool was generated from the relevant literature, and content validity was established through expert evaluation. To examine the construct validity of the scale, an Exploratory Factor Analysis was performed on data from 640 academics in the first stage, and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted on data from 643 academics in the second stage. The scale’s reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed using composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and the Fornell–Larcker criterion. The findings demonstrate that the political silence scale developed in this study is a valid and reliable measurement instrument comprising four subdimensions: protest-based, perceived risk-based, conformity-based, and value-based political silence.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kapusızoğlu, M., Karadağ, A. (2026). Siyasal Sessizlik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Psikometrik Doğrulaması. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1955620

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (99)

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P. & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
  2. Alpar, R. (2013). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Detay Yayıncılık.
  3. Amah, O. E., & Okafor, C. A. (2008). Relationships among silence climate, employee silence behaviour and work attitudes: The role of self-esteem and locus of control. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2008.1.11
  4. Aristotle. (2013). Politics, 2. edition.; Carnes Lord (Trans). The University of Chicago Press.
  5. Asch, S. E. (1958). Effects of group pressure upon modification and distortion of judgments. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 174-183). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  6. Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: a comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 468-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000200
  7. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
  8. Bayram, A., & Bayer, N. (2019). Turkish adaptation of spiral of silence scale: The study of reliability and validity. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 3(6), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.610147
  9. Bernardi, L., Mattila, M., Papageorgiou, A., & Rapeli, L. (2023). Down but not yet out: Depression, political efficacy, and voting. Political Psychology, 44(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12837
  10. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  11. Biçer, C. (2024). Örgütsel sessizlik olgusu ve örgütlere olan etkisi: kavramsal bir çerçeve. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 7(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1455461
  12. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health. Social and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149), 1–18. https://doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
  13. Bowen, F., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1393-1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00385
  14. Brinsfield, C. T., Edwards, M. S., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Voice and silence in organizations: historical review and current conceptualizations. In J. Greenberg & M. S. Edwards (Ed.) Voice and Silence in Organizations (pp. 3-37). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  15. Brito-Vieira, M. (2021). The great wall of silence: voice-silence dynamics in authoritarian regimes. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(3), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796333
  16. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, (2nd ed.); Guilford Press.
  17. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage Publications.
  18. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with amos: basic concepts, applications, and programming, (3rd ed.); Routledge.
  19. Castoriadis, C. (2001). Dünyaya insana ve topluma dair. H. Tufan (Çev.) İletişim Yayınları.
  20. Chan, M. (2018). Reluctance to talk about politics in face-to-face and facebook settings: examining the impact of fear of ısolation, willingness to self-censor, and peer network characteristics. Mass Communication and Society, 21(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1358819
  21. Chen, H. T. (2018). Spiral of silence on social media and the moderating role of disagreement and publicness in the network: Analyzing expressive and withdrawal behaviors. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3917-3936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818763384.
  22. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150876
  23. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
  24. Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–10. https://doi: 10.7275/jyj1-4868
  25. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  26. Çakıcı, A. (2007). Örgütlerde sessizlik: Sessizliğin teorik temelleri ve dinamikleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 145-162. https://izlik.org/JA68UC57BB
  27. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: theory and applications, 4. edition.; Sage Publications.
  28. Duhm, D. (1996). Kapitalizmde korku. S. Şölçün (Çev.). Ayraç Yayınevi.
  29. Dikili, E. (2023). The impact of workplace exclusion and time traps on organizational inertia. Journal of Theoretical and Empirical Research on Management, 3, 83–94.
  30. Donsbach, W., Tsfati, Y., & Salmon, C. T. (2014). The legacy of spiral of silence theory: An introduction. In Donsbach, W., Salmon, C. T., Tsfati, Y. (Ed.) Spiral of silence: New perspectives on communication and public opinion (pp. 1-18). Routledge.
  31. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: how americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Erkuş, A. (2014). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme. Pegem Akademi.
  33. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  34. Ferguson, K. (2003). Silence: A politics. Contemporary Political Theory, 2, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300054
  35. Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  36. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss. Sage Publications.
  37. Finch, W. H. (2023). A comparison of methods for determining the number of factors. Psych, 5(3), 1014–1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067
  38. Gibson, J. L., & Sutherland, J. L. (2023). Keeping your mouth shut: spiraling self-censorship in the united states. Political Science Quarterly, 138(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad037.
  39. Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452-463, https://doi.org/10.1086/297808
  40. Gorsuch, R. L. (2015). Factor analysis. Routledge.
  41. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001514
  42. Güriş, S., & Astar, M. (2015). Bilimsel araştırmalarda spss ile istatistik. Der Yayınları.
  43. Habermas, J. (1992). Legitimation crisis. Polity Press.
  44. Haidt, J. (2025). Doğru akıl: Neden iyi insanlar siyaset ve din yüzünden bölünür?. Ali Kürşat Çiftçi (Çev.). Feliks Kitap.
  45. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis, 8th edition.; Cengage Learning.
  46. Hayes, A. F., Glynn C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 298-323, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh073
  47. Henriksen, K., & Dayton, E. (2006). Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. Health Services Research, 41, 1539-1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00564.x
  48. Hirschman, O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
  49. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1) 53–60. available online at www.ejbrm.com
  50. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  51. İrvan, S. (2012). Suskunluk sarmalı kuramı ve elisabeth noelle-neumann’ın özgeçmişi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, 421-450. https://izlik.org/JA48GY58KE
  52. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi:10.1007/BF02291575
  53. Karagöz Y. (2016). Spss 23 ve amos 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  54. Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 311-334. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000161
  55. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edition.; Guilford Press.
  56. Kuran, T. (1997). Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press.
  57. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  58. Lee, H., Oshita, T., Oh, H.J. & Hove, T. (2014). When do people speak out? Integrating the spiral of silence and the situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.864243
  59. Matthes, J., Rios Morrison, K., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37(6), 774-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362685
  60. Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & Von Sikorski, C. (2018). The “spiral of silence” revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217745429
  61. McQuail, D. (2014). Paradigm shifts in the study of media effects. In Donsbach, W., Salmon, C. T., Tsfati, Y. (Ed.) Spiral of silence: New perspectives on communication and public opinion (pp. 35-43). Routledge.
  62. Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why?. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
  63. Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A. C. S., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2017). Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30(3), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
  64. Morrison, E. W., and Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), pp. 706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
  65. Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699001078001
  66. Nader, L. (2001). Breaking the silence-politics and professional autonomy. Anthropological Quarterly, 75(1), s.161-168.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318345
  67. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
  68. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1998). Kamuoyu, suskunluk sarmalının keşfi. Dost Kitabevi.
  69. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3rd edition.; McGraw-Hill.
  70. Ojeda, C. (2015). Depression and political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1226-1243, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12173
  71. Özcan, U. (2022). Sosyolojide toplumsal değer ve norm kavramlarına yeniden bir bakış. Sosyologca, 23(2), 19–31.
  72. Özdamar, K. (2017). Eğitim, sağlık ve davranış bilimlerinde ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Nisan Yayınları.
  73. Petric, G., & Pinter, A. (2002). From social perception to public expression of opinion: A structural equation modeling approach to the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(1), 37-53, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.1.37
  74. Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.) Research in Personel and Human Research Management, 20, (pp. 331-369). Elsevier Science/JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3
  75. Sarıbay, A. Y. (2026). Siyasal kültür. M. E. Y. Saraç (Ed.). Sosyal bilimler ansiklopedisi cilt 4 içinde (s.68-70). https://ansiklopedi.tubitak.gov.tr/ansiklopedi/siyasal_kultur
  76. Scheufle, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3-28, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3
  77. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
  78. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 4th edition.; Routledge.
  79. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
  80. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
  81. Seçer İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.
  82. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. W. H. Freeman and Company.
  83. Sezer Şanlı, A. (2022). Bir yurttaş protestosu olarak sürekli aydınlık için bir dakika karanlık eylemleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 48, 23-45. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.947847
  84. Silber, H., Moy, P., Johnson, P. T., Neumann, R., Stadmüller, S. & Repke, L. (2022). Survey participation as a function of democratic engagement, trust in institutions, and perceptions of surveys. Social Science Quarterly, 103, 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13218
  85. Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x
  86. Speier, H. (1995). The rise of public opinion. In R. Jackall (Ed.) Propaganda (pp. 26–46). New York University Press.
  87. Şehitoğlu, Y. (2010). Örgütsel sessizlik örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve algılanan çalışan performansı ilişkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gebze Üniversitesi Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü.
  88. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2015). Using multivariate statistics, 6th edition.; Pearson Longman.
  89. Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics, 4th edition.; Cambridge University Press.
  90. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  91. Taylor, D. G. (1982). Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: A formal analysis, Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(3), 311–335, https://doi.org/10.1086/268729
  92. Thompson, B. (2008). Foundations of behavioral statistics: an ınsight-based approach. Guilford Press.
  93. Tse, C. H., & Lee, F. L. F. (2025). Understanding avoidance of political discussions in an autocratizing society. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 37(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaf013
  94. Willnat, L., Lee, W., & Detenber, B. H. (2002). Individual‐level predictors of public outspokenness: A test of the spiral of silence theory in singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 391-412, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.4.391
  95. Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for lawshe’s content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286.
  96. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  97. Viera, B. M., Jung, T., Gray, S. W. D., & Rollo, T. (2019). The nature of silence and its democratic possibilities. Contemporary Political Theory, 18, 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2
  98. Yaylagül, L. (2008). Kitle iletişim kuramları. Dipnot Yayınları.
  99. Yılmaz, N. (2022). Siyasi etiğin önemi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz, 13(61), 13-29. https://izlik.org/JA27WZ63EB